Compare
Mitchell Park vs Panorama
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 2.5 km apart · Mitchell Park profile · Panorama profile
Mitchell Park Panorama
Mitchell Park and Panorama are neighbouring areas in South Australia that differ mainly in their housing and school access. Mitchell Park has a much higher share of renters at 39.2% and more diverse housing, while Panorama has far more separate houses (72.6%). Mitchell Park is also more geared toward education, with six schools and far more homes within a 15-minute walk of a school (94.9%) compared to 68.5% in Panorama. In contrast, Panorama is generally more affluent, with a higher share of households earning $3,000 or more per week (18.6%).
Since 2011, the gap in home ownership and typical age has widened, with Panorama becoming noticeably older and more likely to own its homes. Despite these shifting trends, the two areas remain very similar in other ways. They share nearly identical typical weekly rents of $310 and have almost the same number of public transport stops per 1,000 people. Both areas also have the same typical age for First Nations residents (25 years) and very similar rates of full-time employment.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 14,232
- First area, 2016: 15,151
- First area, 2021: 16,516
- Second area, 2011: 7,847
- Second area, 2016: 8,068
- Second area, 2021: 8,475
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mitchell Park: 1.2% males, 2.2% females; 85+ in Panorama: 2.0% males, 2.4% females
- 80–84 in Mitchell Park: 1.3% males, 1.8% females; 80–84 in Panorama: 1.5% males, 2.3% females
- 75–79 in Mitchell Park: 1.7% males, 2.2% females; 75–79 in Panorama: 2.2% males, 2.6% females
- 70–74 in Mitchell Park: 2.1% males, 2.3% females; 70–74 in Panorama: 2.0% males, 3.2% females
- 65–69 in Mitchell Park: 2.2% males, 2.9% females; 65–69 in Panorama: 2.3% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Mitchell Park: 2.4% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Panorama: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Mitchell Park: 2.4% males, 2.6% females; 55–59 in Panorama: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Mitchell Park: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 50–54 in Panorama: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
- 45–49 in Mitchell Park: 2.6% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Panorama: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Mitchell Park: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Panorama: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Mitchell Park: 3.8% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Panorama: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Mitchell Park: 4.3% males, 4.5% females; 30–34 in Panorama: 3.8% males, 3.9% females
- 25–29 in Mitchell Park: 4.4% males, 4.7% females; 25–29 in Panorama: 3.8% males, 3.1% females
- 20–24 in Mitchell Park: 3.7% males, 4.2% females; 20–24 in Panorama: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 15–19 in Mitchell Park: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Panorama: 2.5% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Mitchell Park: 2.4% males, 2.1% females; 10–14 in Panorama: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 5–9 in Mitchell Park: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 5–9 in Panorama: 2.7% males, 2.5% females
- 0–4 in Mitchell Park: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in Panorama: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $455
- First area, 2016: $519
- First area, 2021: $668
- Second area, 2011: $526
- Second area, 2016: $586
- Second area, 2021: $759
- First area, 2011: $864
- First area, 2016: $1,047
- First area, 2021: $1,307
- Second area, 2011: $996
- Second area, 2016: $1,211
- Second area, 2021: $1,518
- First area, 2011: $1,155
- First area, 2016: $1,377
- First area, 2021: $1,754
- Second area, 2011: $1,280
- Second area, 2016: $1,505
- Second area, 2021: $2,053
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $186
- First area, 2016: $270
- First area, 2021: $310
- Second area, 2011: $245
- Second area, 2016: $280
- Second area, 2021: $310
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,550
- First area, 2021: $1,603
- Second area, 2011: $1,550
- Second area, 2016: $1,625
- Second area, 2021: $1,749
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Mitchell Park with nearby areas
Compare Panorama with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mitchell Park vs Panorama [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/403021061/mitchell-park/vs/403031070/panorama