Compare
Banjup vs South Lake - Cockburn Central
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 5.5 km apart · Banjup profile · South Lake - Cockburn Central profile
Banjup South Lake - Cockburn Central
Banjup and South Lake - Cockburn Central are neighbouring areas in Western Australia with very different profiles. Banjup is a wealthier area where 34.6% of households earn $3,000 or more a week, compared to 19.2% in South Lake - Cockburn Central. It is also more family-oriented, with 23.5% of people under 15 and a high share of large homes, as 95.1% have three or more bedrooms. In contrast, South Lake - Cockburn Central is much more connected to services, with far more public transport stops and a higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries (91.0% compared to 46.4% in Banjup).
Both areas are almost identical in the share of residents who have recently arrived from overseas, at around 8% each. This common ground exists alongside a widening gap in wealth and housing, as the difference in high-income households has grown since 2011. While Banjup is growing faster, with an 18.7% population increase since 2021, South Lake - Cockburn Central remains more accessible for those living alone, who make up 27.3% of its population compared to just 13.6% in Banjup.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 14,201
- First area, 2016: 17,533
- First area, 2021: 21,746
- Second area, 2011: 11,042
- Second area, 2016: 11,468
- Second area, 2021: 11,723
- First area, 2011: 30 yrs
- First area, 2016: 32 yrs
- First area, 2021: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 37 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Banjup: 0.3% males, 0.6% females; 85+ in South Lake - Cockburn Central: 0.7% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Banjup: 0.5% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in South Lake - Cockburn Central: 0.7% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Banjup: 0.6% males, 0.8% females; 75–79 in South Lake - Cockburn Central: 1.3% males, 1.2% females
- 70–74 in Banjup: 1.2% males, 1.2% females; 70–74 in South Lake - Cockburn Central: 1.7% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Banjup: 1.4% males, 1.6% females; 65–69 in South Lake - Cockburn Central: 2.6% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Banjup: 1.6% males, 1.8% females; 60–64 in South Lake - Cockburn Central: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 55–59 in Banjup: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 55–59 in South Lake - Cockburn Central: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Banjup: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in South Lake - Cockburn Central: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Banjup: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 45–49 in South Lake - Cockburn Central: 3.2% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Banjup: 4.1% males, 4.4% females; 40–44 in South Lake - Cockburn Central: 3.2% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Banjup: 4.5% males, 4.8% females; 35–39 in South Lake - Cockburn Central: 3.7% males, 3.3% females
- 30–34 in Banjup: 4.0% males, 4.7% females; 30–34 in South Lake - Cockburn Central: 4.2% males, 4.3% females
- 25–29 in Banjup: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 25–29 in South Lake - Cockburn Central: 4.3% males, 3.8% females
- 20–24 in Banjup: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 20–24 in South Lake - Cockburn Central: 3.9% males, 3.6% females
- 15–19 in Banjup: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in South Lake - Cockburn Central: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Banjup: 4.2% males, 3.7% females; 10–14 in South Lake - Cockburn Central: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 5–9 in Banjup: 4.0% males, 4.1% females; 5–9 in South Lake - Cockburn Central: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Banjup: 3.9% males, 3.7% females; 0–4 in South Lake - Cockburn Central: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $888
- First area, 2016: $874
- First area, 2021: $1,035
- Second area, 2011: $686
- Second area, 2016: $725
- Second area, 2021: $838
- First area, 2011: $2,107
- First area, 2016: $2,212
- First area, 2021: $2,456
- Second area, 2011: $1,429
- Second area, 2016: $1,524
- Second area, 2021: $1,715
- First area, 2011: $2,184
- First area, 2016: $2,289
- First area, 2021: $2,677
- Second area, 2011: $1,704
- Second area, 2016: $1,824
- Second area, 2021: $2,089
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.1
- First area, 2016: 3.1
- First area, 2021: 3.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $410
- First area, 2016: $430
- First area, 2021: $420
- Second area, 2011: $330
- Second area, 2016: $380
- Second area, 2021: $360
- First area, 2011: $2,310
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $1,733
- Second area, 2016: $1,759
- Second area, 2021: $1,680
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Banjup with nearby areas
Compare South Lake - Cockburn Central with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Banjup vs South Lake - Cockburn Central [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/507011148/banjup/vs/507011159/south-lake-cockburn-central