Compare
Port Botany Industrial vs Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 6.5 km apart · Port Botany Industrial profile · Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena profile
Port Botany Industrial Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena
Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena is a large residential area, while Port Botany Industrial is sparsely populated and largely non-residential. There are stark differences in their typical incomes and ages; the typical resident in Port Botany Industrial is far older at 61 compared to 42 in Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena. Income is also far higher in Port Botany Industrial, where the typical weekly personal income is $1,812, compared to $1,124 in Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena.
The gap in typical age has widened since 2016, growing from 6 years to 19 years. Despite this, the two areas share similar weather and housing density, with the same typical number of people per bedroom. While Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena is a walker's paradise and Port Botany Industrial is somewhat walkable, both have over 90% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3
- First area, 2016: 10
- First area, 2021: 6
- Second area, 2016: 23,491
- Second area, 2021: 24,374
- First area, 2011: 46 yrs
- First area, 2016: 46 yrs
- First area, 2021: 61 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Port Botany Industrial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena: 1.0% males, 1.7% females
- 80–84 in Port Botany Industrial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena: 1.0% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Port Botany Industrial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 70–74 in Port Botany Industrial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Port Botany Industrial: 50.0% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 60–64 in Port Botany Industrial: 0.0% males, 50.0% females; 60–64 in Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena: 3.8% males, 3.7% females
- 55–59 in Port Botany Industrial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 55–59 in Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena: 3.5% males, 3.6% females
- 50–54 in Port Botany Industrial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 50–54 in Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Port Botany Industrial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena: 3.2% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Port Botany Industrial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Port Botany Industrial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 30–34 in Port Botany Industrial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena: 3.8% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Port Botany Industrial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena: 3.8% males, 3.9% females
- 20–24 in Port Botany Industrial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena: 2.6% males, 2.9% females
- 15–19 in Port Botany Industrial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena: 2.5% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Port Botany Industrial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena: 2.5% males, 2.3% females
- 5–9 in Port Botany Industrial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena: 2.5% males, 2.3% females
- 0–4 in Port Botany Industrial: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena: 2.5% males, 2.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $700
- First area, 2016: $900
- First area, 2021: $1,812
- Second area, 2016: $962
- Second area, 2021: $1,124
- First area, 2021: $2,499
- Second area, 2016: $1,822
- Second area, 2021: $2,105
- First area, 2021: $3,749
- Second area, 2016: $2,293
- Second area, 2021: $2,682
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2021: 1.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2021: $1,200
- Second area, 2016: $450
- Second area, 2021: $500
- First area, 2021: $3,179
- Second area, 2016: $2,260
- Second area, 2021: $2,600
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Port Botany Industrial with nearby areas
Compare Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Port Botany Industrial vs Cronulla - Kurnell - Bundeena [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/117011324/port-botany-industrial/vs/128011604/cronulla-kurnell-bundeena