Compare
Nathan vs Rocklea - Acacia Ridge
Sub-region (SA3) comparison ≈ 9.0 km apart · Nathan profile · Rocklea - Acacia Ridge profile
Nathan Rocklea - Acacia Ridge
Rocklea - Acacia Ridge and Nathan are neighbouring areas in Queensland with very different characters. Rocklea - Acacia Ridge is far more culturally diverse, with 47.6% of people born overseas and 47.8% using a language other than English at home. It also has more family-sized homes, as 93.8% have three or more bedrooms. In contrast, Nathan is very walkable and has much better access to amenities, with a walkability score of 7.4 (very walkable) compared to 5.3 (somewhat walkable) in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge.
Since 2011, several gaps between these neighbours have widened. Rocklea - Acacia Ridge has become increasingly diverse relative to Nathan, and more people in Nathan now hold a bachelor degree or higher. Despite these trends, the two areas remain similar in some ways, such as their typical weekly rent and the proportion of people needing help with daily activities. Both areas also sit above the national figure for the share of adults with a bachelor degree or higher.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 36,517
- First area, 2016: 38,872
- First area, 2021: 39,907
- Second area, 2011: 53,641
- Second area, 2016: 59,530
- Second area, 2021: 67,890
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 35 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Nathan: 0.7% males, 1.3% females; 85+ in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 0.4% males, 0.8% females
- 80–84 in Nathan: 0.8% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 0.6% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Nathan: 1.1% males, 1.3% females; 75–79 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 0.9% males, 1.0% females
- 70–74 in Nathan: 1.5% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 1.5% males, 1.6% females
- 65–69 in Nathan: 1.7% males, 1.8% females; 65–69 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 1.9% males, 2.1% females
- 60–64 in Nathan: 2.2% males, 2.3% females; 60–64 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 2.1% males, 2.5% females
- 55–59 in Nathan: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 55–59 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 2.5% males, 2.6% females
- 50–54 in Nathan: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 45–49 in Nathan: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Nathan: 3.8% males, 3.7% females; 40–44 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 3.7% males, 3.9% females
- 35–39 in Nathan: 4.0% males, 4.3% females; 35–39 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 4.6% males, 4.9% females
- 30–34 in Nathan: 4.4% males, 4.2% females; 30–34 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 4.1% males, 4.5% females
- 25–29 in Nathan: 4.4% males, 3.9% females; 25–29 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 20–24 in Nathan: 4.0% males, 3.6% females; 20–24 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 15–19 in Nathan: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Nathan: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 3.5% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Nathan: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 4.2% males, 3.8% females
- 0–4 in Nathan: 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 0–4 in Rocklea - Acacia Ridge: 3.7% males, 3.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $600
- First area, 2016: $689
- First area, 2021: $904
- Second area, 2011: $629
- Second area, 2016: $664
- Second area, 2021: $797
- First area, 2011: $1,365
- First area, 2016: $1,653
- First area, 2021: $2,062
- Second area, 2011: $1,542
- Second area, 2016: $1,648
- Second area, 2021: $1,941
- First area, 2011: $1,677
- First area, 2016: $1,986
- First area, 2021: $2,477
- Second area, 2011: $1,642
- Second area, 2016: $1,734
- Second area, 2021: $2,048
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $325
- First area, 2016: $375
- First area, 2021: $388
- Second area, 2011: $360
- Second area, 2016: $390
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,100
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $1,863
- Second area, 2021: $1,872
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Nathan with nearby areas
Compare Rocklea - Acacia Ridge with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Nathan vs Rocklea - Acacia Ridge [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa3/30304/nathan/vs/30305/rocklea-acacia-ridge