Compare

Fig Tree Pocket vs Chelmer - Graceville

Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 1.7 km apart · Fig Tree Pocket profile · Chelmer - Graceville profile

Fig Tree Pocket Chelmer - Graceville

Chelmer - Graceville and Fig Tree Pocket are neighbouring areas in Brisbane with very different layouts. Chelmer - Graceville is very walkable, with 99.4% of homes having a 15-minute-city walkshed and a walkability score of 7.4 (very walkable). In contrast, Fig Tree Pocket is mostly car-dependent with a score of 3.8, and only 0.6% of homes have a similar walkshed. This difference extends to basic services; 89.1% of Chelmer - Graceville homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, while only 5.6% of homes in Fig Tree Pocket are.

Both areas sit close to the national figure for the share of people who speak little or no English. They are also very similar in other ways, such as having the same typical resident age of 40 and a similar share of children under 15. While Fig Tree Pocket has a higher share of people born overseas (33.5% compared to 24.5%), the gap between them has remained steady since 2011. Other gaps are closing, with the difference in the share of households that rent narrowing over the last decade.

Where they differ most

Demographics & Identity

Population in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +3,504 larger in Chelmer - Graceville gap widening
4,345 18th pct 7,849 40th pct
  • First area, 2011: 3,652
  • First area, 2016: 4,045
  • First area, 2021: 4,345
  • Second area, 2011: 6,561
  • Second area, 2016: 7,411
  • Second area, 2021: 7,849
Median age in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville even gap narrowing
40 yrs 52nd pct 40 yrs 52nd pct
  • First area, 2011: 40 yrs
  • First area, 2016: 40 yrs
  • First area, 2021: 40 yrs
  • Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
  • Second area, 2016: 37 yrs
  • Second area, 2021: 40 yrs
First Nations in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +0.4 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap steady
0.8% 23rd pct 0.4% 9th pct
  • First area, 2011: 0.2%
  • First area, 2016: 0.1%
  • First area, 2021: 0.8%
  • Second area, 2011: 0.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 0.4%
  • Second area, 2021: 0.4%
Aged 65+ in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +2.1 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville gap steady
12.8% 25th pct 14.8% 35th pct
  • First area, 2011: 10.4%
  • First area, 2016: 12.2%
  • First area, 2021: 12.8%
  • Second area, 2011: 12.2%
  • Second area, 2016: 12.8%
  • Second area, 2021: 14.8%
Under 15 in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +0.2 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap narrowing
22.8% 88th pct 22.5% 87th pct
  • First area, 2011: 24.5%
  • First area, 2016: 23.8%
  • First area, 2021: 22.8%
  • Second area, 2011: 22.5%
  • Second area, 2016: 23.0%
  • Second area, 2021: 22.5%
De facto in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +2.0 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville gap narrowing
5.8% 7th pct 7.8% 15th pct
  • First area, 2011: 4.1%
  • First area, 2016: 6.2%
  • First area, 2021: 5.8%
  • Second area, 2011: 7.2%
  • Second area, 2016: 7.7%
  • Second area, 2021: 7.8%

Age structure

29.5% Older adults (45–64) ◂ +2.1 pts 27.4%
22.8% Children (0–14) ◂ +0.2 pts 22.5%
20.0% Young adults (25–44) +2.0 pts ▸ 22.0%
14.9% Youth (15–24) ◂ +1.5 pts 13.4%
12.8% Seniors (65+) +2.1 pts ▸ 14.8%

Marital status

61.4% Married ◂ +5.3 pts 56.1%
28.4% Never married +2.0 pts ▸ 30.4%
6.0% Divorced +0.2 pts ▸ 6.1%
2.4% Widowed +2.5 pts ▸ 4.9%
1.7% Separated +0.6 pts ▸ 2.3%

Age & sex structure

Fig Tree Pocket Chelmer - Graceville

Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.

