Compare
Golden Grove vs Barossa - Angaston
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 28 km apart · Golden Grove profile · Barossa - Angaston profile
Golden Grove Barossa - Angaston
Barossa - Angaston and Golden Grove are nearby South Australian areas with very different layouts. Golden Grove is far more urban, with a walkability score that is somewhat walkable, while Barossa - Angaston is mostly car-dependent. This is seen in the accessibility to essentials; for example, 80.7% of Golden Grove homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, compared to just 34.5% in Barossa - Angaston. Golden Grove also has a more diverse population, with 24.1% born overseas compared to 11.7% in Barossa - Angaston. In contrast, volunteering is far more common in Barossa - Angaston, where 25.6% of people volunteer, which is well above the national figure.
Everyday life in both places shares several common traits, as they have almost the same proportion of people aged 65 and over and a similar percentage of residents with no religion. They also have a similar number of schools and very similar typical weekly personal incomes. While the two areas differ in their connectivity and diversity, the gap in Year 12 completion rates has narrowed since 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 9,429
- First area, 2016: 10,342
- First area, 2021: 10,406
- Second area, 2011: 5,928
- Second area, 2016: 6,111
- Second area, 2021: 6,486
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Golden Grove: 1.1% males, 1.8% females; 85+ in Barossa - Angaston: 0.8% males, 0.7% females
- 80–84 in Golden Grove: 1.3% males, 1.8% females; 80–84 in Barossa - Angaston: 1.1% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Golden Grove: 1.9% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Barossa - Angaston: 2.0% males, 1.9% females
- 70–74 in Golden Grove: 2.4% males, 3.2% females; 70–74 in Barossa - Angaston: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 65–69 in Golden Grove: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Barossa - Angaston: 3.9% males, 3.5% females
- 60–64 in Golden Grove: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 60–64 in Barossa - Angaston: 4.3% males, 4.2% females
- 55–59 in Golden Grove: 3.7% males, 4.1% females; 55–59 in Barossa - Angaston: 3.6% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Golden Grove: 3.5% males, 3.9% females; 50–54 in Barossa - Angaston: 3.8% males, 4.1% females
- 45–49 in Golden Grove: 2.8% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Barossa - Angaston: 3.5% males, 3.8% females
- 40–44 in Golden Grove: 2.9% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Barossa - Angaston: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Golden Grove: 2.6% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Barossa - Angaston: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 30–34 in Golden Grove: 2.2% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Barossa - Angaston: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 25–29 in Golden Grove: 2.5% males, 2.0% females; 25–29 in Barossa - Angaston: 1.8% males, 2.0% females
- 20–24 in Golden Grove: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 20–24 in Barossa - Angaston: 2.7% males, 1.8% females
- 15–19 in Golden Grove: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 15–19 in Barossa - Angaston: 3.1% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Golden Grove: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Barossa - Angaston: 3.8% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Golden Grove: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Barossa - Angaston: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 0–4 in Golden Grove: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Barossa - Angaston: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $633
- First area, 2016: $704
- First area, 2021: $795
- Second area, 2011: $571
- Second area, 2016: $642
- Second area, 2021: $737
- First area, 2011: $1,427
- First area, 2016: $1,523
- First area, 2021: $1,674
- Second area, 2011: $1,109
- Second area, 2016: $1,244
- Second area, 2021: $1,441
- First area, 2011: $1,735
- First area, 2016: $1,876
- First area, 2021: $2,192
- Second area, 2011: $1,354
- Second area, 2016: $1,572
- Second area, 2021: $1,865
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $253
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $320
- Second area, 2011: $180
- Second area, 2016: $223
- Second area, 2021: $255
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $1,700
- First area, 2021: $1,688
- Second area, 2011: $1,400
- Second area, 2016: $1,408
- Second area, 2021: $1,500
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Golden Grove with nearby areas
Compare Barossa - Angaston with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Golden Grove vs Barossa - Angaston [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/402051049/golden-grove/vs/405011110/barossa-angaston