Compare
Port Augusta vs Roxby Downs
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 247 km apart · Port Augusta profile · Roxby Downs profile
Port Augusta Roxby Downs
Port Augusta and Roxby Downs are two distinct South Australian hubs with very different economic profiles. Roxby Downs is a high-earning area where the typical household earns $3,140 a week, compared to $1,277 in Port Augusta. This wealth is linked to the local industry, with mining accounting for 49.9% of jobs in Roxby Downs. In contrast, Port Augusta has a much larger First Nations community, making up 20.8% of the population, and a higher proportion of older residents, with 17.3% aged 65 and over compared to just 1.6% in Roxby Downs.
Income gaps between the two have widened since 2011, with the difference in typical household earnings growing to $1,863. Despite this, they share similar basics, such as a similar share of people who volunteer and roughly the same proportion of homes with three or more bedrooms. While Port Augusta has a much higher number of public transport stops, both areas have a similar level of population growth, which has remained flat or fallen slightly since 2021.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 13,658
- First area, 2016: 13,515
- First area, 2021: 13,515
- Second area, 2011: 4,717
- Second area, 2016: 3,888
- Second area, 2021: 3,976
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 29 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 31 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Port Augusta: 0.7% males, 1.1% females; 85+ in Roxby Downs: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Port Augusta: 1.1% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Roxby Downs: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Port Augusta: 1.7% males, 1.8% females; 75–79 in Roxby Downs: 0.2% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Port Augusta: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 70–74 in Roxby Downs: 0.2% males, 0.2% females
- 65–69 in Port Augusta: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 65–69 in Roxby Downs: 0.6% males, 0.4% females
- 60–64 in Port Augusta: 3.4% males, 2.9% females; 60–64 in Roxby Downs: 2.0% males, 1.4% females
- 55–59 in Port Augusta: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Roxby Downs: 3.1% males, 2.0% females
- 50–54 in Port Augusta: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Roxby Downs: 3.8% males, 2.3% females
- 45–49 in Port Augusta: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Roxby Downs: 4.0% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Port Augusta: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Roxby Downs: 4.5% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Port Augusta: 3.6% males, 2.9% females; 35–39 in Roxby Downs: 6.4% males, 4.7% females
- 30–34 in Port Augusta: 4.3% males, 3.2% females; 30–34 in Roxby Downs: 6.1% males, 5.2% females
- 25–29 in Port Augusta: 4.2% males, 3.7% females; 25–29 in Roxby Downs: 5.3% males, 5.0% females
- 20–24 in Port Augusta: 3.0% males, 2.5% females; 20–24 in Roxby Downs: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 15–19 in Port Augusta: 3.1% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Roxby Downs: 2.7% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Port Augusta: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 10–14 in Roxby Downs: 3.7% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Port Augusta: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Roxby Downs: 4.5% males, 5.1% females
- 0–4 in Port Augusta: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 0–4 in Roxby Downs: 4.3% males, 4.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $537
- First area, 2016: $600
- First area, 2021: $697
- Second area, 2011: $1,467
- Second area, 2016: $1,548
- Second area, 2021: $1,787
- First area, 2011: $981
- First area, 2016: $1,101
- First area, 2021: $1,277
- Second area, 2011: $2,753
- Second area, 2016: $2,477
- Second area, 2021: $3,140
- First area, 2011: $1,237
- First area, 2016: $1,365
- First area, 2021: $1,651
- Second area, 2011: $2,848
- Second area, 2016: $2,760
- Second area, 2021: $3,467
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $150
- First area, 2016: $180
- First area, 2021: $200
- Second area, 2011: $200
- Second area, 2016: $198
- Second area, 2021: $260
- First area, 2011: $1,200
- First area, 2016: $1,213
- First area, 2021: $1,138
- Second area, 2011: $2,323
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Port Augusta with nearby areas
Compare Roxby Downs with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Port Augusta vs Roxby Downs [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/406021142/port-augusta/vs/406021143/roxby-downs