  • 85+ in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.5% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Chelmer - Graceville: 0.9% males, 1.9% females
  • 80–84 in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.9% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Chelmer - Graceville: 0.7% males, 0.9% females
  • 75–79 in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.9% males, 1.4% females; 75–79 in Chelmer - Graceville: 1.1% males, 1.4% females
  • 70–74 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.9% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in Chelmer - Graceville: 1.9% males, 2.3% females
  • 65–69 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.0% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Chelmer - Graceville: 1.7% males, 2.0% females
  • 60–64 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 60–64 in Chelmer - Graceville: 2.5% males, 2.6% females
  • 55–59 in Fig Tree Pocket: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Chelmer - Graceville: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
  • 50–54 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.6% males, 4.1% females; 50–54 in Chelmer - Graceville: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
  • 45–49 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.1% males, 4.9% females; 45–49 in Chelmer - Graceville: 4.4% males, 4.4% females
  • 40–44 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.0% males, 4.7% females; 40–44 in Chelmer - Graceville: 3.7% males, 4.5% females
  • 35–39 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.4% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Chelmer - Graceville: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
  • 30–34 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.3% males, 1.6% females; 30–34 in Chelmer - Graceville: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
  • 25–29 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.4% males, 1.2% females; 25–29 in Chelmer - Graceville: 1.9% males, 1.7% females
  • 20–24 in Fig Tree Pocket: 3.3% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Chelmer - Graceville: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
  • 15–19 in Fig Tree Pocket: 5.0% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in Chelmer - Graceville: 3.9% males, 3.7% females
  • 10–14 in Fig Tree Pocket: 5.4% males, 4.7% females; 10–14 in Chelmer - Graceville: 5.1% males, 4.1% females
  • 5–9 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.2% males, 3.9% females; 5–9 in Chelmer - Graceville: 4.2% males, 3.8% females
  • 0–4 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.7% males, 1.9% females; 0–4 in Chelmer - Graceville: 2.8% males, 2.4% females

Ancestry & Birthplace

Born overseas in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +9.0 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap steady
33.5% 74th pct 24.5% 56th pct
  • First area, 2011: 28.3%
  • First area, 2016: 30.2%
  • First area, 2021: 33.5%
  • Second area, 2011: 19.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 21.9%
  • Second area, 2021: 24.5%

Country of birth

64.7% Australia +8.7 pts ▸ 73.4%
6.0% England ◂ +0.8 pts 5.2%
4.3% South Africa ◂ +2.7 pts 1.6%
2.8% India ◂ +1.6 pts 1.2%
2.5% New Zealand even 2.4%
2.4% China ◂ +1.0 pts 1.3%
0.5% Vietnam +0.4 pts ▸ 0.9%
0.5% Philippines ◂ +0.3 pts 0.3%
0.2% Italy ◂ +0.1 pts 0.1%
0.0% Nepal even 0.0%

Ancestry

39.5% English +2.1 pts ▸ 41.5%
28.8% Australian +5.1 pts ▸ 33.9%
12.9% Irish +2.9 pts ▸ 15.8%
12.2% Scottish +2.6 pts ▸ 14.8%
6.4% German ◂ +0.9 pts 5.4%
6.2% Chinese ◂ +1.6 pts 4.6%
5.0% Indian ◂ +3.3 pts 1.7%
2.7% Italian +0.4 pts ▸ 3.1%
1.5% Dutch +0.4 pts ▸ 1.9%
1.0% Vietnamese +0.5 pts ▸ 1.5%
0.7% Greek +0.2 pts ▸ 0.9%
0.6% Filipino even 0.6%

Language

Other language in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +4.5 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap widening
17.0% 59th pct 12.5% 50th pct
  • First area, 2011: 9.4%
  • First area, 2016: 12.3%
  • First area, 2021: 17.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 7.2%
  • Second area, 2016: 9.5%
  • Second area, 2021: 12.5%
Limited English in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +0.4 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap steady
1.3% 49th pct 0.9% 40th pct
  • First area, 2016: 0.7%
  • First area, 2021: 1.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 0.8%
  • Second area, 2021: 0.9%

