Compare
Bilpin - Colo - St Albans vs Richmond - Clarendon
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 36 km apart · Bilpin - Colo - St Albans profile · Richmond - Clarendon profile
Bilpin - Colo - St Albans Richmond - Clarendon
Bilpin - Colo - St Albans and Richmond - Clarendon are two different kinds of rural and regional living. Bilpin - Colo - St Albans is a more isolated, older area where the typical resident is 48, and 41.1% of homes are owned outright. In contrast, Richmond - Clarendon is more dynamic and populated, with a typical age of 39 and a much higher rental rate of 34.4%. While Bilpin - Colo - St Albans is car-dependent with very few amenities within a 15-minute walk, Richmond - Clarendon is somewhat walkable, with 62.8% of homes located in a 15-minute-city walkshed.
Both areas sit near the national average for overall advantage. They also share very similar typical weekly household incomes, around $1,600, and almost identical numbers of people per bedroom. However, the gap between them is widening in some areas; for example, the difference in the share of people who volunteer has grown to 10 percentage points, and the age gap has increased since 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,639
- First area, 2016: 2,692
- First area, 2021: 2,846
- Second area, 2011: 13,440
- Second area, 2016: 13,842
- Second area, 2021: 15,239
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bilpin - Colo - St Albans: 1.1% males, 0.2% females; 85+ in Richmond - Clarendon: 1.2% males, 2.7% females
- 80–84 in Bilpin - Colo - St Albans: 1.3% males, 0.9% females; 80–84 in Richmond - Clarendon: 1.4% males, 2.1% females
- 75–79 in Bilpin - Colo - St Albans: 2.7% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Richmond - Clarendon: 1.9% males, 2.5% females
- 70–74 in Bilpin - Colo - St Albans: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 70–74 in Richmond - Clarendon: 2.2% males, 3.1% females
- 65–69 in Bilpin - Colo - St Albans: 3.5% males, 2.4% females; 65–69 in Richmond - Clarendon: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
- 60–64 in Bilpin - Colo - St Albans: 4.7% males, 3.7% females; 60–64 in Richmond - Clarendon: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Bilpin - Colo - St Albans: 4.8% males, 5.3% females; 55–59 in Richmond - Clarendon: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 50–54 in Bilpin - Colo - St Albans: 4.6% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Richmond - Clarendon: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Bilpin - Colo - St Albans: 4.4% males, 4.5% females; 45–49 in Richmond - Clarendon: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Bilpin - Colo - St Albans: 2.4% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Richmond - Clarendon: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Bilpin - Colo - St Albans: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 35–39 in Richmond - Clarendon: 2.9% males, 3.2% females
- 30–34 in Bilpin - Colo - St Albans: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 30–34 in Richmond - Clarendon: 3.9% males, 3.6% females
- 25–29 in Bilpin - Colo - St Albans: 2.0% males, 1.7% females; 25–29 in Richmond - Clarendon: 3.9% males, 4.1% females
- 20–24 in Bilpin - Colo - St Albans: 2.3% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Richmond - Clarendon: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 15–19 in Bilpin - Colo - St Albans: 3.1% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Richmond - Clarendon: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Bilpin - Colo - St Albans: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Richmond - Clarendon: 2.9% males, 2.6% females
- 5–9 in Bilpin - Colo - St Albans: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 5–9 in Richmond - Clarendon: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Bilpin - Colo - St Albans: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 0–4 in Richmond - Clarendon: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $531
- First area, 2016: $640
- First area, 2021: $746
- Second area, 2011: $591
- Second area, 2016: $658
- Second area, 2021: $790
- First area, 2011: $1,098
- First area, 2016: $1,343
- First area, 2021: $1,688
- Second area, 2011: $1,152
- Second area, 2016: $1,317
- Second area, 2021: $1,587
- First area, 2011: $1,312
- First area, 2016: $1,696
- First area, 2021: $2,122
- Second area, 2011: $1,406
- Second area, 2016: $1,638
- Second area, 2021: $2,023
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $150
- First area, 2016: $185
- First area, 2021: $320
- Second area, 2011: $290
- Second area, 2016: $360
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $1,975
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $1,950
- Second area, 2016: $1,900
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Bilpin - Colo - St Albans with nearby areas
Compare Richmond - Clarendon with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bilpin - Colo - St Albans vs Richmond - Clarendon [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/115031299/bilpin-colo-st-albans/vs/124041466/richmond-clarendon