Compare
Royal National Park vs Sutherland - Kirrawee
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 10 km apart · Royal National Park profile · Sutherland - Kirrawee profile
Royal National Park Sutherland - Kirrawee
Royal National Park is sparsely populated, while Sutherland - Kirrawee is a much larger residential hub. The two areas differ sharply in age and diversity; Royal National Park is far younger, with a typical resident aged 22 and 31.0% of people being children. In contrast, Sutherland - Kirrawee is far older, with a typical age of 38 and 17.4% of people aged 65 and over. Diversity is also much higher in Sutherland - Kirrawee, where 23.5% of people were born overseas and 17.5% use another language at home, compared to 9.5% and 0.0% in Royal National Park.
Across the two areas, the gap in the typical age of residents has widened since 2011, growing from 10 to 16 years. Despite these different demographics, both areas share similar typical weekly household incomes and a similar level of education and job skills. They are also separated by their accessibility; Sutherland - Kirrawee is a walker's paradise, while Royal National Park is car-dependent, with a much longer drive time to the city.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 16
- First area, 2016: 27
- First area, 2021: 42
- Second area, 2011: 19,370
- Second area, 2016: 20,868
- Second area, 2021: 23,238
- First area, 2011: 27 yrs
- First area, 2016: 28 yrs
- First area, 2021: 22 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Sutherland - Kirrawee: 1.3% males, 2.1% females
- 80–84 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Sutherland - Kirrawee: 1.1% males, 1.5% females
- 75–79 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Sutherland - Kirrawee: 1.4% males, 2.1% females
- 70–74 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Sutherland - Kirrawee: 1.7% males, 2.2% females
- 65–69 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Sutherland - Kirrawee: 1.9% males, 2.2% females
- 60–64 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 60–64 in Sutherland - Kirrawee: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 55–59 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 55–59 in Sutherland - Kirrawee: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 50–54 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 50–54 in Sutherland - Kirrawee: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 45–49 in Royal National Park: 10.5% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in Sutherland - Kirrawee: 3.1% males, 3.6% females
- 40–44 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 7.9% females; 40–44 in Sutherland - Kirrawee: 3.5% males, 3.6% females
- 35–39 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 13.2% females; 35–39 in Sutherland - Kirrawee: 4.0% males, 4.3% females
- 30–34 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Sutherland - Kirrawee: 4.3% males, 4.7% females
- 25–29 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 15.8% females; 25–29 in Sutherland - Kirrawee: 3.9% males, 3.9% females
- 20–24 in Royal National Park: 7.9% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Sutherland - Kirrawee: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Royal National Park: 0.0% males, 10.5% females; 15–19 in Sutherland - Kirrawee: 2.5% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Royal National Park: 10.5% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Sutherland - Kirrawee: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 5–9 in Royal National Park: 7.9% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Sutherland - Kirrawee: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Royal National Park: 15.8% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Sutherland - Kirrawee: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $483
- First area, 2016: $833
- First area, 2021: $825
- Second area, 2011: $723
- Second area, 2016: $838
- Second area, 2021: $1,056
- First area, 2011: $100
- First area, 2016: $1,875
- First area, 2021: $1,875
- Second area, 2011: $1,393
- Second area, 2016: $1,692
- Second area, 2021: $2,010
- First area, 2021: $1,625
- Second area, 2011: $1,787
- Second area, 2016: $2,114
- Second area, 2021: $2,514
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 1.0
- First area, 2021: 3.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $378
- First area, 2021: $390
- Second area, 2011: $357
- Second area, 2016: $420
- Second area, 2021: $460
- Second area, 2011: $2,200
- Second area, 2016: $2,173
- Second area, 2021: $2,383
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 1.10
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Royal National Park with nearby areas
Compare Sutherland - Kirrawee with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Royal National Park vs Sutherland - Kirrawee [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/128021537/royal-national-park/vs/128021538/sutherland-kirrawee