Language used at home

81.1% English only +3.5 pts ▸ 84.7%
3.3% Mandarin ◂ +1.3 pts 2.1%
1.2% Hindi ◂ +0.8 pts 0.4%
0.6% Vietnamese +0.5 pts ▸ 1.1%
0.7% Cantonese even 0.8%
0.3% Italian ◂ +0.1 pts 0.2%
0.2% Punjabi ◂ +0.1 pts 0.1%
0.1% Greek even 0.2%
0.2% Arabic ◂ +0.1 pts 0.0%
0.1% Tagalog even 0.1%

Religion

No religion in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +1.0 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville gap narrowing
41.2% 49th pct 42.1% 54th pct
  • First area, 2011: 22.8%
  • First area, 2016: 31.9%
  • First area, 2021: 41.2%
  • Second area, 2011: 25.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 33.0%
  • Second area, 2021: 42.1%

Religious affiliation

47.9% Christianity +1.8 pts ▸ 49.6%
41.2% No religion +1.0 pts ▸ 42.1%
4.4% Hinduism ◂ +2.9 pts 1.4%
3.5% Not stated +0.5 pts ▸ 4.0%
1.5% Buddhism +0.1 pts ▸ 1.6%
1.1% Islam ◂ +0.6 pts 0.5%
0.4% Other religions +0.2 pts ▸ 0.7%
0.3% Judaism even 0.3%

Education & Qualifications

Year 12 in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +2.0 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap steady
86.3% 100th pct 84.2% 99th pct
  • First area, 2011: 78.4%
  • First area, 2016: 80.8%
  • First area, 2021: 86.3%
  • Second area, 2011: 76.1%
  • Second area, 2016: 79.8%
  • Second area, 2021: 84.2%
Bachelor+ in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +1.5 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap steady
53.5% 97th pct 52.0% 95th pct
  • First area, 2011: 43.6%
  • First area, 2016: 47.7%
  • First area, 2021: 53.5%
  • Second area, 2011: 44.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 46.7%
  • Second area, 2021: 52.0%
3 43rd pct 3 43rd pct
Schools/1k kids in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +1.34 more in Fig Tree Pocket
3.03 69th pct 1.70 38th pct
Schools ≤3 km in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +5 more in Chelmer - Graceville
27 64th pct 32 73rd pct
Students in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +345 more in Chelmer - Graceville
889 33rd pct 1,234 44th pct
Avg size in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +115 larger in Chelmer - Graceville
296 32nd pct 411 48th pct
ICSEA in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +54 higher in Fig Tree Pocket
1,139 94th pct 1,085 78th pct

Highest year of school

86.3% Year 12 ◂ +2.0 pts 84.2%
6.6% Year 10 +1.3 pts ▸ 7.9%
3.0% Year 11 ◂ +0.2 pts 2.9%
1.7% Year 9 or below +0.1 pts ▸ 1.8%

Highest qualification level

43.0% Bachelor degree +0.4 pts ▸ 43.4%
23.4% Postgraduate degree ◂ +4.3 pts 19.1%
12.4% Advanced diploma / diploma ◂ +1.4 pts 11.0%
8.2% Certificate III / IV +1.4 pts ▸ 9.6%
5.3% Graduate diploma / certificate +1.8 pts ▸ 7.1%
1.0% Certificate I / II ◂ +0.3 pts 0.7%

Field of qualification

24.6% Management & commerce ◂ +0.7 pts 24.0%
16.9% Health ◂ +3.8 pts 13.1%
12.9% Society & culture +1.7 pts ▸ 14.6%
11.3% Engineering & related even 11.3%
7.9% Education +0.8 pts ▸ 8.7%
5.9% Natural & physical sciences ◂ +0.4 pts 5.5%
3.8% Creative arts +0.8 pts ▸ 4.5%
3.8% Architecture & building +0.5 pts ▸ 4.3%
4.2% Information technology ◂ +0.6 pts 3.6%
2.1% Food, hospitality & personal services ◂ +0.1 pts 2.0%
1.3% Agriculture & environment even 1.3%

