Compare
Kenmore vs Chelmer - Graceville
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 3.9 km apart · Kenmore profile · Chelmer - Graceville profile
Kenmore Chelmer - Graceville
Kenmore and Chelmer - Graceville are neighbouring areas with distinct profiles. Chelmer - Graceville is more affluent, with a typical weekly household income of $3,172 compared to $2,493 in Kenmore. It is also much more walkable; 89.1% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, while only 54.4% of Kenmore homes have the same access. In contrast, Kenmore has a larger presence of people born overseas (32.8%) and a significantly larger school population, with 3,398 enrolments and an average school size of 850.
Since 2011, the gap in typical household income has widened from $298 to $679. Other trends show the divide in high-income households widening, while the gap in the share of overseas-born residents has narrowed. Despite these shifting trends, the two areas remain very alike in some ways. They share the same typical resident age of 40 and have nearly identical shares of children under 15 and people who completed Year 12.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 8,483
- First area, 2016: 8,765
- First area, 2021: 9,438
- Second area, 2011: 6,561
- Second area, 2016: 7,411
- Second area, 2021: 7,849
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 40 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kenmore: 1.1% males, 1.4% females; 85+ in Chelmer - Graceville: 0.9% males, 1.9% females
- 80–84 in Kenmore: 1.3% males, 1.8% females; 80–84 in Chelmer - Graceville: 0.7% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Kenmore: 1.8% males, 2.1% females; 75–79 in Chelmer - Graceville: 1.1% males, 1.4% females
- 70–74 in Kenmore: 1.7% males, 2.1% females; 70–74 in Chelmer - Graceville: 1.9% males, 2.3% females
- 65–69 in Kenmore: 1.7% males, 2.1% females; 65–69 in Chelmer - Graceville: 1.7% males, 2.0% females
- 60–64 in Kenmore: 2.2% males, 2.5% females; 60–64 in Chelmer - Graceville: 2.5% males, 2.6% females
- 55–59 in Kenmore: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 55–59 in Chelmer - Graceville: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 50–54 in Kenmore: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Chelmer - Graceville: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 45–49 in Kenmore: 3.7% males, 4.2% females; 45–49 in Chelmer - Graceville: 4.4% males, 4.4% females
- 40–44 in Kenmore: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 40–44 in Chelmer - Graceville: 3.7% males, 4.5% females
- 35–39 in Kenmore: 3.4% males, 3.9% females; 35–39 in Chelmer - Graceville: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
- 30–34 in Kenmore: 2.0% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Chelmer - Graceville: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 25–29 in Kenmore: 1.7% males, 1.6% females; 25–29 in Chelmer - Graceville: 1.9% males, 1.7% females
- 20–24 in Kenmore: 2.9% males, 2.3% females; 20–24 in Chelmer - Graceville: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Kenmore: 3.9% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in Chelmer - Graceville: 3.9% males, 3.7% females
- 10–14 in Kenmore: 4.2% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Chelmer - Graceville: 5.1% males, 4.1% females
- 5–9 in Kenmore: 4.1% males, 4.2% females; 5–9 in Chelmer - Graceville: 4.2% males, 3.8% females
- 0–4 in Kenmore: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 0–4 in Chelmer - Graceville: 2.8% males, 2.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $758
- First area, 2016: $833
- First area, 2021: $1,032
- Second area, 2011: $851
- Second area, 2016: $954
- Second area, 2021: $1,231
- First area, 2011: $1,916
- First area, 2016: $2,045
- First area, 2021: $2,493
- Second area, 2011: $2,214
- Second area, 2016: $2,447
- Second area, 2021: $3,172
- First area, 2011: $2,196
- First area, 2016: $2,321
- First area, 2021: $2,912
- Second area, 2011: $2,620
- Second area, 2016: $2,902
- Second area, 2021: $3,665
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $413
- First area, 2016: $460
- First area, 2021: $510
- Second area, 2011: $400
- Second area, 2016: $460
- Second area, 2021: $490
- First area, 2011: $2,045
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,200
- Second area, 2011: $2,300
- Second area, 2016: $2,485
- Second area, 2021: $2,800
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Kenmore with nearby areas
Compare Chelmer - Graceville with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kenmore vs Chelmer - Graceville [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/304021090/kenmore/vs/304031092/chelmer-graceville