Compare
Acacia Gardens vs Kings Langley
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.7 km apart · Acacia Gardens profile · Kings Langley profile
Acacia Gardens Kings Langley
Kings Langley and Acacia Gardens are neighbouring areas in Greater Sydney with very different profiles. Acacia Gardens is much more multicultural, with 45.1% of people born overseas and 47.2% using a language other than English at home, compared to 28.4% and 24.6% in Kings Langley. Acacia Gardens also has a more highly qualified workforce, with 36.9% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher, while Kings Langley has 29.1%. In contrast, Kings Langley is an older area where 18.8% of residents are aged 65 and over, far higher than the 8.7% in Acacia Gardens. Home ownership also differs, with 38.4% of homes in Kings Langley owned outright, compared to just 20.6% in Acacia Gardens.
These two areas are remarkably similar in their daily costs and family structures, with typical weekly family incomes of $2,694 in Kings Langley and $2,800 in Acacia Gardens. Both areas are almost equally likely to have one-parent families and share very similar commute times to the city. While they are alike in these respects, they differ in their local amenities; Kings Langley is much better for walking to groceries, but Acacia Gardens is far better for those walking to health services.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,681
- First area, 2016: 3,798
- First area, 2021: 3,668
- Second area, 2011: 9,267
- Second area, 2016: 9,353
- Second area, 2021: 9,354
- First area, 2011: 32 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Acacia Gardens: 0.0% males, 0.6% females; 85+ in Kings Langley: 0.7% males, 1.0% females
- 80–84 in Acacia Gardens: 0.5% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in Kings Langley: 1.0% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Acacia Gardens: 0.8% males, 0.6% females; 75–79 in Kings Langley: 1.7% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Acacia Gardens: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 70–74 in Kings Langley: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 65–69 in Acacia Gardens: 1.3% males, 1.9% females; 65–69 in Kings Langley: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
- 60–64 in Acacia Gardens: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Kings Langley: 2.5% males, 3.1% females
- 55–59 in Acacia Gardens: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Kings Langley: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 50–54 in Acacia Gardens: 3.0% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Kings Langley: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Acacia Gardens: 3.8% males, 3.7% females; 45–49 in Kings Langley: 3.6% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Acacia Gardens: 4.2% males, 4.3% females; 40–44 in Kings Langley: 3.8% males, 4.0% females
- 35–39 in Acacia Gardens: 4.1% males, 4.9% females; 35–39 in Kings Langley: 3.2% males, 4.1% females
- 30–34 in Acacia Gardens: 3.7% males, 4.1% females; 30–34 in Kings Langley: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 25–29 in Acacia Gardens: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 25–29 in Kings Langley: 2.0% males, 1.6% females
- 20–24 in Acacia Gardens: 3.3% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Kings Langley: 3.0% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Acacia Gardens: 3.4% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Kings Langley: 3.5% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Acacia Gardens: 4.1% males, 3.5% females; 10–14 in Kings Langley: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Acacia Gardens: 4.4% males, 3.5% females; 5–9 in Kings Langley: 3.5% males, 3.8% females
- 0–4 in Acacia Gardens: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 0–4 in Kings Langley: 3.2% males, 2.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $837
- First area, 2016: $905
- First area, 2021: $1,055
- Second area, 2011: $733
- Second area, 2016: $825
- Second area, 2021: $955
- First area, 2011: $2,217
- First area, 2016: $2,378
- First area, 2021: $2,796
- Second area, 2011: $1,940
- Second area, 2016: $2,114
- Second area, 2021: $2,457
- First area, 2011: $2,204
- First area, 2016: $2,367
- First area, 2021: $2,800
- Second area, 2011: $2,049
- Second area, 2016: $2,258
- Second area, 2021: $2,694
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.4
- First area, 2016: 3.4
- First area, 2021: 3.2
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $450
- First area, 2016: $520
- First area, 2021: $540
- Second area, 2011: $400
- Second area, 2016: $480
- Second area, 2021: $500
- First area, 2011: $2,500
- First area, 2016: $2,383
- First area, 2021: $2,484
- Second area, 2011: $2,200
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,579
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Acacia Gardens with nearby areas
Compare Kings Langley with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Acacia Gardens vs Kings Langley [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10014/acacia-gardens/vs/SAL12157/kings-langley