Compare
Lithgow - Mudgee vs Hawkesbury
Sub-region (SA3) comparison ≈ 108 km apart · Lithgow - Mudgee profile · Hawkesbury profile
Lithgow - Mudgee Hawkesbury
Lithgow - Mudgee and Hawkesbury are both New South Wales regions with significant rural footprints, but they differ sharply in wealth and layout. Hawkesbury is far wealthier, with a typical weekly household income of $2,230 compared to $1,332 in Lithgow - Mudgee. This gap is seen in the share of households earning $3,000 or more a week, which is 31.0% in Hawkesbury but only 15.6% in Lithgow - Mudgee. Lithgow - Mudgee is more walkable, with far more homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries (40.5% versus 13.2%) and health services (27.3% versus 9.7%).
These two areas are moving further apart in their working habits, as the gap in people working from home has widened significantly since 2011 to 15.5%. They do share some similarities, such as having almost the same proportion of children under 15 and very similar rates of volunteering. Both regions also have a population that is older than the national figure, though Lithgow - Mudgee is noticeably older, with a typical resident aged 44.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 43,919
- First area, 2016: 46,612
- First area, 2021: 47,870
- Second area, 2011: 24,074
- Second area, 2016: 24,588
- Second area, 2021: 25,006
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Lithgow - Mudgee: 0.9% males, 1.6% females; 85+ in Hawkesbury: 0.6% males, 0.7% females
- 80–84 in Lithgow - Mudgee: 1.3% males, 1.5% females; 80–84 in Hawkesbury: 0.8% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Lithgow - Mudgee: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 75–79 in Hawkesbury: 1.6% males, 1.6% females
- 70–74 in Lithgow - Mudgee: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 70–74 in Hawkesbury: 2.4% males, 2.3% females
- 65–69 in Lithgow - Mudgee: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 65–69 in Hawkesbury: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
- 60–64 in Lithgow - Mudgee: 3.6% males, 3.5% females; 60–64 in Hawkesbury: 3.6% males, 3.5% females
- 55–59 in Lithgow - Mudgee: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Hawkesbury: 3.7% males, 3.8% females
- 50–54 in Lithgow - Mudgee: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Hawkesbury: 3.9% males, 3.9% females
- 45–49 in Lithgow - Mudgee: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Hawkesbury: 3.4% males, 3.8% females
- 40–44 in Lithgow - Mudgee: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Hawkesbury: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 35–39 in Lithgow - Mudgee: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 35–39 in Hawkesbury: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Lithgow - Mudgee: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 30–34 in Hawkesbury: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 25–29 in Lithgow - Mudgee: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 25–29 in Hawkesbury: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 20–24 in Lithgow - Mudgee: 2.4% males, 2.1% females; 20–24 in Hawkesbury: 3.2% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Lithgow - Mudgee: 2.9% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Hawkesbury: 3.6% males, 3.3% females
- 10–14 in Lithgow - Mudgee: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Hawkesbury: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Lithgow - Mudgee: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 5–9 in Hawkesbury: 3.4% males, 2.9% females
- 0–4 in Lithgow - Mudgee: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Hawkesbury: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $446
- First area, 2016: $529
- First area, 2021: $667
- Second area, 2011: $641
- Second area, 2016: $762
- Second area, 2021: $889
- First area, 2011: $903
- First area, 2016: $1,054
- First area, 2021: $1,332
- Second area, 2011: $1,575
- Second area, 2016: $1,890
- Second area, 2021: $2,230
- First area, 2011: $1,181
- First area, 2016: $1,375
- First area, 2021: $1,819
- Second area, 2011: $1,722
- Second area, 2016: $2,038
- Second area, 2021: $2,375
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $180
- First area, 2016: $245
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $270
- Second area, 2016: $360
- Second area, 2021: $430
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,517
- First area, 2021: $1,600
- Second area, 2011: $2,156
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,308
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Lithgow - Mudgee with nearby areas
Compare Hawkesbury with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Lithgow - Mudgee vs Hawkesbury [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa3/10303/lithgow-mudgee/vs/11503/hawkesbury