Compare
Holder vs Denman Prospect
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 4.5 km apart · Holder profile · Denman Prospect profile
Holder Denman Prospect
Holder and Denman Prospect are neighbouring areas with similar population sizes, but they differ sharply in age and origin. Holder is much older, with a typical resident aged 41 and 19.6% of people aged 65 and over. In contrast, Denman Prospect is far younger, with a typical age of 31 and only 2.5% of residents aged 65 and over. Denman Prospect is also much more diverse and mobile; 41.8% of its residents were born overseas and 44.6% use a language other than English at home. Denman Prospect has seen massive growth, with its population rising by 100.8% since 2021, while 94.7% of residents moved there in the last five years.
Both areas are very similar in their overall advantage scores and the typical weekly rent of around $465 to $498. However, the way people live in their homes varies. Holder has far more separate houses and a higher share of homes owned outright (38.2%). Denman Prospect has far more people with bachelor degrees (59.5%) and a much higher share of households earning $3,000 or more a week (52.3%). Holder is also more walkable, with almost every home within 15 minutes of groceries and health services.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,711
- First area, 2016: 2,606
- First area, 2021: 2,816
- Second area, 2016: 0
- Second area, 2021: 2,759
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 31 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Holder: 0.8% males, 1.3% females; 85+ in Denman Prospect: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Holder: 1.2% males, 1.3% females; 80–84 in Denman Prospect: 0.2% males, 0.1% females
- 75–79 in Holder: 2.0% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Denman Prospect: 0.2% males, 0.1% females
- 70–74 in Holder: 2.6% males, 3.1% females; 70–74 in Denman Prospect: 0.5% males, 0.5% females
- 65–69 in Holder: 2.2% males, 2.1% females; 65–69 in Denman Prospect: 0.4% males, 0.8% females
- 60–64 in Holder: 2.0% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Denman Prospect: 0.8% males, 1.3% females
- 55–59 in Holder: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 55–59 in Denman Prospect: 1.5% males, 1.2% females
- 50–54 in Holder: 3.2% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Denman Prospect: 1.7% males, 1.7% females
- 45–49 in Holder: 3.6% males, 4.4% females; 45–49 in Denman Prospect: 2.9% males, 2.3% females
- 40–44 in Holder: 3.5% males, 3.9% females; 40–44 in Denman Prospect: 6.0% males, 4.6% females
- 35–39 in Holder: 3.9% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Denman Prospect: 6.1% males, 7.3% females
- 30–34 in Holder: 2.7% males, 3.4% females; 30–34 in Denman Prospect: 6.1% males, 7.0% females
- 25–29 in Holder: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Denman Prospect: 5.0% males, 6.3% females
- 20–24 in Holder: 2.1% males, 2.3% females; 20–24 in Denman Prospect: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Holder: 3.0% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Denman Prospect: 1.8% males, 2.1% females
- 10–14 in Holder: 3.6% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Denman Prospect: 2.9% males, 2.6% females
- 5–9 in Holder: 3.5% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in Denman Prospect: 5.2% males, 5.5% females
- 0–4 in Holder: 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 0–4 in Denman Prospect: 6.0% males, 3.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $915
- First area, 2016: $1,073
- First area, 2021: $1,273
- Second area, 2021: $1,655
- First area, 2011: $1,770
- First area, 2016: $2,039
- First area, 2021: $2,338
- Second area, 2021: $3,219
- First area, 2011: $2,195
- First area, 2016: $2,493
- First area, 2021: $2,915
- Second area, 2021: $3,606
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $371
- First area, 2016: $400
- First area, 2021: $465
- Second area, 2021: $498
- First area, 2011: $2,030
- First area, 2016: $2,008
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,400
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Holder with nearby areas
Compare Denman Prospect with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Holder vs Denman Prospect [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/801081094/holder/vs/801101136/denman-prospect