Compare
Camp Hill vs Norman Park
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 2.3 km apart · Camp Hill profile · Norman Park profile
Camp Hill Norman Park
Camp Hill and Norman Park are neighbouring areas in Brisbane with very similar typical incomes and resident ages. Camp Hill is more focused on family housing, with separate houses being far higher at 80.9% compared to 69.5% in Norman Park. It is also more walkable for essentials, as 99.6% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries and 99.7% are near health services, while Norman Park figures are much lower at 70.9% and 74.2%. Camp Hill also has a larger education presence, with three schools and an average school size of 641, which is far higher than the 364 average in Norman Park.
These two areas share a great deal in common, including an identical typical resident age of 35 and nearly the same typical weekly household incomes. While they track closely on many measures, some gaps are shifting; for example, the difference in the share of households that rent has narrowed since 2011. Meanwhile, the gap in people reporting no religion has widened, with the figure now well higher in Norman Park at 45.7% compared to 39.7% in Camp Hill.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 10,534
- First area, 2016: 11,177
- First area, 2021: 12,145
- Second area, 2011: 6,003
- Second area, 2016: 6,298
- Second area, 2021: 6,857
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 35 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Camp Hill: 0.4% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Norman Park: 0.3% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Camp Hill: 0.4% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Norman Park: 0.3% males, 0.4% females
- 75–79 in Camp Hill: 0.7% males, 0.8% females; 75–79 in Norman Park: 0.7% males, 0.7% females
- 70–74 in Camp Hill: 1.3% males, 1.2% females; 70–74 in Norman Park: 1.6% males, 1.5% females
- 65–69 in Camp Hill: 1.2% males, 1.6% females; 65–69 in Norman Park: 1.6% males, 1.7% females
- 60–64 in Camp Hill: 2.1% males, 2.1% females; 60–64 in Norman Park: 2.0% males, 2.2% females
- 55–59 in Camp Hill: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 55–59 in Norman Park: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 50–54 in Camp Hill: 3.7% males, 4.0% females; 50–54 in Norman Park: 3.4% males, 3.9% females
- 45–49 in Camp Hill: 4.2% males, 4.4% females; 45–49 in Norman Park: 3.9% males, 3.9% females
- 40–44 in Camp Hill: 3.8% males, 4.1% females; 40–44 in Norman Park: 4.0% males, 3.9% females
- 35–39 in Camp Hill: 4.2% males, 4.6% females; 35–39 in Norman Park: 3.8% males, 4.6% females
- 30–34 in Camp Hill: 3.3% males, 3.9% females; 30–34 in Norman Park: 4.4% males, 4.2% females
- 25–29 in Camp Hill: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 25–29 in Norman Park: 3.8% males, 4.2% females
- 20–24 in Camp Hill: 3.2% males, 3.7% females; 20–24 in Norman Park: 3.5% males, 3.8% females
- 15–19 in Camp Hill: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Norman Park: 3.2% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Camp Hill: 4.0% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Norman Park: 3.5% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Camp Hill: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 5–9 in Norman Park: 3.2% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Camp Hill: 3.8% males, 3.4% females; 0–4 in Norman Park: 3.3% males, 3.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $856
- First area, 2016: $1,004
- First area, 2021: $1,298
- Second area, 2011: $974
- Second area, 2016: $1,117
- Second area, 2021: $1,319
- First area, 2011: $1,925
- First area, 2016: $2,248
- First area, 2021: $3,010
- Second area, 2011: $2,113
- Second area, 2016: $2,386
- Second area, 2021: $2,918
- First area, 2011: $2,307
- First area, 2016: $2,743
- First area, 2021: $3,498
- Second area, 2011: $2,516
- Second area, 2016: $2,959
- Second area, 2021: $3,478
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $360
- First area, 2016: $410
- First area, 2021: $460
- Second area, 2011: $385
- Second area, 2016: $430
- Second area, 2021: $450
- First area, 2011: $2,400
- First area, 2016: $2,258
- First area, 2021: $2,600
- Second area, 2011: $2,383
- Second area, 2016: $2,600
- Second area, 2021: $2,600
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Camp Hill with nearby areas
Compare Norman Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Camp Hill vs Norman Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/303011047/camp-hill/vs/305021118/norman-park