Compare
Derwent Park - Lutana vs Montrose - Rosetta
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 5.5 km apart · Derwent Park - Lutana profile · Montrose - Rosetta profile
Derwent Park - Lutana Montrose - Rosetta
Montrose - Rosetta and Derwent Park - Lutana are neighbouring areas in Tasmania with distinct profiles. Montrose - Rosetta is older, with a typical resident aged 41, and provides much better walking access to groceries (74.6%) and health services (57.1%). In contrast, Derwent Park - Lutana is younger, with a typical age of 35, and has a much higher share of renters at 40.3%. It also sees more recent overseas arrivals, who make up 29.9% of its population compared to 19.8% in Montrose - Rosetta.
Everyday life in both places shares many similarities, including an identical average of 2.4 people per home and nearly the same percentage of people who have served in the Defence Force. This common ground exists while some gaps shift; for example, the difference in typical age has narrowed from 8 years to 6 years since 2011. Both areas also sit below the national figure for weekly personal income, with typical earnings around $700.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,145
- First area, 2016: 4,148
- First area, 2021: 4,709
- Second area, 2011: 4,575
- Second area, 2016: 4,879
- Second area, 2021: 5,142
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Derwent Park - Lutana: 0.6% males, 1.1% females; 85+ in Montrose - Rosetta: 1.4% males, 2.1% females
- 80–84 in Derwent Park - Lutana: 1.0% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Montrose - Rosetta: 1.5% males, 1.8% females
- 75–79 in Derwent Park - Lutana: 1.4% males, 1.8% females; 75–79 in Montrose - Rosetta: 1.7% males, 2.4% females
- 70–74 in Derwent Park - Lutana: 1.8% males, 2.2% females; 70–74 in Montrose - Rosetta: 2.3% males, 2.7% females
- 65–69 in Derwent Park - Lutana: 2.7% males, 2.4% females; 65–69 in Montrose - Rosetta: 2.6% males, 3.4% females
- 60–64 in Derwent Park - Lutana: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 60–64 in Montrose - Rosetta: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Derwent Park - Lutana: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 55–59 in Montrose - Rosetta: 2.6% males, 3.2% females
- 50–54 in Derwent Park - Lutana: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 50–54 in Montrose - Rosetta: 2.6% males, 2.9% females
- 45–49 in Derwent Park - Lutana: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 45–49 in Montrose - Rosetta: 2.3% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Derwent Park - Lutana: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Montrose - Rosetta: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Derwent Park - Lutana: 4.1% males, 3.8% females; 35–39 in Montrose - Rosetta: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 30–34 in Derwent Park - Lutana: 5.3% males, 4.9% females; 30–34 in Montrose - Rosetta: 4.3% males, 3.8% females
- 25–29 in Derwent Park - Lutana: 5.9% males, 4.6% females; 25–29 in Montrose - Rosetta: 4.4% males, 3.9% females
- 20–24 in Derwent Park - Lutana: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 20–24 in Montrose - Rosetta: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Derwent Park - Lutana: 1.9% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Montrose - Rosetta: 2.7% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Derwent Park - Lutana: 2.5% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Montrose - Rosetta: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
- 5–9 in Derwent Park - Lutana: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in Montrose - Rosetta: 2.9% males, 2.5% females
- 0–4 in Derwent Park - Lutana: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Montrose - Rosetta: 2.5% males, 2.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $486
- First area, 2016: $558
- First area, 2021: $680
- Second area, 2011: $522
- Second area, 2016: $606
- Second area, 2021: $734
- First area, 2011: $852
- First area, 2016: $1,027
- First area, 2021: $1,301
- Second area, 2011: $945
- Second area, 2016: $1,144
- Second area, 2021: $1,434
- First area, 2011: $1,070
- First area, 2016: $1,251
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,233
- Second area, 2016: $1,456
- Second area, 2021: $1,761
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $228
- First area, 2016: $250
- First area, 2021: $325
- Second area, 2011: $215
- Second area, 2016: $250
- Second area, 2021: $350
- First area, 2011: $1,213
- First area, 2016: $1,213
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,365
- Second area, 2016: $1,322
- Second area, 2021: $1,448
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Derwent Park - Lutana with nearby areas
Compare Montrose - Rosetta with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Derwent Park - Lutana vs Montrose - Rosetta [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/601031016/derwent-park-lutana/vs/601031018/montrose-rosetta