Income

Personal income in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +$26 higher in Chelmer - Graceville gap widening
$1,205 89th pct $1,231 90th pct
  • First area, 2011: $863
  • First area, 2016: $1,005
  • First area, 2021: $1,205
  • Second area, 2011: $851
  • Second area, 2016: $954
  • Second area, 2021: $1,231
Household income in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +$619 higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap widening
$3,791 100th pct $3,172 100th pct
  • First area, 2011: $2,706
  • First area, 2016: $3,038
  • First area, 2021: $3,791
  • Second area, 2011: $2,214
  • Second area, 2016: $2,447
  • Second area, 2021: $3,172
Family income in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +$561 higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap widening
$4,226 100th pct $3,665 98th pct
  • First area, 2011: $2,798
  • First area, 2016: $3,313
  • First area, 2021: $4,226
  • Second area, 2011: $2,620
  • Second area, 2016: $2,902
  • Second area, 2021: $3,665
High earners in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +2.6 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap steady
31.9% 100th pct 29.3% 97th pct
  • First area, 2011: 21.7%
  • First area, 2016: 25.1%
  • First area, 2021: 31.9%
  • Second area, 2011: 18.7%
  • Second area, 2016: 21.2%
  • Second area, 2021: 29.3%
High-income homes in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +6.8 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap steady
56.3% 100th pct 49.5% 100th pct
  • First area, 2011: 33.4%
  • First area, 2016: 44.3%
  • First area, 2021: 56.3%
  • Second area, 2011: 26.0%
  • Second area, 2016: 35.8%
  • Second area, 2021: 49.5%

Household income distribution

45.3% $4,000 or more ◂ +9.6 pts 35.7%
19.8% $1,500–$2,999 +3.1 pts ▸ 22.8%
12.6% $650–$1,499 +1.2 pts ▸ 13.8%
11.0% $3,000–$3,999 +2.8 pts ▸ 13.8%
6.1% Under $650 +1.5 pts ▸ 7.6%

Personal income distribution

33.4% Under $650 ◂ +2.3 pts 31.1%
22.1% $1,500–$2,999 +2.4 pts ▸ 24.6%
21.6% $650–$1,499 +1.4 pts ▸ 22.9%
20.1% $3,000 or more ◂ +3.4 pts 16.7%

Health & Disability

Health condition in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +3.2 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville
21.7% 15th pct 24.9% 29th pct
Mental health in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +2.3 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville
6.0% 17th pct 8.3% 43rd pct
Needs assistance in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +1.7 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville gap widening
3.0% 11th pct 4.7% 36th pct
  • First area, 2011: 2.9%
  • First area, 2016: 3.1%
  • First area, 2021: 3.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 3.0%
  • Second area, 2016: 3.5%
  • Second area, 2021: 4.7%

Long-term health conditions reported

7.1% Other condition +1.4 pts ▸ 8.5%
6.0% Mental health +2.3 pts ▸ 8.3%
7.0% Asthma +0.6 pts ▸ 7.6%
5.8% Arthritis +0.1 pts ▸ 6.0%
3.2% Heart disease +0.3 pts ▸ 3.5%
2.7% Cancer +0.5 pts ▸ 3.2%
2.2% Diabetes +0.1 pts ▸ 2.3%
0.4% Dementia +1.2 pts ▸ 1.6%
0.9% Lung condition +0.4 pts ▸ 1.3%
0.4% Stroke +0.4 pts ▸ 0.8%

Number of long-term health conditions

74.0% None ◂ +3.3 pts 70.7%
16.6% One condition +1.7 pts ▸ 18.3%
3.8% Two conditions +0.7 pts ▸ 4.5%
1.5% Three or more +0.8 pts ▸ 2.2%

