Compare
Upper Goulburn Valley vs Nillumbik - Kinglake
Sub-region (SA3) comparison ≈ 70 km apart · Upper Goulburn Valley profile · Nillumbik - Kinglake profile
Upper Goulburn Valley Nillumbik - Kinglake
Upper Goulburn Valley and Nillumbik - Kinglake are two Victorian regions that differ sharply in wealth and education. Nillumbik - Kinglake has a far more qualified workforce, with 31.1% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 14.8% in Upper Goulburn Valley. This is mirrored in household earnings; the typical weekly income in Nillumbik - Kinglake is $2,427, which is far higher than the $1,328 seen in Upper Goulburn Valley. In contrast, Upper Goulburn Valley has a much higher proportion of people living alone at 30.1%, while only 15.0% do so in Nillumbik - Kinglake.
Since 2011, the gap in typical incomes and university qualifications between the two areas has widened. Despite these diverging trends, they share a similar housing landscape, with both having a very high proportion of separate houses. They also have nearly identical rates of full-time employment and unemployment. While Upper Goulburn Valley is generally older, with a typical resident aged 47, both areas remain well above the national figure for the typical age of residents.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 49,912
- First area, 2016: 53,840
- First area, 2021: 60,002
- Second area, 2011: 63,919
- Second area, 2016: 65,123
- Second area, 2021: 67,105
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 46 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Upper Goulburn Valley: 1.1% males, 1.6% females; 85+ in Nillumbik - Kinglake: 0.5% males, 0.8% females
- 80–84 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 1.4% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Nillumbik - Kinglake: 0.8% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Nillumbik - Kinglake: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 70–74 in Nillumbik - Kinglake: 2.3% males, 2.3% females
- 65–69 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 3.9% males, 3.7% females; 65–69 in Nillumbik - Kinglake: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 60–64 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 4.0% males, 4.2% females; 60–64 in Nillumbik - Kinglake: 3.6% males, 3.7% females
- 55–59 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 3.6% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Nillumbik - Kinglake: 3.7% males, 3.9% females
- 50–54 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Nillumbik - Kinglake: 3.9% males, 4.1% females
- 45–49 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 2.8% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Nillumbik - Kinglake: 3.7% males, 4.1% females
- 40–44 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Nillumbik - Kinglake: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 35–39 in Nillumbik - Kinglake: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 30–34 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Nillumbik - Kinglake: 2.3% males, 2.4% females
- 25–29 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Nillumbik - Kinglake: 2.1% males, 2.0% females
- 20–24 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 2.6% males, 2.1% females; 20–24 in Nillumbik - Kinglake: 3.2% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Nillumbik - Kinglake: 3.8% males, 3.5% females
- 10–14 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Nillumbik - Kinglake: 3.7% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 5–9 in Nillumbik - Kinglake: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Upper Goulburn Valley: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Nillumbik - Kinglake: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $484
- First area, 2016: $570
- First area, 2021: $697
- Second area, 2011: $689
- Second area, 2016: $776
- Second area, 2021: $950
- First area, 2011: $922
- First area, 2016: $1,095
- First area, 2021: $1,328
- Second area, 2011: $1,826
- Second area, 2016: $2,051
- Second area, 2021: $2,427
- First area, 2011: $1,157
- First area, 2016: $1,386
- First area, 2021: $1,737
- Second area, 2011: $2,031
- Second area, 2016: $2,268
- Second area, 2021: $2,717
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $180
- First area, 2016: $230
- First area, 2021: $280
- Second area, 2011: $309
- Second area, 2016: $360
- Second area, 2021: $431
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,500
- Second area, 2011: $1,950
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Upper Goulburn Valley with nearby areas
Compare Nillumbik - Kinglake with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Upper Goulburn Valley vs Nillumbik - Kinglake [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa3/20401/upper-goulburn-valley/vs/20903/nillumbik-kinglake