Compare
Iluka - Burns Beach vs Carramar
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 7.6 km apart · Iluka - Burns Beach profile · Carramar profile
Iluka - Burns Beach Carramar
Carramar and Iluka - Burns Beach are neighbouring areas in Western Australia with very different profiles. Carramar is much younger, with a typical resident aged 32, while the typical resident in Iluka - Burns Beach is 43. There are also large gaps in wealth and education; households earning $3,000 or more a week are far more common in Iluka - Burns Beach (48.9% compared to 23.8% in Carramar), and that area also has a far higher share of adults with a bachelor degree or higher (29.6% versus 18.0%).
Both areas share a similar housing style, with nearly all homes having three or more bedrooms and a similar number of people living in each house. These commonalities exist even as other gaps widen; for instance, the difference in home ownership is growing, with homes owned outright being far more common in Iluka - Burns Beach. Rental costs have also diverged, with typical weekly rent in Iluka - Burns Beach now $270 higher than in Carramar.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 6,165
- First area, 2016: 8,644
- First area, 2021: 9,737
- Second area, 2011: 11,332
- Second area, 2016: 16,616
- Second area, 2021: 18,641
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 28 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 32 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Iluka - Burns Beach: 0.2% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Carramar: 0.1% males, 0.2% females
- 80–84 in Iluka - Burns Beach: 0.4% males, 0.4% females; 80–84 in Carramar: 0.3% males, 0.3% females
- 75–79 in Iluka - Burns Beach: 0.8% males, 0.8% females; 75–79 in Carramar: 0.6% males, 0.5% females
- 70–74 in Iluka - Burns Beach: 1.8% males, 1.4% females; 70–74 in Carramar: 0.9% males, 1.0% females
- 65–69 in Iluka - Burns Beach: 2.7% males, 2.5% females; 65–69 in Carramar: 1.3% males, 1.4% females
- 60–64 in Iluka - Burns Beach: 3.9% males, 3.7% females; 60–64 in Carramar: 1.8% males, 1.9% females
- 55–59 in Iluka - Burns Beach: 4.9% males, 5.0% females; 55–59 in Carramar: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 50–54 in Iluka - Burns Beach: 5.2% males, 5.1% females; 50–54 in Carramar: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Iluka - Burns Beach: 4.2% males, 4.8% females; 45–49 in Carramar: 3.5% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Iluka - Burns Beach: 3.2% males, 3.7% females; 40–44 in Carramar: 3.5% males, 3.9% females
- 35–39 in Iluka - Burns Beach: 2.2% males, 2.6% females; 35–39 in Carramar: 4.3% males, 4.7% females
- 30–34 in Iluka - Burns Beach: 1.7% males, 1.9% females; 30–34 in Carramar: 4.0% males, 4.8% females
- 25–29 in Iluka - Burns Beach: 1.6% males, 1.5% females; 25–29 in Carramar: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 20–24 in Iluka - Burns Beach: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 20–24 in Carramar: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 15–19 in Iluka - Burns Beach: 4.4% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in Carramar: 3.7% males, 3.5% females
- 10–14 in Iluka - Burns Beach: 4.3% males, 3.8% females; 10–14 in Carramar: 4.0% males, 3.9% females
- 5–9 in Iluka - Burns Beach: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in Carramar: 4.6% males, 4.5% females
- 0–4 in Iluka - Burns Beach: 2.1% males, 2.1% females; 0–4 in Carramar: 3.9% males, 4.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $777
- First area, 2016: $911
- First area, 2021: $1,059
- Second area, 2011: $762
- Second area, 2016: $806
- Second area, 2021: $920
- First area, 2011: $2,588
- First area, 2016: $2,888
- First area, 2021: $3,272
- Second area, 2011: $1,759
- Second area, 2016: $1,902
- Second area, 2021: $2,116
- First area, 2011: $2,646
- First area, 2016: $2,961
- First area, 2021: $3,367
- Second area, 2011: $1,836
- Second area, 2016: $2,012
- Second area, 2021: $2,264
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.3
- First area, 2016: 3.2
- First area, 2021: 3.1
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 3.1
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $600
- First area, 2016: $646
- First area, 2021: $650
- Second area, 2011: $375
- Second area, 2016: $400
- Second area, 2021: $380
- First area, 2011: $2,600
- First area, 2016: $2,750
- First area, 2021: $2,763
- Second area, 2011: $2,300
- Second area, 2016: $2,123
- Second area, 2021: $1,907
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Iluka - Burns Beach with nearby areas
Compare Carramar with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Iluka - Burns Beach vs Carramar [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/505011076/iluka-burns-beach/vs/505031100/carramar