Compare
Rosebery - Bellamack vs Alligator
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 147 km apart · Rosebery - Bellamack profile · Alligator profile
Rosebery - Bellamack Alligator
Alligator and Rosebery - Bellamack are very different types of communities. Alligator is an older area where the typical resident is 47 and 18.5% of people are aged 65 or over. In contrast, Rosebery - Bellamack is much younger, with a typical age of 29 and children under 15 making up 26.8% of its population. There are also large gaps in income and education; the typical weekly household income in Rosebery - Bellamack is $2,376, which is $1,097 more than the typical $1,279 found in Alligator, and Year 12 completion is far higher in Rosebery - Bellamack at 56.6% compared to 32.2% in Alligator.
Since 2011, the gap between these two areas has generally grown, particularly regarding income and age. While the difference in the share of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents has narrowed, the gap in typical household income and the age of residents has widened. Despite these diverging trends, the two areas remain similar in some ways, such as their similar rates of volunteering and nearly identical average minimum and maximum temperatures.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,745
- First area, 2016: 6,678
- First area, 2021: 6,555
- Second area, 2011: 4,234
- Second area, 2016: 4,566
- Second area, 2021: 4,242
- First area, 2011: 26 yrs
- First area, 2016: 28 yrs
- First area, 2021: 29 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 47 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Rosebery - Bellamack: 0.1% males, 0.2% females; 85+ in Alligator: 0.2% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Rosebery - Bellamack: 0.2% males, 0.3% females; 80–84 in Alligator: 0.7% males, 0.3% females
- 75–79 in Rosebery - Bellamack: 0.3% males, 0.5% females; 75–79 in Alligator: 2.1% males, 0.9% females
- 70–74 in Rosebery - Bellamack: 0.5% males, 0.9% females; 70–74 in Alligator: 3.6% males, 2.5% females
- 65–69 in Rosebery - Bellamack: 1.1% males, 1.1% females; 65–69 in Alligator: 4.5% males, 3.9% females
- 60–64 in Rosebery - Bellamack: 1.3% males, 1.7% females; 60–64 in Alligator: 5.0% males, 3.7% females
- 55–59 in Rosebery - Bellamack: 1.8% males, 1.6% females; 55–59 in Alligator: 5.3% males, 4.5% females
- 50–54 in Rosebery - Bellamack: 2.7% males, 2.4% females; 50–54 in Alligator: 4.6% males, 4.4% females
- 45–49 in Rosebery - Bellamack: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Alligator: 4.5% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Rosebery - Bellamack: 3.6% males, 3.7% females; 40–44 in Alligator: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Rosebery - Bellamack: 4.4% males, 4.5% females; 35–39 in Alligator: 2.3% males, 3.1% females
- 30–34 in Rosebery - Bellamack: 5.0% males, 5.3% females; 30–34 in Alligator: 2.5% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in Rosebery - Bellamack: 4.4% males, 5.3% females; 25–29 in Alligator: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 20–24 in Rosebery - Bellamack: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 20–24 in Alligator: 2.3% males, 1.7% females
- 15–19 in Rosebery - Bellamack: 3.4% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in Alligator: 2.2% males, 2.2% females
- 10–14 in Rosebery - Bellamack: 4.5% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Alligator: 2.8% males, 2.3% females
- 5–9 in Rosebery - Bellamack: 4.7% males, 4.9% females; 5–9 in Alligator: 2.4% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Rosebery - Bellamack: 4.6% males, 4.3% females; 0–4 in Alligator: 2.6% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $1,024
- First area, 2016: $1,143
- First area, 2021: $1,194
- Second area, 2011: $618
- Second area, 2016: $674
- Second area, 2021: $690
- First area, 2011: $2,186
- First area, 2016: $2,454
- First area, 2021: $2,376
- Second area, 2011: $1,149
- Second area, 2016: $1,286
- Second area, 2021: $1,279
- First area, 2011: $2,235
- First area, 2016: $2,579
- First area, 2021: $2,615
- Second area, 2011: $1,421
- Second area, 2016: $1,564
- Second area, 2021: $1,461
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 3.1
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $450
- First area, 2016: $460
- First area, 2021: $400
- Second area, 2011: $50
- Second area, 2016: $70
- Second area, 2021: $100
- First area, 2011: $2,698
- First area, 2016: $2,600
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $1,408
- Second area, 2016: $1,500
- Second area, 2021: $1,430
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.30
- Second area, 2016: 1.10
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Rosebery - Bellamack with nearby areas
Compare Alligator with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Rosebery - Bellamack vs Alligator [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/701041043/rosebery-bellamack/vs/702031057/alligator