Compare
Fig Tree Pocket vs Sherwood
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 1.9 km apart · Fig Tree Pocket profile · Sherwood profile
Fig Tree Pocket Sherwood
Sherwood and Fig Tree Pocket are neighbouring areas with very different layouts. Sherwood is a walker's paradise where 99.6% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of health services, while Fig Tree Pocket is mostly car-dependent. Fig Tree Pocket is wealthier, with a typical weekly household income of $3,791 compared to $2,073 in Sherwood. This wealth is reflected in the housing; 99.4% of homes in Fig Tree Pocket are separate houses, whereas Sherwood has more variety, with 30.3% of residents living in flats or apartments.
Both areas share similar daily rhythms, with nearly the same unemployment rates and a similar share of adults working or looking for work. They also have an almost identical share of people who have served in the Defence Force. While they share these commonalities, the gap in household income has widened since 2011, and Sherwood has seen a growing number of people living alone compared to Fig Tree Pocket.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,652
- First area, 2016: 4,045
- First area, 2021: 4,345
- Second area, 2011: 5,246
- Second area, 2016: 5,642
- Second area, 2021: 6,452
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.5% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Sherwood: 0.4% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.9% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Sherwood: 0.9% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Fig Tree Pocket: 0.9% males, 1.4% females; 75–79 in Sherwood: 1.4% males, 1.8% females
- 70–74 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.9% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in Sherwood: 1.9% males, 2.6% females
- 65–69 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.0% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Sherwood: 2.2% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 60–64 in Sherwood: 2.1% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Fig Tree Pocket: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Sherwood: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 50–54 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.6% males, 4.1% females; 50–54 in Sherwood: 3.2% males, 3.7% females
- 45–49 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.1% males, 4.9% females; 45–49 in Sherwood: 3.4% males, 4.1% females
- 40–44 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.0% males, 4.7% females; 40–44 in Sherwood: 3.1% males, 3.8% females
- 35–39 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.4% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Sherwood: 3.6% males, 3.8% females
- 30–34 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.3% males, 1.6% females; 30–34 in Sherwood: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 25–29 in Fig Tree Pocket: 1.4% males, 1.2% females; 25–29 in Sherwood: 3.0% males, 4.1% females
- 20–24 in Fig Tree Pocket: 3.3% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Sherwood: 3.0% males, 3.4% females
- 15–19 in Fig Tree Pocket: 5.0% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in Sherwood: 3.0% males, 3.8% females
- 10–14 in Fig Tree Pocket: 5.4% males, 4.7% females; 10–14 in Sherwood: 3.2% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Fig Tree Pocket: 4.2% males, 3.9% females; 5–9 in Sherwood: 2.8% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Fig Tree Pocket: 2.7% males, 1.9% females; 0–4 in Sherwood: 2.5% males, 2.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $863
- First area, 2016: $1,005
- First area, 2021: $1,205
- Second area, 2011: $808
- Second area, 2016: $917
- Second area, 2021: $1,059
- First area, 2011: $2,706
- First area, 2016: $3,038
- First area, 2021: $3,791
- Second area, 2011: $1,740
- Second area, 2016: $1,937
- Second area, 2021: $2,073
- First area, 2011: $2,798
- First area, 2016: $3,313
- First area, 2021: $4,226
- Second area, 2011: $2,364
- Second area, 2016: $2,533
- Second area, 2021: $2,923
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.2
- First area, 2016: 3.1
- First area, 2021: 3.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $475
- First area, 2016: $540
- First area, 2021: $590
- Second area, 2011: $340
- Second area, 2016: $385
- Second area, 2021: $395
- First area, 2011: $2,600
- First area, 2016: $2,815
- First area, 2021: $3,033
- Second area, 2011: $2,200
- Second area, 2016: $2,253
- Second area, 2021: $2,210
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Fig Tree Pocket with nearby areas
Compare Sherwood with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Fig Tree Pocket vs Sherwood [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/304021089/fig-tree-pocket/vs/304031095/sherwood