Compare
Gracemere vs Rockhampton City
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 16 km apart · Gracemere profile · Rockhampton City profile
Gracemere Rockhampton City
Gracemere and Rockhampton City are nearby areas with very different profiles. Gracemere is a younger area where the typical resident is 33, while those in Rockhampton City are far older at 41. This age gap is reflected in the households; 26% of Gracemere residents are children under 15, compared to just 15% in Rockhampton City. Consequently, Gracemere has a much higher share of large homes, with 92.6% having three or more bedrooms, whereas only 53.7% of homes in Rockhampton City are that size. Weekly incomes are also far higher in Gracemere, where the typical household earns $1,713, compared to $1,061 in Rockhampton City.
Since 2011, the gaps in age, income, and the number of people living alone have all widened. Despite these drifting trends, the two areas share a similar proportion of First Nations people (around 11%) and similar levels of full-time employment. They also both struggle with public transport, with neither area having any recorded stops or departures per 1,000 people. However, the two differ sharply in convenience; most homes in Rockhampton City are within a 15-minute walk of groceries and health services, while only about a quarter of Gracemere residents have such easy access.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 8,870
- First area, 2016: 11,665
- First area, 2021: 12,379
- Second area, 2011: 3,637
- Second area, 2016: 3,262
- Second area, 2021: 3,364
- First area, 2011: 30 yrs
- First area, 2016: 30 yrs
- First area, 2021: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Gracemere: 0.4% males, 0.6% females; 85+ in Rockhampton City: 1.0% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Gracemere: 0.6% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Rockhampton City: 0.7% males, 1.5% females
- 75–79 in Gracemere: 1.1% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Rockhampton City: 1.6% males, 1.9% females
- 70–74 in Gracemere: 1.6% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Rockhampton City: 2.3% males, 1.9% females
- 65–69 in Gracemere: 2.0% males, 2.1% females; 65–69 in Rockhampton City: 3.4% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Gracemere: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Rockhampton City: 4.0% males, 3.2% females
- 55–59 in Gracemere: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 55–59 in Rockhampton City: 4.2% males, 3.5% females
- 50–54 in Gracemere: 2.3% males, 2.8% females; 50–54 in Rockhampton City: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Gracemere: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 45–49 in Rockhampton City: 3.4% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Gracemere: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Rockhampton City: 3.0% males, 2.5% females
- 35–39 in Gracemere: 3.9% males, 4.1% females; 35–39 in Rockhampton City: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 30–34 in Gracemere: 3.2% males, 4.1% females; 30–34 in Rockhampton City: 4.4% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Gracemere: 3.2% males, 3.8% females; 25–29 in Rockhampton City: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 20–24 in Gracemere: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 20–24 in Rockhampton City: 3.9% males, 4.1% females
- 15–19 in Gracemere: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in Rockhampton City: 3.0% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Gracemere: 4.4% males, 4.3% females; 10–14 in Rockhampton City: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 5–9 in Gracemere: 4.4% males, 4.6% females; 5–9 in Rockhampton City: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Gracemere: 4.4% males, 3.8% females; 0–4 in Rockhampton City: 2.7% males, 2.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $658
- First area, 2016: $673
- First area, 2021: $779
- Second area, 2011: $476
- Second area, 2016: $486
- Second area, 2021: $613
- First area, 2011: $1,495
- First area, 2016: $1,422
- First area, 2021: $1,713
- Second area, 2011: $872
- Second area, 2016: $892
- Second area, 2021: $1,061
- First area, 2011: $1,601
- First area, 2016: $1,526
- First area, 2021: $1,857
- Second area, 2011: $1,132
- Second area, 2016: $1,185
- Second area, 2021: $1,396
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.1
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $320
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $340
- Second area, 2011: $210
- Second area, 2016: $220
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2011: $1,950
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,200
- Second area, 2016: $1,127
- Second area, 2021: $1,073
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Gracemere with nearby areas
Compare Rockhampton City with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Gracemere vs Rockhampton City [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/308031210/gracemere/vs/308031217/rockhampton-city