Compare
Rocklea - Acacia Ridge vs Springfield - Redbank
Sub-region (SA3) comparison ≈ 14 km apart · Rocklea - Acacia Ridge profile · Springfield - Redbank profile
Rocklea - Acacia Ridge Springfield - Redbank
Springfield - Redbank and Rocklea - Acacia Ridge are nearby areas with different social profiles. Rocklea - Acacia Ridge is far more diverse, with 47.6% of people born overseas and 47.8% using a language other than English at home. It also has a more highly qualified workforce, with 31.6% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher. In contrast, Springfield - Redbank has a much younger population, with a typical age of 31, and a far higher share of households renting at 43.0%.
The gap in cultural diversity has widened since 2011, with the difference in overseas births growing from 11.6% to 15.7%. Despite this, the two areas are very similar in other ways, such as typical weekly household incomes, which sit at $1,854 in Springfield - Redbank and $1,941 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge. Both areas also feature a high proportion of large homes, with over 90% having three or more bedrooms.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 53,641
- First area, 2016: 59,530
- First area, 2021: 67,890
- Second area, 2011: 66,360
- Second area, 2016: 83,910
- Second area, 2021: 105,202
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 33 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 29 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 31 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 0.4% males, 0.8% females; 85+ in Springfield - Redbank: 0.2% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 0.6% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Springfield - Redbank: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 75–79 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Springfield - Redbank: 0.6% males, 0.7% females
- 70–74 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 1.5% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Springfield - Redbank: 1.0% males, 1.1% females
- 65–69 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 1.9% males, 2.1% females; 65–69 in Springfield - Redbank: 1.4% males, 1.5% females
- 60–64 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 2.1% males, 2.5% females; 60–64 in Springfield - Redbank: 1.8% males, 1.9% females
- 55–59 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 55–59 in Springfield - Redbank: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 50–54 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Springfield - Redbank: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 45–49 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Springfield - Redbank: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 3.7% males, 3.9% females; 40–44 in Springfield - Redbank: 3.6% males, 3.6% females
- 35–39 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 4.6% males, 4.9% females; 35–39 in Springfield - Redbank: 4.2% males, 4.6% females
- 30–34 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 4.1% males, 4.5% females; 30–34 in Springfield - Redbank: 4.1% males, 4.7% females
- 25–29 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 25–29 in Springfield - Redbank: 3.6% males, 4.0% females
- 20–24 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 20–24 in Springfield - Redbank: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 15–19 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in Springfield - Redbank: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 10–14 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 3.5% males, 3.5% females; 10–14 in Springfield - Redbank: 4.4% males, 4.1% females
- 5–9 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 4.2% males, 3.8% females; 5–9 in Springfield - Redbank: 4.8% males, 4.5% females
- 0–4 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 3.7% males, 3.6% females; 0–4 in Springfield - Redbank: 4.5% males, 4.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $629
- First area, 2016: $664
- First area, 2021: $797
- Second area, 2011: $650
- Second area, 2016: $715
- Second area, 2021: $840
- First area, 2011: $1,542
- First area, 2016: $1,648
- First area, 2021: $1,941
- Second area, 2011: $1,394
- Second area, 2016: $1,575
- Second area, 2021: $1,854
- First area, 2011: $1,642
- First area, 2016: $1,734
- First area, 2021: $2,048
- Second area, 2011: $1,490
- Second area, 2016: $1,669
- Second area, 2021: $2,025
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 3.0
- First area, 2021: 3.0
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 3.1
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $360
- First area, 2016: $390
- First area, 2021: $400
- Second area, 2011: $315
- Second area, 2016: $345
- Second area, 2021: $360
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $1,863
- First area, 2021: $1,872
- Second area, 2011: $1,920
- Second area, 2016: $1,733
- Second area, 2021: $1,710
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Rocklea - Acacia Ridge with nearby areas
Compare Springfield - Redbank with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Rocklea - Acacia Ridge vs Springfield - Redbank [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa3/30305/rocklea-acacia-ridge/vs/31004/springfield-redbank