Compare
Panorama vs Coromandel Valley
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 5.8 km apart · Panorama profile · Coromandel Valley profile
Panorama Coromandel Valley
Panorama and Coromandel Valley are neighbouring areas with very different characters. Panorama is more multicultural, with 29.8% of people born overseas and 27.2% using a language other than English at home. It also has a higher proportion of people living alone (27.9%) and more rental properties. In contrast, Coromandel Valley is more affluent, with 31.3% of households earning $3,000 or more a week. It is dominated by large, separate houses, with 93.6% of homes having three or more bedrooms, and has a much higher share of people with no religion (59.5%).
The gap in household income between the two areas has widened since 2011. Despite this, they share a typical resident age of 41 and have nearly identical rates of full-time employment and home ownership. Panorama is significantly more walkable, with far more people living within a 15-minute walk of health services, groceries and schools than in Coromandel Valley.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 7,847
- First area, 2016: 8,068
- First area, 2021: 8,475
- Second area, 2011: 4,282
- Second area, 2016: 4,310
- Second area, 2021: 4,469
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Panorama: 2.0% males, 2.4% females; 85+ in Coromandel Valley: 0.4% males, 0.4% females
- 80–84 in Panorama: 1.5% males, 2.3% females; 80–84 in Coromandel Valley: 0.9% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in Panorama: 2.2% males, 2.6% females; 75–79 in Coromandel Valley: 1.9% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Panorama: 2.0% males, 3.2% females; 70–74 in Coromandel Valley: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 65–69 in Panorama: 2.3% males, 2.5% females; 65–69 in Coromandel Valley: 2.4% males, 3.0% females
- 60–64 in Panorama: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 60–64 in Coromandel Valley: 2.9% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Panorama: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 55–59 in Coromandel Valley: 3.2% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Panorama: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 50–54 in Coromandel Valley: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Panorama: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Coromandel Valley: 3.8% males, 4.2% females
- 40–44 in Panorama: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Coromandel Valley: 3.7% males, 4.3% females
- 35–39 in Panorama: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 35–39 in Coromandel Valley: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 30–34 in Panorama: 3.8% males, 3.9% females; 30–34 in Coromandel Valley: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 25–29 in Panorama: 3.8% males, 3.1% females; 25–29 in Coromandel Valley: 1.9% males, 1.6% females
- 20–24 in Panorama: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 20–24 in Coromandel Valley: 2.8% males, 2.4% females
- 15–19 in Panorama: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Coromandel Valley: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 10–14 in Panorama: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 10–14 in Coromandel Valley: 3.9% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in Panorama: 2.7% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Coromandel Valley: 3.9% males, 3.8% females
- 0–4 in Panorama: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in Coromandel Valley: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $526
- First area, 2016: $586
- First area, 2021: $759
- Second area, 2011: $745
- Second area, 2016: $790
- Second area, 2021: $978
- First area, 2011: $996
- First area, 2016: $1,211
- First area, 2021: $1,518
- Second area, 2011: $1,797
- Second area, 2016: $1,965
- Second area, 2021: $2,233
- First area, 2011: $1,280
- First area, 2016: $1,505
- First area, 2021: $2,053
- Second area, 2011: $1,991
- Second area, 2016: $2,146
- Second area, 2021: $2,481
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $245
- First area, 2016: $280
- First area, 2021: $310
- Second area, 2011: $300
- Second area, 2016: $360
- Second area, 2021: $420
- First area, 2011: $1,550
- First area, 2016: $1,625
- First area, 2021: $1,749
- Second area, 2011: $1,798
- Second area, 2016: $1,801
- Second area, 2021: $1,818
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Panorama with nearby areas
Compare Coromandel Valley with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Panorama vs Coromandel Valley [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/403031070/panorama/vs/403041076/coromandel-valley