Compare
Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour vs Port Lincoln
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 145 km apart · Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour profile · Port Lincoln profile
Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour Port Lincoln
Port Lincoln and Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour are two different types of South Australian hubs. Port Lincoln is more urban and connected, with 64% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport and far larger schools. In contrast, Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour is more rural, with a much higher share of people working in agriculture, forestry and fishing. There is a significant gap in First Nations outcomes; in Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour, the typical household income for First Nations people is $2,031, which is far higher than the $1,093 seen in Port Lincoln.
The two areas share a very similar social makeup, with almost identical typical weekly incomes and the same number of people per home. They also have a similar share of children under 15. Over time, some gaps have shifted; for example, the difference in the share of people who work from home has narrowed since 2011, while the gap in the share of people who own their homes outright has also decreased slightly.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,250
- First area, 2016: 4,247
- First area, 2021: 4,201
- Second area, 2011: 15,221
- Second area, 2016: 15,685
- Second area, 2021: 16,307
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour: 1.1% males, 1.9% females; 85+ in Port Lincoln: 1.0% males, 1.6% females
- 80–84 in Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour: 1.7% males, 1.2% females; 80–84 in Port Lincoln: 1.1% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 75–79 in Port Lincoln: 2.0% males, 1.9% females
- 70–74 in Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour: 3.9% males, 3.4% females; 70–74 in Port Lincoln: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour: 3.9% males, 3.4% females; 65–69 in Port Lincoln: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 60–64 in Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour: 4.7% males, 3.8% females; 60–64 in Port Lincoln: 3.3% males, 3.4% females
- 55–59 in Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Port Lincoln: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 50–54 in Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour: 3.3% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Port Lincoln: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour: 2.5% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Port Lincoln: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour: 3.1% males, 2.4% females; 40–44 in Port Lincoln: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 35–39 in Port Lincoln: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 30–34 in Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 30–34 in Port Lincoln: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour: 2.0% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Port Lincoln: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 20–24 in Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour: 2.0% males, 1.5% females; 20–24 in Port Lincoln: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour: 2.4% males, 1.5% females; 15–19 in Port Lincoln: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour: 3.5% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Port Lincoln: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour: 3.8% males, 3.5% females; 5–9 in Port Lincoln: 3.4% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour: 2.8% males, 2.4% females; 0–4 in Port Lincoln: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $514
- First area, 2016: $606
- First area, 2021: $687
- Second area, 2011: $529
- Second area, 2016: $615
- Second area, 2021: $736
- First area, 2011: $942
- First area, 2016: $1,105
- First area, 2021: $1,176
- Second area, 2011: $950
- Second area, 2016: $1,125
- Second area, 2021: $1,301
- First area, 2011: $1,193
- First area, 2016: $1,356
- First area, 2021: $1,456
- Second area, 2011: $1,236
- Second area, 2016: $1,434
- Second area, 2021: $1,750
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $100
- First area, 2016: $144
- First area, 2021: $160
- Second area, 2011: $180
- Second area, 2016: $220
- Second area, 2021: $240
- First area, 2011: $802
- First area, 2016: $910
- First area, 2021: $936
- Second area, 2011: $1,335
- Second area, 2016: $1,317
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour with nearby areas
Compare Port Lincoln with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kimba - Cleve - Franklin Harbour vs Port Lincoln [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/406011131/kimba-cleve-franklin-harbour/vs/406011133/port-lincoln