Community Participation

Volunteering in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville even gap narrowing
22.9% 90th pct 22.8% 90th pct
  • First area, 2011: 28.7%
  • First area, 2016: 27.8%
  • First area, 2021: 22.9%
  • Second area, 2011: 29.8%
  • Second area, 2016: 28.6%
  • Second area, 2021: 22.8%
Unpaid carers in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +0.5 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville gap steady
12.3% 51st pct 12.8% 60th pct
  • First area, 2011: 11.4%
  • First area, 2016: 11.2%
  • First area, 2021: 12.3%
  • Second area, 2011: 10.6%
  • Second area, 2016: 10.5%
  • Second area, 2021: 12.8%
Unpaid child care in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +2.5 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap steady
36.4% 94th pct 33.9% 89th pct
  • First area, 2011: 37.0%
  • First area, 2016: 38.1%
  • First area, 2021: 36.4%
  • Second area, 2011: 34.9%
  • Second area, 2016: 35.5%
  • Second area, 2021: 33.9%
Defence service in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +0.4 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket
3.7% 73rd pct 3.3% 63rd pct
Housework 15h+ in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +1.7 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap steady
25.7% 86th pct 23.9% 75th pct
  • First area, 2011: 27.2%
  • First area, 2016: 25.2%
  • First area, 2021: 25.7%
  • Second area, 2011: 25.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 22.3%
  • Second area, 2021: 23.9%

First Nations

First Nations people in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +2 larger in Fig Tree Pocket
36 11th pct 34 11th pct
Median age in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +13 yrs older in Chelmer - Graceville
14 yrs 0th pct 27 yrs 71st pct
— 80.0% 99th pct
Median income in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +$187 higher in Fig Tree Pocket
$1,624 100th pct $1,437 100th pct
Household income in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +$625 higher in Fig Tree Pocket
$3,250 98th pct $2,625 89th pct
Indigenous language in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +8.3 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket
8.3% 72nd pct 0.0% 0th pct

Family & Households

Household size in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +0.3 larger in Fig Tree Pocket gap narrowing
3.2 94th pct 2.9 86th pct
  • First area, 2011: 3.2
  • First area, 2016: 3.1
  • First area, 2021: 3.2
  • Second area, 2011: 2.8
  • Second area, 2016: 2.9
  • Second area, 2021: 2.9
One-parent in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +1.5 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville gap steady
7.6% 4th pct 9.1% 13th pct
  • First area, 2011: 7.8%
  • First area, 2016: 8.1%
  • First area, 2021: 7.6%
  • Second area, 2011: 8.5%
  • Second area, 2016: 8.9%
  • Second area, 2021: 9.1%
Living alone in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +6.7 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville gap narrowing
9.4% 0th pct 16.1% 14th pct
  • First area, 2011: 9.7%
  • First area, 2016: 10.3%
  • First area, 2021: 9.4%
  • Second area, 2011: 18.8%
  • Second area, 2016: 17.3%
  • Second area, 2021: 16.1%

Family composition

75.3% Couples with children ◂ +4.0 pts 71.3%
16.9% Couples without children +1.9 pts ▸ 18.8%
7.6% One-parent families +1.5 pts ▸ 9.1%
0.4% Other families +0.3 pts ▸ 0.6%

Household size

29.7% 4 people ◂ +5.0 pts 24.7%
27.7% 2 people +2.0 pts ▸ 29.6%
18.7% 3 people ◂ +1.8 pts 16.9%
9.4% 1 person +6.7 pts ▸ 16.1%
11.5% 5 people ◂ +1.4 pts 10.1%
2.9% 6 or more ◂ +0.2 pts 2.7%

