Compare
Cambridge Park vs Glenmore Park - Regentville
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 6.7 km apart · Cambridge Park profile · Glenmore Park - Regentville profile
Cambridge Park Glenmore Park - Regentville
Glenmore Park - Regentville and Cambridge Park are neighbouring areas with distinct economic and educational profiles. Glenmore Park - Regentville is far more affluent, with a typical household income of $2,425 per week compared to $1,806 in Cambridge Park. This advantage is reflected in the workforce; 34.7% of households in Glenmore Park - Regentville earn $3,000 or more weekly, which is far higher than the 18.9% in Cambridge Park. Education levels also differ significantly, with Year 12 completion far higher in Glenmore Park - Regentville at 57.3%, while Cambridge Park sits at 42.6%.
Both areas share a very similar age profile, with the typical resident in each being 35 years old. While they are alike in this regard, other gaps have grown since 2011, particularly in income and the share of adults working or looking for work. Despite these economic differences, Cambridge Park is more walkable, with 90.5% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries compared to 47.1% in Glenmore Park - Regentville.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 15,135
- First area, 2016: 15,641
- First area, 2021: 16,004
- Second area, 2011: 20,889
- Second area, 2016: 21,202
- Second area, 2021: 21,002
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 35 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cambridge Park: 0.3% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Glenmore Park - Regentville: 0.2% males, 0.4% females
- 80–84 in Cambridge Park: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Glenmore Park - Regentville: 0.4% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Cambridge Park: 1.3% males, 1.2% females; 75–79 in Glenmore Park - Regentville: 0.7% males, 0.9% females
- 70–74 in Cambridge Park: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 70–74 in Glenmore Park - Regentville: 1.4% males, 1.5% females
- 65–69 in Cambridge Park: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 65–69 in Glenmore Park - Regentville: 1.9% males, 2.1% females
- 60–64 in Cambridge Park: 2.7% males, 3.3% females; 60–64 in Glenmore Park - Regentville: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Cambridge Park: 2.4% males, 2.8% females; 55–59 in Glenmore Park - Regentville: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Cambridge Park: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 50–54 in Glenmore Park - Regentville: 3.4% males, 3.8% females
- 45–49 in Cambridge Park: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Glenmore Park - Regentville: 3.6% males, 4.2% females
- 40–44 in Cambridge Park: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Glenmore Park - Regentville: 3.3% males, 3.9% females
- 35–39 in Cambridge Park: 3.8% males, 3.8% females; 35–39 in Glenmore Park - Regentville: 3.3% males, 3.8% females
- 30–34 in Cambridge Park: 3.7% males, 3.9% females; 30–34 in Glenmore Park - Regentville: 3.0% males, 3.5% females
- 25–29 in Cambridge Park: 3.5% males, 4.0% females; 25–29 in Glenmore Park - Regentville: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 20–24 in Cambridge Park: 3.3% males, 3.0% females; 20–24 in Glenmore Park - Regentville: 3.8% males, 3.3% females
- 15–19 in Cambridge Park: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in Glenmore Park - Regentville: 3.8% males, 4.1% females
- 10–14 in Cambridge Park: 3.5% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Glenmore Park - Regentville: 4.1% males, 4.1% females
- 5–9 in Cambridge Park: 3.9% males, 3.4% females; 5–9 in Glenmore Park - Regentville: 3.8% males, 3.6% females
- 0–4 in Cambridge Park: 3.7% males, 3.6% females; 0–4 in Glenmore Park - Regentville: 3.5% males, 3.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $639
- First area, 2016: $726
- First area, 2021: $820
- Second area, 2011: $780
- Second area, 2016: $855
- Second area, 2021: $1,009
- First area, 2011: $1,464
- First area, 2016: $1,637
- First area, 2021: $1,806
- Second area, 2011: $1,920
- Second area, 2016: $2,155
- Second area, 2021: $2,425
- First area, 2011: $1,581
- First area, 2016: $1,769
- First area, 2021: $2,016
- Second area, 2011: $2,005
- Second area, 2016: $2,244
- Second area, 2021: $2,588
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.9
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 3.2
- Second area, 2016: 3.2
- Second area, 2021: 3.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $310
- First area, 2016: $380
- First area, 2021: $400
- Second area, 2011: $360
- Second area, 2016: $430
- Second area, 2021: $465
- First area, 2011: $1,880
- First area, 2016: $1,845
- First area, 2021: $2,058
- Second area, 2011: $2,200
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Cambridge Park with nearby areas
Compare Glenmore Park - Regentville with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cambridge Park vs Glenmore Park - Regentville [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/124031457/cambridge-park/vs/124031460/glenmore-park-regentville