Compare
Eagleby vs Bethania - Waterford
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 5.9 km apart · Eagleby profile · Bethania - Waterford profile
Eagleby Bethania - Waterford
Eagleby and Bethania - Waterford are neighbouring areas with similar populations, but they differ in their level of advantage. Bethania - Waterford is far higher in overall advantage, access to money and resources, and job skills. It also has more high-income homes, with 10.2% earning $3,000 or more a week compared to 5.2% in Eagleby. In terms of local access, Bethania - Waterford is far higher for those within a 15-minute walk of groceries and health services. Conversely, Eagleby is far higher for those within a 15-minute walk of a school or public transport.
Since 2011, the gap in high-income households has widened, while the gap in renting has narrowed. Both areas share very similar home types, with about three-quarters being separate houses and most having three or more bedrooms. They also have nearly identical shares of people with no religion, around 41%. While both areas sit far below the national figure for bachelor degrees, Bethania - Waterford is well higher than Eagleby at 12.1% compared to 8.2%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 11,971
- First area, 2016: 13,326
- First area, 2021: 13,594
- Second area, 2011: 8,525
- Second area, 2016: 10,870
- Second area, 2021: 12,125
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 37 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Eagleby: 0.8% males, 1.0% females; 85+ in Bethania - Waterford: 1.6% males, 2.8% females
- 80–84 in Eagleby: 1.6% males, 1.8% females; 80–84 in Bethania - Waterford: 1.6% males, 2.4% females
- 75–79 in Eagleby: 2.5% males, 2.9% females; 75–79 in Bethania - Waterford: 2.1% males, 3.0% females
- 70–74 in Eagleby: 2.4% males, 3.3% females; 70–74 in Bethania - Waterford: 2.4% males, 3.1% females
- 65–69 in Eagleby: 2.3% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Bethania - Waterford: 1.8% males, 2.6% females
- 60–64 in Eagleby: 2.3% males, 2.5% females; 60–64 in Bethania - Waterford: 1.9% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Eagleby: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 55–59 in Bethania - Waterford: 2.1% males, 2.3% females
- 50–54 in Eagleby: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 50–54 in Bethania - Waterford: 2.0% males, 2.8% females
- 45–49 in Eagleby: 2.6% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Bethania - Waterford: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
- 40–44 in Eagleby: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in Bethania - Waterford: 2.6% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Eagleby: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Bethania - Waterford: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Eagleby: 3.4% males, 3.8% females; 30–34 in Bethania - Waterford: 3.3% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Eagleby: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 25–29 in Bethania - Waterford: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 20–24 in Eagleby: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 20–24 in Bethania - Waterford: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 15–19 in Eagleby: 2.7% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Bethania - Waterford: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Eagleby: 3.6% males, 3.5% females; 10–14 in Bethania - Waterford: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Eagleby: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 5–9 in Bethania - Waterford: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Eagleby: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Bethania - Waterford: 3.2% males, 3.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $440
- First area, 2016: $503
- First area, 2021: $586
- Second area, 2011: $533
- Second area, 2016: $604
- Second area, 2021: $682
- First area, 2011: $877
- First area, 2016: $956
- First area, 2021: $1,083
- Second area, 2011: $982
- Second area, 2016: $1,186
- Second area, 2021: $1,298
- First area, 2011: $962
- First area, 2016: $1,084
- First area, 2021: $1,289
- Second area, 2011: $1,212
- Second area, 2016: $1,426
- Second area, 2021: $1,579
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $290
- First area, 2016: $310
- First area, 2021: $320
- Second area, 2011: $320
- Second area, 2016: $360
- Second area, 2021: $355
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,336
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,950
- Second area, 2016: $1,712
- Second area, 2021: $1,597
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Eagleby with nearby areas
Compare Bethania - Waterford with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Eagleby vs Bethania - Waterford [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/311021307/eagleby/vs/311051323/bethania-waterford