Compare
Deniliquin vs Echuca
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 74 km apart · Deniliquin profile · Echuca profile
Deniliquin Echuca
Echuca and Deniliquin are regional centres separated by 74km and a state border. Echuca is the larger of the two, with far more businesses and a more developed transport network, including far more public transport stops and routes. It is also more walkable, with 73.6% of homes within a 15 minute walk of groceries compared to 60.6% in Deniliquin. In contrast, Deniliquin has a higher share of volunteers (19.3% versus 14.3%) and a higher proportion of people living alone, at 34.9% compared to 29.9% in Echuca.
Both areas share very similar everyday realities, with nearly identical typical weekly personal incomes and similar proportions of children under 15. They also both have far fewer people who speak little or no English than the national figure. While they track closely in many ways, some gaps are shifting; for example, the difference in Year 12 completion has widened since 2011, and typical monthly home-loan payments are now $400 higher in Echuca than in Deniliquin.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 7,120
- First area, 2016: 7,434
- First area, 2021: 7,038
- Second area, 2011: 14,191
- Second area, 2016: 14,574
- Second area, 2021: 15,636
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Deniliquin: 1.5% males, 2.6% females; 85+ in Echuca: 1.3% males, 2.2% females
- 80–84 in Deniliquin: 1.7% males, 2.3% females; 80–84 in Echuca: 1.6% males, 1.8% females
- 75–79 in Deniliquin: 2.0% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Echuca: 2.2% males, 2.5% females
- 70–74 in Deniliquin: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 70–74 in Echuca: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 65–69 in Deniliquin: 3.9% males, 3.4% females; 65–69 in Echuca: 3.1% males, 3.6% females
- 60–64 in Deniliquin: 4.0% males, 4.0% females; 60–64 in Echuca: 3.6% males, 3.8% females
- 55–59 in Deniliquin: 3.1% males, 3.9% females; 55–59 in Echuca: 2.9% males, 3.6% females
- 50–54 in Deniliquin: 2.8% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Echuca: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Deniliquin: 2.8% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Echuca: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Deniliquin: 2.1% males, 2.5% females; 40–44 in Echuca: 2.3% males, 2.8% females
- 35–39 in Deniliquin: 2.3% males, 2.5% females; 35–39 in Echuca: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Deniliquin: 2.1% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Echuca: 2.5% males, 2.9% females
- 25–29 in Deniliquin: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 25–29 in Echuca: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 20–24 in Deniliquin: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 20–24 in Echuca: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Deniliquin: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Echuca: 3.1% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Deniliquin: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 10–14 in Echuca: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Deniliquin: 2.9% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Echuca: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Deniliquin: 2.7% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Echuca: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $479
- First area, 2016: $583
- First area, 2021: $688
- Second area, 2011: $509
- Second area, 2016: $606
- Second area, 2021: $713
- First area, 2011: $856
- First area, 2016: $1,048
- First area, 2021: $1,199
- Second area, 2011: $932
- Second area, 2016: $1,144
- Second area, 2021: $1,347
- First area, 2011: $1,165
- First area, 2016: $1,385
- First area, 2021: $1,680
- Second area, 2011: $1,159
- Second area, 2016: $1,433
- Second area, 2021: $1,741
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $150
- First area, 2016: $195
- First area, 2021: $230
- Second area, 2011: $200
- Second area, 2016: $250
- Second area, 2021: $285
- First area, 2011: $1,083
- First area, 2016: $1,083
- First area, 2021: $1,083
- Second area, 2011: $1,473
- Second area, 2016: $1,387
- Second area, 2021: $1,483
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Deniliquin with nearby areas
Compare Echuca with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Deniliquin vs Echuca [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/109031182/deniliquin/vs/216011406/echuca