Compare
Biloela vs Bundaberg
Sub-region (SA3) comparison ≈ 227 km apart · Biloela profile · Bundaberg profile
Biloela Bundaberg
Bundaberg and Biloela are two distinct Queensland areas with very different profiles. Bundaberg is much older, with a typical resident aged 47 compared to 38 in Biloela. This older population is reflected in health data, where 37.2% of Bundaberg residents have a long-term health condition, 12 percentage points higher than Biloela. Biloela is more prosperous, with a typical weekly household income of $1,766, while Bundaberg is much lower at $1,170. Bundaberg also has far more public transport options and better walkability, with 59% of homes within a 10-minute walk of a stop compared to none in Biloela.
The age gap between the two areas has widened since 2016, growing from eight to nine years. Despite this, they share some similarities, such as having almost identical shares of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (around 5%) and the same typical monthly home-loan payment of $1,300. Both areas also see a very small share of people commuting by public transport, at 0.7%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 14,319
- First area, 2021: 14,513
- Second area, 2011: 84,739
- Second area, 2016: 87,765
- Second area, 2021: 93,797
- First area, 2016: 37 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 47 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Biloela: 0.5% males, 1.2% females; 85+ in Bundaberg: 1.2% males, 1.6% females
- 80–84 in Biloela: 1.2% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Bundaberg: 1.6% males, 1.8% females
- 75–79 in Biloela: 1.5% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in Bundaberg: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 70–74 in Biloela: 2.1% males, 1.8% females; 70–74 in Bundaberg: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 65–69 in Biloela: 2.8% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Bundaberg: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 60–64 in Biloela: 3.4% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Bundaberg: 3.5% males, 3.8% females
- 55–59 in Biloela: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Bundaberg: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 50–54 in Biloela: 3.3% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Bundaberg: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Biloela: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Biloela: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Bundaberg: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Biloela: 3.7% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Bundaberg: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Biloela: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 30–34 in Bundaberg: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 25–29 in Biloela: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Bundaberg: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 20–24 in Biloela: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 20–24 in Bundaberg: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
- 15–19 in Biloela: 3.0% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Biloela: 3.7% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Bundaberg: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Biloela: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 5–9 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Biloela: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 0–4 in Bundaberg: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $714
- First area, 2021: $856
- Second area, 2011: $430
- Second area, 2016: $495
- Second area, 2021: $603
- First area, 2016: $1,575
- First area, 2021: $1,766
- Second area, 2011: $844
- Second area, 2016: $987
- Second area, 2021: $1,170
- First area, 2016: $1,895
- First area, 2021: $2,138
- Second area, 2011: $991
- Second area, 2016: $1,201
- Second area, 2021: $1,441
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $190
- First area, 2021: $240
- Second area, 2011: $230
- Second area, 2016: $260
- Second area, 2021: $285
- First area, 2016: $1,517
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,387
- Second area, 2016: $1,365
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Biloela with nearby areas
Compare Bundaberg with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Biloela vs Bundaberg [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa3/30804/biloela/vs/31901/bundaberg