Compare
White Hills - Ascot vs Rochester
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 52 km apart · White Hills - Ascot profile · Rochester profile
White Hills - Ascot Rochester
White Hills - Ascot and Rochester are two Victorian areas with very different profiles. White Hills - Ascot is a growing hub for families, with a typical resident aged 34 and a high share of children under 15 (23.6%). In contrast, Rochester is far older; its typical resident is 50, and seniors aged 65 and over make up 28.6% of the population. White Hills - Ascot also sees more movement, with 44.6% of residents moving in the last five years, while 65.2% of adults are working or looking for work. Rochester is more settled, with 48.6% of homes owned outright.
Since 2011, these two areas have moved further apart in almost every key way. The age gap has widened, as has the difference in school completion and the share of people caring for children. While they share some common ground — such as similar rates of mental health conditions and nearly identical proportions of First Nations people — the distance between them continues to grow. This is most clear in their recent growth, with White Hills - Ascot increasing by 11.4% while Rochester fell by 7.4%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 8,736
- First area, 2016: 11,747
- First area, 2021: 14,446
- Second area, 2011: 3,798
- Second area, 2016: 3,880
- Second area, 2021: 4,016
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 33 yrs
- First area, 2021: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 50 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in White Hills - Ascot: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 85+ in Rochester: 1.6% males, 2.5% females
- 80–84 in White Hills - Ascot: 0.7% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Rochester: 2.2% males, 2.0% females
- 75–79 in White Hills - Ascot: 1.2% males, 1.4% females; 75–79 in Rochester: 2.6% males, 3.1% females
- 70–74 in White Hills - Ascot: 1.7% males, 1.9% females; 70–74 in Rochester: 3.6% males, 3.0% females
- 65–69 in White Hills - Ascot: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 65–69 in Rochester: 3.8% males, 4.1% females
- 60–64 in White Hills - Ascot: 2.3% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Rochester: 4.2% males, 3.9% females
- 55–59 in White Hills - Ascot: 2.6% males, 2.9% females; 55–59 in Rochester: 3.9% males, 4.0% females
- 50–54 in White Hills - Ascot: 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 50–54 in Rochester: 3.0% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in White Hills - Ascot: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Rochester: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in White Hills - Ascot: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Rochester: 2.2% males, 2.2% females
- 35–39 in White Hills - Ascot: 3.6% males, 4.2% females; 35–39 in Rochester: 2.1% males, 2.5% females
- 30–34 in White Hills - Ascot: 3.8% males, 4.2% females; 30–34 in Rochester: 1.9% males, 1.8% females
- 25–29 in White Hills - Ascot: 3.5% males, 4.2% females; 25–29 in Rochester: 2.1% males, 2.2% females
- 20–24 in White Hills - Ascot: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 20–24 in Rochester: 2.4% males, 2.3% females
- 15–19 in White Hills - Ascot: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Rochester: 2.6% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in White Hills - Ascot: 3.4% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Rochester: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 5–9 in White Hills - Ascot: 4.2% males, 4.3% females; 5–9 in Rochester: 2.4% males, 3.3% females
- 0–4 in White Hills - Ascot: 4.2% males, 4.0% females; 0–4 in Rochester: 2.2% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $567
- First area, 2016: $677
- First area, 2021: $811
- Second area, 2011: $466
- Second area, 2016: $527
- Second area, 2021: $606
- First area, 2011: $1,182
- First area, 2016: $1,393
- First area, 2021: $1,689
- Second area, 2011: $901
- Second area, 2016: $1,002
- Second area, 2021: $1,166
- First area, 2011: $1,362
- First area, 2016: $1,551
- First area, 2021: $1,941
- Second area, 2011: $1,158
- Second area, 2016: $1,299
- Second area, 2021: $1,532
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $240
- First area, 2016: $290
- First area, 2021: $330
- Second area, 2011: $140
- Second area, 2016: $170
- Second area, 2021: $213
- First area, 2011: $1,500
- First area, 2016: $1,517
- First area, 2021: $1,469
- Second area, 2011: $1,109
- Second area, 2016: $1,192
- Second area, 2021: $1,122
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare White Hills - Ascot with nearby areas
Compare Rochester with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). White Hills - Ascot vs Rochester [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/202011025/white-hills-ascot/vs/216011409/rochester