Housing & Dwellings

Rent in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +$100 higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap widening
$590 97th pct $490 87th pct
  • First area, 2011: $475
  • First area, 2016: $540
  • First area, 2021: $590
  • Second area, 2011: $400
  • Second area, 2016: $460
  • Second area, 2021: $490
Mortgage in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +$233 higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap narrowing
$3,033 96th pct $2,800 92nd pct
  • First area, 2011: $2,600
  • First area, 2016: $2,815
  • First area, 2021: $3,033
  • Second area, 2011: $2,300
  • Second area, 2016: $2,485
  • Second area, 2021: $2,800
People / bedroom in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville even gap narrowing
0.80 29th pct 0.80 29th pct
  • First area, 2011: 1.00
  • First area, 2016: 0.80
  • First area, 2021: 0.80
  • Second area, 2011: 1.10
  • Second area, 2016: 0.80
  • Second area, 2021: 0.80
Renting in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +5.8 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville gap narrowing
13.2% 10th pct 19.0% 25th pct
  • First area, 2011: 12.3%
  • First area, 2016: 12.5%
  • First area, 2021: 13.2%
  • Second area, 2011: 21.7%
  • Second area, 2016: 21.8%
  • Second area, 2021: 19.0%
Owned outright in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +5.2 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap narrowing
41.8% 80th pct 36.6% 64th pct
  • First area, 2011: 43.0%
  • First area, 2016: 42.8%
  • First area, 2021: 41.8%
  • Second area, 2011: 36.7%
  • Second area, 2016: 35.7%
  • Second area, 2021: 36.6%
Separate houses in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +8.9 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap widening
99.4% 100th pct 90.5% 66th pct
  • First area, 2011: 98.9%
  • First area, 2016: 100.0%
  • First area, 2021: 99.4%
  • Second area, 2011: 91.2%
  • Second area, 2016: 90.0%
  • Second area, 2021: 90.5%
3+ bedrooms in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +8.0 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap narrowing
97.9% 100th pct 89.9% 81st pct
  • First area, 2011: 96.1%
  • First area, 2016: 98.0%
  • First area, 2021: 97.9%
  • Second area, 2011: 86.6%
  • Second area, 2016: 87.5%
  • Second area, 2021: 89.9%

How homes are owned or rented

43.8% Owned with a mortgage ◂ +1.0 pts 42.8%
41.8% Owned outright ◂ +5.2 pts 36.6%
13.2% Rented +5.8 pts ▸ 19.0%
0.4% Other tenure +0.8 pts ▸ 1.2%
0.4% Not stated +0.1 pts ▸ 0.5%

Types of homes

99.4% Separate house ◂ +8.9 pts 90.5%
0.0% Townhouse / semi-detached +5.1 pts ▸ 5.1%
0.6% Flat or apartment +3.8 pts ▸ 4.4%
0.0% Other dwelling even 0.0%

Bedrooms per home

44.9% 4 bedrooms ◂ +10.7 pts 34.2%
20.9% 3 bedrooms +13.7 pts ▸ 34.6%
32.0% 5 or more ◂ +11.0 pts 21.0%
1.9% 2 bedrooms +6.3 pts ▸ 8.2%
0.0% 1 bedroom +1.6 pts ▸ 1.6%
0.0% Studio / none +0.2 pts ▸ 0.2%

Weekly rent distribution

23.0% $350–$549 +23.1 pts ▸ 46.1%
33.1% $550–$749 ◂ +14.2 pts 18.9%
29.2% $750 or more ◂ +11.7 pts 17.5%
5.6% $200–$349 +5.1 pts ▸ 10.7%
3.9% Under $200 ◂ +1.9 pts 2.1%

Monthly mortgage distribution

50.5% $3,000 or more ◂ +7.7 pts 42.8%
21.8% $1,800–$2,999 +4.1 pts ▸ 25.9%
11.0% $1,000–$1,799 +2.6 pts ▸ 13.6%
9.3% Under $1,000 +1.1 pts ▸ 10.4%

