Compare
Mount Warren Park vs Bethania - Waterford
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 6.8 km apart · Mount Warren Park profile · Bethania - Waterford profile
Mount Warren Park Bethania - Waterford
Bethania - Waterford and Mount Warren Park are neighbouring areas with contrasting levels of accessibility and housing. Mount Warren Park is far more walkable, with 97.5% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport compared to 79.7% in Bethania - Waterford. It also has a far higher number of schools per 1,000 children (2.85 versus 1.25). In contrast, Bethania - Waterford is much more transient and diverse; 47.8% of residents moved there in the last five years, and 28.2% were born overseas. Rental properties are also far more common in Bethania - Waterford, where 36.4% of households rent, compared to 22.2% in Mount Warren Park.
Both areas sit very close to the national figure for the typical age of residents, which is 38 years. They also share similar levels of education, with about 12% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher. While they are alike in these ways, other gaps are changing; for example, the difference in rental rates has widened since 2011, and Mount Warren Park has become noticeably older than Bethania - Waterford over the same period.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,665
- First area, 2016: 5,791
- First area, 2021: 5,736
- Second area, 2011: 8,525
- Second area, 2016: 10,870
- Second area, 2021: 12,125
- First area, 2011: 36 yrs
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mount Warren Park: 1.2% males, 2.0% females; 85+ in Bethania - Waterford: 1.6% males, 2.8% females
- 80–84 in Mount Warren Park: 1.2% males, 1.6% females; 80–84 in Bethania - Waterford: 1.6% males, 2.4% females
- 75–79 in Mount Warren Park: 1.7% males, 2.0% females; 75–79 in Bethania - Waterford: 2.1% males, 3.0% females
- 70–74 in Mount Warren Park: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 70–74 in Bethania - Waterford: 2.4% males, 3.1% females
- 65–69 in Mount Warren Park: 2.4% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Bethania - Waterford: 1.8% males, 2.6% females
- 60–64 in Mount Warren Park: 2.8% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Bethania - Waterford: 1.9% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Mount Warren Park: 3.0% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Bethania - Waterford: 2.1% males, 2.3% females
- 50–54 in Mount Warren Park: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Bethania - Waterford: 2.0% males, 2.8% females
- 45–49 in Mount Warren Park: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Bethania - Waterford: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
- 40–44 in Mount Warren Park: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Bethania - Waterford: 2.6% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Mount Warren Park: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Bethania - Waterford: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Mount Warren Park: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 30–34 in Bethania - Waterford: 3.3% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Mount Warren Park: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Bethania - Waterford: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 20–24 in Mount Warren Park: 2.7% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in Bethania - Waterford: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 15–19 in Mount Warren Park: 3.3% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Bethania - Waterford: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Mount Warren Park: 3.3% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Bethania - Waterford: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Mount Warren Park: 2.8% males, 3.5% females; 5–9 in Bethania - Waterford: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Mount Warren Park: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 0–4 in Bethania - Waterford: 3.2% males, 3.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $591
- First area, 2016: $636
- First area, 2021: $735
- Second area, 2011: $533
- Second area, 2016: $604
- Second area, 2021: $682
- First area, 2011: $1,173
- First area, 2016: $1,310
- First area, 2021: $1,496
- Second area, 2011: $982
- Second area, 2016: $1,186
- Second area, 2021: $1,298
- First area, 2011: $1,412
- First area, 2016: $1,528
- First area, 2021: $1,824
- Second area, 2011: $1,212
- Second area, 2016: $1,426
- Second area, 2021: $1,579
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $310
- First area, 2016: $333
- First area, 2021: $340
- Second area, 2011: $320
- Second area, 2016: $360
- Second area, 2021: $355
- First area, 2011: $1,950
- First area, 2016: $1,690
- First area, 2021: $1,600
- Second area, 2011: $1,950
- Second area, 2016: $1,712
- Second area, 2021: $1,597
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Mount Warren Park with nearby areas
Compare Bethania - Waterford with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mount Warren Park vs Bethania - Waterford [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/311021309/mount-warren-park/vs/311051323/bethania-waterford