Compare
Upper Goulburn Valley vs Macedon Ranges
Sub-region (SA3) comparison ≈ 78 km apart · Upper Goulburn Valley profile · Macedon Ranges profile
Upper Goulburn Valley Macedon Ranges
Upper Goulburn Valley and Macedon Ranges are two Victorian regions with very different economic profiles. The typical weekly household income in Macedon Ranges is $2,183, which is far higher than the $1,328 seen in Upper Goulburn Valley. This wealth gap is mirrored in education and home size, with Macedon Ranges having a far higher share of residents who finished Year 12 (58.9% compared to 43.2%) and a higher proportion of homes with three or more bedrooms. Upper Goulburn Valley is noticeably older, with a typical resident aged 47 and a much higher share of people aged 65 and over (24.9% versus 17.0%).
Everyday life in both areas shares several similarities, including almost identical rates of volunteering and very low numbers of people who speak a language other than English at home. While they share these commonalities, the financial gap between them has widened since 2011, particularly for those earning $3,000 or more a week. Other differences are stark; Upper Goulburn Valley is much more remote, with a drive time to the city of 126 minutes, whereas the trip from Macedon Ranges takes 48 minutes.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 49,912
- First area, 2016: 53,840
- First area, 2021: 60,002
- Second area, 2011: 26,638
- Second area, 2016: 29,574
- Second area, 2021: 32,969
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 46 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Upper Goulburn Valley: 1.1% males, 1.6% females; 85+ in Macedon Ranges: 0.5% males, 0.7% females
- 80–84 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 1.4% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Macedon Ranges: 0.9% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Macedon Ranges: 1.7% males, 1.6% females
- 70–74 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 70–74 in Macedon Ranges: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 65–69 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 3.9% males, 3.7% females; 65–69 in Macedon Ranges: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 60–64 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 4.0% males, 4.2% females; 60–64 in Macedon Ranges: 3.3% males, 3.2% females
- 55–59 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 3.6% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Macedon Ranges: 3.5% males, 3.5% females
- 50–54 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Macedon Ranges: 3.7% males, 3.9% females
- 45–49 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 2.8% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Macedon Ranges: 3.5% males, 3.9% females
- 40–44 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Macedon Ranges: 3.3% males, 3.6% females
- 35–39 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 35–39 in Macedon Ranges: 2.9% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Macedon Ranges: 2.4% males, 2.6% females
- 25–29 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Macedon Ranges: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 20–24 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 2.6% males, 2.1% females; 20–24 in Macedon Ranges: 2.4% males, 2.1% females
- 15–19 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Macedon Ranges: 3.6% males, 3.2% females
- 10–14 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Macedon Ranges: 3.8% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 5–9 in Macedon Ranges: 3.9% males, 3.6% females
- 0–4 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Macedon Ranges: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $484
- First area, 2016: $570
- First area, 2021: $697
- Second area, 2011: $629
- Second area, 2016: $728
- Second area, 2021: $901
- First area, 2011: $922
- First area, 2016: $1,095
- First area, 2021: $1,328
- Second area, 2011: $1,542
- Second area, 2016: $1,776
- Second area, 2021: $2,183
- First area, 2011: $1,157
- First area, 2016: $1,386
- First area, 2021: $1,737
- Second area, 2011: $1,757
- Second area, 2016: $2,029
- Second area, 2021: $2,468
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $180
- First area, 2016: $230
- First area, 2021: $280
- Second area, 2011: $258
- Second area, 2016: $321
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,500
- Second area, 2011: $1,733
- Second area, 2016: $1,842
- Second area, 2021: $2,014
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Upper Goulburn Valley with nearby areas
Compare Macedon Ranges with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Upper Goulburn Valley vs Macedon Ranges [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa3/20401/upper-goulburn-valley/vs/21002/macedon-ranges