Transport & Vehicles

No car in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +1.6 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville gap narrowing
1.9% 15th pct 3.5% 36th pct
  • First area, 2011: 1.2%
  • First area, 2016: 1.2%
  • First area, 2021: 1.9%
  • Second area, 2011: 5.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 3.4%
  • Second area, 2021: 3.5%
Work from home in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +0.9 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville gap steady
32.2% 84th pct 33.1% 86th pct
  • First area, 2011: 7.1%
  • First area, 2016: 9.0%
  • First area, 2021: 32.2%
  • Second area, 2011: 6.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 7.2%
  • Second area, 2021: 33.1%
PT commute in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +4.3 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville gap narrowing
1.9% 50th pct 6.2% 88th pct
  • First area, 2011: 6.4%
  • First area, 2016: 5.3%
  • First area, 2021: 1.9%
  • Second area, 2011: 16.6%
  • Second area, 2016: 15.4%
  • Second area, 2021: 6.2%
PT stops in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +8 more in Chelmer - Graceville
25 35th pct 33 43rd pct
Stops/1k in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +1.55 more in Fig Tree Pocket
5.75 70th pct 4.20 48th pct
Departures/1k in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +74.7 more in Chelmer - Graceville
820.5 51st pct 895.1 53rd pct
PT routes in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +45 more in Chelmer - Graceville
9 57th pct 54 87th pct
Stop walk in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +4 longer in Fig Tree Pocket
6 57th pct 2 14th pct
Drive to city in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +2 longer in Fig Tree Pocket
13 20th pct 11 14th pct
Reach 30 min in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +9,538 more in Chelmer - Graceville
13,783 44th pct 23,321 69th pct
Reach 45 min in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +79,302 more in Chelmer - Graceville
13,783 21st pct 93,085 69th pct
Transit to city in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +22 longer in Fig Tree Pocket
64 61st pct 42 21st pct

How people get to work

44.8% Car (driver) ◂ +5.1 pts 39.7%
32.2% Worked at home +0.9 pts ▸ 33.1%
0.8% Train +5.0 pts ▸ 5.8%
2.8% Car (passenger) ◂ +0.4 pts 2.4%
1.7% Bicycle ◂ +0.4 pts 1.3%
0.3% Walked +1.1 pts ▸ 1.3%
1.1% Bus ◂ +0.7 pts 0.4%

Motor vehicles per home

48.5% 2 vehicles ◂ +3.5 pts 45.0%
20.2% 1 vehicle +11.8 pts ▸ 32.0%
19.6% 3 vehicles ◂ +6.3 pts 13.2%
9.5% 4 or more ◂ +3.4 pts 6.1%
1.9% No vehicle +1.6 pts ▸ 3.5%

Migration & Movement

Recent movers in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +2.7 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville gap widening
39.2% 56th pct 41.9% 66th pct
  • First area, 2011: 39.1%
  • First area, 2016: 41.4%
  • First area, 2021: 39.2%
  • Second area, 2011: 39.9%
  • Second area, 2016: 43.1%
  • Second area, 2021: 41.9%
Recent arrivals in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +1.6 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville gap widening
13.0% 61st pct 14.7% 68th pct
  • First area, 2011: 18.6%
  • First area, 2016: 13.6%
  • First area, 2021: 13.0%
  • Second area, 2011: 18.1%
  • Second area, 2016: 17.4%
  • Second area, 2021: 14.7%

Jobs & Industry

Unemployment in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +0.2 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville gap steady
3.8% 27th pct 4.0% 33rd pct
  • First area, 2011: 2.9%
  • First area, 2016: 5.5%
  • First area, 2021: 3.8%
  • Second area, 2011: 3.5%
  • Second area, 2016: 5.1%
  • Second area, 2021: 4.0%
Participation in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +0.3 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket gap steady
68.9% 82nd pct 68.7% 81st pct
  • First area, 2011: 67.1%
  • First area, 2016: 66.0%
  • First area, 2021: 68.9%
  • Second area, 2011: 67.3%
  • Second area, 2016: 68.7%
  • Second area, 2021: 68.7%
Full-time in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +0.1 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville gap narrowing
59.4% 55th pct 59.5% 56th pct
  • First area, 2011: 59.3%
  • First area, 2016: 61.9%
  • First area, 2021: 59.4%
  • Second area, 2011: 61.7%
  • Second area, 2016: 59.8%
  • Second area, 2021: 59.5%

