Compare
Ceduna vs Tumby Bay
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 308 km apart · Ceduna profile · Tumby Bay profile
Ceduna Tumby Bay
Ceduna and Tumby Bay are two South Australian regional areas with very different social profiles. Ceduna has a much larger First Nations population at 24.8%, compared to 2.2% in Tumby Bay, and 20.9% of its residents speak a First Nations language. In contrast, Tumby Bay is far older, with a typical resident aged 52 and 30.8% of the population aged 65 and over, while Ceduna's typical resident is 40. These differences extend to housing; 51.4% of Tumby Bay homes are owned outright, whereas 37.3% of Ceduna households are renting.
Since 2011, the two areas have diverged further in some ways and converged in others. The age gap has widened, and the difference in home ownership has grown, but the gap in First Nations population shares has narrowed. They remain very similar in other aspects, such as the number of people who have moved recently and the typical weekly rent of around $200 to $210. Both areas also sit near the national figure for overall advantage.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,480
- First area, 2016: 3,408
- First area, 2021: 3,505
- Second area, 2011: 2,586
- Second area, 2016: 2,610
- Second area, 2021: 2,817
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 50 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 52 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Ceduna: 0.5% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Tumby Bay: 1.3% males, 2.5% females
- 80–84 in Ceduna: 1.0% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Tumby Bay: 2.1% males, 2.0% females
- 75–79 in Ceduna: 1.9% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in Tumby Bay: 2.8% males, 3.5% females
- 70–74 in Ceduna: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 70–74 in Tumby Bay: 4.2% males, 3.4% females
- 65–69 in Ceduna: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 65–69 in Tumby Bay: 4.4% males, 4.5% females
- 60–64 in Ceduna: 3.3% males, 3.7% females; 60–64 in Tumby Bay: 4.0% males, 4.4% females
- 55–59 in Ceduna: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Tumby Bay: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Ceduna: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Tumby Bay: 3.7% males, 3.0% females
- 45–49 in Ceduna: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Tumby Bay: 2.0% males, 2.8% females
- 40–44 in Ceduna: 2.3% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Tumby Bay: 2.8% males, 2.2% females
- 35–39 in Ceduna: 2.5% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Tumby Bay: 2.0% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Ceduna: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 30–34 in Tumby Bay: 2.0% males, 2.6% females
- 25–29 in Ceduna: 3.7% males, 3.1% females; 25–29 in Tumby Bay: 2.1% males, 1.9% females
- 20–24 in Ceduna: 2.8% males, 2.3% females; 20–24 in Tumby Bay: 1.4% males, 1.2% females
- 15–19 in Ceduna: 2.9% males, 2.1% females; 15–19 in Tumby Bay: 1.7% males, 2.1% females
- 10–14 in Ceduna: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Tumby Bay: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 5–9 in Ceduna: 3.9% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Tumby Bay: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Ceduna: 2.9% males, 3.7% females; 0–4 in Tumby Bay: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $585
- First area, 2016: $696
- First area, 2021: $764
- Second area, 2011: $457
- Second area, 2016: $570
- Second area, 2021: $657
- First area, 2011: $1,048
- First area, 2016: $1,254
- First area, 2021: $1,381
- Second area, 2011: $787
- Second area, 2016: $966
- Second area, 2021: $1,139
- First area, 2011: $1,327
- First area, 2016: $1,503
- First area, 2021: $1,794
- Second area, 2011: $1,012
- Second area, 2016: $1,296
- Second area, 2021: $1,554
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $136
- First area, 2016: $186
- First area, 2021: $200
- Second area, 2011: $150
- Second area, 2016: $170
- Second area, 2021: $210
- First area, 2011: $1,192
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,247
- Second area, 2011: $1,200
- Second area, 2016: $1,170
- Second area, 2021: $1,138
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Ceduna with nearby areas
Compare Tumby Bay with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Ceduna vs Tumby Bay [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA41010/ceduna/vs/LGA47910/tumby-bay