Compare
Moonta vs Port Lincoln
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 185 km apart · Moonta profile · Port Lincoln profile
Moonta Port Lincoln
Port Lincoln and Moonta are two South Australian towns with very different profiles. Moonta is far older, with a typical resident aged 59 and nearly 40% of the population aged 65 and over. Port Lincoln is younger, with a typical age of 41 and a higher share of children under 15. This younger demographic is reflected in the local infrastructure; Port Lincoln has far more schools and significantly better walkability, with 82% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park compared to 51% in Moonta. Port Lincoln also has a much larger workforce, with 58% of adults working or looking for work, while the figure in Moonta is 39%.
The gap in the age of residents has widened since 2011, growing from 14 to 18 years. Despite this increasing contrast, the two towns share some deep similarities. They have almost identical rates of volunteering and nearly the same percentage of people who speak a First Nations language. Typical weekly rents are also very similar, sitting around $240 in Port Lincoln and $250 in Moonta. Both areas have similar levels of overall advantage and access to money and resources when compared to other regions.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,238
- First area, 2016: 4,839
- First area, 2021: 5,217
- Second area, 2011: 15,221
- Second area, 2016: 15,685
- Second area, 2021: 16,307
- First area, 2011: 52 yrs
- First area, 2016: 55 yrs
- First area, 2021: 59 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Moonta: 1.6% males, 2.1% females; 85+ in Port Lincoln: 1.0% males, 1.6% females
- 80–84 in Moonta: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 80–84 in Port Lincoln: 1.1% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Moonta: 3.9% males, 3.8% females; 75–79 in Port Lincoln: 2.0% males, 1.9% females
- 70–74 in Moonta: 6.0% males, 5.4% females; 70–74 in Port Lincoln: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Moonta: 5.9% males, 5.8% females; 65–69 in Port Lincoln: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 60–64 in Moonta: 4.7% males, 5.0% females; 60–64 in Port Lincoln: 3.3% males, 3.4% females
- 55–59 in Moonta: 3.4% males, 3.9% females; 55–59 in Port Lincoln: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 50–54 in Moonta: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Port Lincoln: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Moonta: 1.8% males, 2.3% females; 45–49 in Port Lincoln: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Moonta: 1.8% males, 1.5% females; 40–44 in Port Lincoln: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Moonta: 1.6% males, 1.8% females; 35–39 in Port Lincoln: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 30–34 in Moonta: 1.9% males, 1.9% females; 30–34 in Port Lincoln: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Moonta: 1.9% males, 2.0% females; 25–29 in Port Lincoln: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 20–24 in Moonta: 1.3% males, 1.4% females; 20–24 in Port Lincoln: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Moonta: 2.0% males, 1.3% females; 15–19 in Port Lincoln: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Moonta: 2.4% males, 2.0% females; 10–14 in Port Lincoln: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Moonta: 1.8% males, 2.0% females; 5–9 in Port Lincoln: 3.4% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Moonta: 1.7% males, 1.9% females; 0–4 in Port Lincoln: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $386
- First area, 2016: $463
- First area, 2021: $536
- Second area, 2011: $529
- Second area, 2016: $615
- Second area, 2021: $736
- First area, 2011: $717
- First area, 2016: $857
- First area, 2021: $965
- Second area, 2011: $950
- Second area, 2016: $1,125
- Second area, 2021: $1,301
- First area, 2011: $875
- First area, 2016: $1,105
- First area, 2021: $1,256
- Second area, 2011: $1,236
- Second area, 2016: $1,434
- Second area, 2021: $1,750
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.1
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $200
- First area, 2016: $230
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2011: $180
- Second area, 2016: $220
- Second area, 2021: $240
- First area, 2011: $1,083
- First area, 2016: $1,192
- First area, 2021: $1,200
- Second area, 2011: $1,335
- Second area, 2016: $1,317
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Moonta with nearby areas
Compare Port Lincoln with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Moonta vs Port Lincoln [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/405041125/moonta/vs/406011133/port-lincoln