Industries people work in

17.4% Health care & social assistance ◂ +2.8 pts 14.6%
16.7% Professional & technical ◂ +0.1 pts 16.6%
12.4% Education & training +0.1 pts ▸ 12.5%
7.5% Retail trade ◂ +0.3 pts 7.2%
5.0% Public administration & safety +0.9 pts ▸ 5.9%
5.7% Finance & insurance ◂ +0.4 pts 5.3%
5.3% Construction +0.2 pts ▸ 5.5%
4.9% Accommodation & food +0.1 pts ▸ 5.1%
3.2% Manufacturing +0.7 pts ▸ 3.9%
1.9% Transport & warehousing +1.0 pts ▸ 2.9%
2.6% Rental & real estate +0.2 pts ▸ 2.8%
2.8% Mining ◂ +0.4 pts 2.4%

Occupations people work in

41.6% Professionals +1.0 pts ▸ 42.7%
21.6% Managers ◂ +2.5 pts 19.1%
11.0% Clerical & administrative +1.0 pts ▸ 12.0%
7.3% Community & personal service +0.5 pts ▸ 7.7%
7.2% Sales workers ◂ +0.7 pts 6.5%
4.9% Technicians & trades +1.0 pts ▸ 5.9%
3.3% Labourers ◂ +0.1 pts 3.3%
1.3% Machinery operators & drivers +0.2 pts ▸ 1.5%

Economy & Advantage

10 100th pct 10 100th pct
10 100th pct 10 100th pct
10 100th pct 10 100th pct
10 100th pct 10 100th pct
IRSAD score in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +20 higher in Fig Tree Pocket
1,172 100th pct 1,152 98th pct
ERP in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +3,383 higher in Chelmer - Graceville
4,632 18th pct 8,015 37th pct
Growth in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +4.2 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket
5.0% 54th pct 0.9% 17th pct
Businesses in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +282 higher in Chelmer - Graceville
529 27th pct 811 44th pct

Environment & Climate

Rainfall in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +67 higher in Chelmer - Graceville
1,078 67th pct 1,144 71st pct
Max temp in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +0.3 higher in Fig Tree Pocket
27.6 87th pct 27.3 86th pct
Min temp in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +0.7 higher in Chelmer - Graceville
14.6 78th pct 15.3 82nd pct

Walkability

Walk score in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +3.6 higher in Chelmer - Graceville
3.8 28th pct 7.4 79th pct
Types ≤15 min in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +4.5 more in Chelmer - Graceville
3.2 21st pct 7.6 86th pct
15-min city in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +98.8 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville
0.6% 0th pct 99.4% 85th pct
Walk to shops in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +83.5 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville
5.6% 4th pct 89.1% 74th pct
Walk to transit in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +3.0 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville
95.7% 58th pct 98.7% 69th pct
Walk to school in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +14.1 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville
82.6% 59th pct 96.7% 80th pct
Walk to a park in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +0.4 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville
99.6% 60th pct 100.0% 70th pct
Walk to health in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +86.5 pts higher in Chelmer - Graceville
0.4% 1st pct 86.8% 81st pct
Amenities/1k in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +10.7 more in Fig Tree Pocket
23.7 79th pct 13.0 43rd pct
Intersections/km² in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +80 higher in Chelmer - Graceville
70 45th pct 151 61st pct
Mean slope in Fig Tree Pocketin Chelmer - Graceville +4.1 pts higher in Fig Tree Pocket
7.7% 79th pct 3.5% 19th pct

Compare Fig Tree Pocket with nearby areas

Compare Chelmer - Graceville with nearby areas

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Fig Tree Pocket vs Chelmer - Graceville [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/304021089/fig-tree-pocket/vs/304031092/chelmer-graceville