Compare
Asquith - Mount Colah vs Turramurra
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 4.2 km apart · Asquith - Mount Colah profile · Turramurra profile
Asquith - Mount Colah Turramurra
Asquith - Mount Colah and Turramurra are neighbouring areas in New South Wales that differ mainly in age and wealth. Turramurra is noticeably older, with the typical resident aged 45 compared to 39 in Asquith - Mount Colah, and it has a much larger share of people aged 65 and over (23.7% versus 13.6%). Wealth is also higher in Turramurra, where typical weekly family income is $3,460, well higher than the $2,766 seen in Asquith - Mount Colah. Turramurra also has a far higher share of people with a bachelor degree or higher (50.7% compared to 40.5%) and more people working from home.
Both areas are very similar in other ways, such as the share of people born overseas, which is around 36% for both. This shared international profile exists alongside a widening gap in housing and income, with more homes owned outright in Turramurra since 2011. While Asquith - Mount Colah has a far larger First Nations population and more schools per child, the two areas remain alike in their typical personal incomes and the proportion of residents who speak little or no English.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 17,734
- First area, 2016: 18,287
- First area, 2021: 22,057
- Second area, 2011: 18,028
- Second area, 2016: 19,268
- Second area, 2021: 20,251
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Asquith - Mount Colah: 0.5% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Turramurra: 2.1% males, 3.3% females
- 80–84 in Asquith - Mount Colah: 0.8% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Turramurra: 1.6% males, 2.3% females
- 75–79 in Asquith - Mount Colah: 1.3% males, 1.3% females; 75–79 in Turramurra: 2.0% males, 2.7% females
- 70–74 in Asquith - Mount Colah: 1.8% males, 2.0% females; 70–74 in Turramurra: 2.2% males, 2.7% females
- 65–69 in Asquith - Mount Colah: 2.2% males, 2.3% females; 65–69 in Turramurra: 2.2% males, 2.6% females
- 60–64 in Asquith - Mount Colah: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Turramurra: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Asquith - Mount Colah: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Turramurra: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Asquith - Mount Colah: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Turramurra: 3.5% males, 3.9% females
- 45–49 in Asquith - Mount Colah: 4.0% males, 4.0% females; 45–49 in Turramurra: 3.5% males, 3.8% females
- 40–44 in Asquith - Mount Colah: 3.9% males, 4.3% females; 40–44 in Turramurra: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Asquith - Mount Colah: 3.7% males, 4.0% females; 35–39 in Turramurra: 2.5% males, 3.1% females
- 30–34 in Asquith - Mount Colah: 2.8% males, 3.4% females; 30–34 in Turramurra: 1.6% males, 1.8% females
- 25–29 in Asquith - Mount Colah: 2.2% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Turramurra: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
- 20–24 in Asquith - Mount Colah: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Turramurra: 2.7% males, 2.4% females
- 15–19 in Asquith - Mount Colah: 3.3% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in Turramurra: 3.8% males, 3.3% females
- 10–14 in Asquith - Mount Colah: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Turramurra: 3.9% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Asquith - Mount Colah: 3.8% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Turramurra: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 0–4 in Asquith - Mount Colah: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 0–4 in Turramurra: 2.3% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $694
- First area, 2016: $812
- First area, 2021: $1,012
- Second area, 2011: $763
- Second area, 2016: $910
- Second area, 2021: $1,074
- First area, 2011: $1,911
- First area, 2016: $2,188
- First area, 2021: $2,450
- Second area, 2011: $2,124
- Second area, 2016: $2,459
- Second area, 2021: $2,917
- First area, 2011: $2,120
- First area, 2016: $2,346
- First area, 2021: $2,766
- Second area, 2011: $2,575
- Second area, 2016: $2,977
- Second area, 2021: $3,460
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 3.0
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $450
- First area, 2016: $540
- First area, 2021: $500
- Second area, 2011: $526
- Second area, 2016: $600
- Second area, 2021: $610
- First area, 2011: $2,383
- First area, 2016: $2,400
- First area, 2021: $2,550
- Second area, 2011: $3,000
- Second area, 2016: $3,000
- Second area, 2021: $3,500
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Asquith - Mount Colah with nearby areas
Compare Turramurra with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Asquith - Mount Colah vs Turramurra [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/121021403/asquith-mount-colah/vs/121031411/turramurra