Compare
Acacia Gardens vs Stanhope Gardens
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.4 km apart · Acacia Gardens profile · Stanhope Gardens profile
Acacia Gardens Stanhope Gardens
Stanhope Gardens and Acacia Gardens are neighbouring areas in Blacktown, but they offer very different experiences for pedestrians. Stanhope Gardens is much more walkable, with 96.5% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and 71.7% near health services, compared to 41.0% and 19.6% in Acacia Gardens. This is reflected in the street design, with Stanhope Gardens having far higher street connectivity. Acacia Gardens, however, is more focused on school access, with 99.5% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a school, far higher than the 44.7% in Stanhope Gardens.
Everyday life in both places is very similar, with nearly identical typical weekly household incomes and a shared high proportion of people who speak a language other than English at home. Both areas also have a high share of children under 15. While they share these traits, Stanhope Gardens has a slightly higher proportion of university-qualified adults and people earning $2,000 or more a week. Both areas see far more people working from home than the national figure.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,681
- First area, 2016: 3,798
- First area, 2021: 3,668
- Second area, 2011: 7,671
- Second area, 2016: 9,163
- Second area, 2021: 9,349
- First area, 2011: 32 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Acacia Gardens: 0.0% males, 0.6% females; 85+ in Stanhope Gardens: 0.3% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Acacia Gardens: 0.5% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in Stanhope Gardens: 0.6% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Acacia Gardens: 0.8% males, 0.6% females; 75–79 in Stanhope Gardens: 0.7% males, 0.8% females
- 70–74 in Acacia Gardens: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 70–74 in Stanhope Gardens: 1.4% males, 1.9% females
- 65–69 in Acacia Gardens: 1.3% males, 1.9% females; 65–69 in Stanhope Gardens: 1.8% males, 2.1% females
- 60–64 in Acacia Gardens: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Stanhope Gardens: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 55–59 in Acacia Gardens: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Stanhope Gardens: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 50–54 in Acacia Gardens: 3.0% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Stanhope Gardens: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 45–49 in Acacia Gardens: 3.8% males, 3.7% females; 45–49 in Stanhope Gardens: 4.5% males, 4.4% females
- 40–44 in Acacia Gardens: 4.2% males, 4.3% females; 40–44 in Stanhope Gardens: 4.7% males, 5.0% females
- 35–39 in Acacia Gardens: 4.1% males, 4.9% females; 35–39 in Stanhope Gardens: 4.3% males, 5.0% females
- 30–34 in Acacia Gardens: 3.7% males, 4.1% females; 30–34 in Stanhope Gardens: 2.5% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Acacia Gardens: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 25–29 in Stanhope Gardens: 2.2% males, 2.0% females
- 20–24 in Acacia Gardens: 3.3% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Stanhope Gardens: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Acacia Gardens: 3.4% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Stanhope Gardens: 4.0% males, 3.4% females
- 10–14 in Acacia Gardens: 4.1% males, 3.5% females; 10–14 in Stanhope Gardens: 4.5% males, 4.0% females
- 5–9 in Acacia Gardens: 4.4% males, 3.5% females; 5–9 in Stanhope Gardens: 4.0% males, 3.9% females
- 0–4 in Acacia Gardens: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 0–4 in Stanhope Gardens: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $837
- First area, 2016: $905
- First area, 2021: $1,055
- Second area, 2011: $859
- Second area, 2016: $882
- Second area, 2021: $1,050
- First area, 2011: $2,217
- First area, 2016: $2,378
- First area, 2021: $2,796
- Second area, 2011: $2,140
- Second area, 2016: $2,291
- Second area, 2021: $2,868
- First area, 2011: $2,204
- First area, 2016: $2,367
- First area, 2021: $2,800
- Second area, 2011: $2,279
- Second area, 2016: $2,405
- Second area, 2021: $3,068
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.4
- First area, 2016: 3.4
- First area, 2021: 3.2
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 3.2
- Second area, 2021: 3.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $450
- First area, 2016: $520
- First area, 2021: $540
- Second area, 2011: $500
- Second area, 2016: $575
- Second area, 2021: $580
- First area, 2011: $2,500
- First area, 2016: $2,383
- First area, 2021: $2,484
- Second area, 2011: $2,817
- Second area, 2016: $2,500
- Second area, 2021: $2,700
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Acacia Gardens with nearby areas
Compare Stanhope Gardens with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Acacia Gardens vs Stanhope Gardens [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10014/acacia-gardens/vs/SAL13664/stanhope-gardens