Compare
Burke vs Kowanyama
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 426 km apart · Burke profile · Kowanyama profile
Burke Kowanyama
Kowanyama and Burke are both sparsely populated areas of Queensland, but they differ sharply in their demographics and wealth. Kowanyama has a much higher proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people at 86.8%, compared with 32.5% in Burke. Kowanyama also has a much younger population, with 25.9% of people under 15, while Burke is much lower at 14.8%. There is a significant gap in typical weekly family income, which is $2,125 in Burke but only $858 in Kowanyama.
Both areas are effectively alike in their lack of nearby health services and public transport, with 0.0% of homes within walking distance of either. This shared isolation is mirrored in their temperature profiles, which are nearly identical. While these two places share some basic traits, they have drifted apart in other ways; the gap in typical family income and the number of people who identify as having no religion have both widened since 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 514
- First area, 2016: 328
- First area, 2021: 419
- Second area, 2011: 1,031
- Second area, 2016: 944
- Second area, 2021: 1,079
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 28 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 29 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 29 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Burke: 0.0% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Kowanyama: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Burke: 1.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Kowanyama: 0.0% males, 0.3% females
- 75–79 in Burke: 1.0% males, 1.4% females; 75–79 in Kowanyama: 0.0% males, 0.6% females
- 70–74 in Burke: 1.7% males, 0.7% females; 70–74 in Kowanyama: 0.4% males, 1.1% females
- 65–69 in Burke: 4.1% males, 3.6% females; 65–69 in Kowanyama: 2.3% males, 1.7% females
- 60–64 in Burke: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 60–64 in Kowanyama: 1.8% males, 1.3% females
- 55–59 in Burke: 6.3% males, 4.3% females; 55–59 in Kowanyama: 1.9% males, 2.9% females
- 50–54 in Burke: 3.4% males, 2.7% females; 50–54 in Kowanyama: 4.6% males, 4.2% females
- 45–49 in Burke: 2.9% males, 2.2% females; 45–49 in Kowanyama: 3.9% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Burke: 3.9% males, 2.4% females; 40–44 in Kowanyama: 2.1% males, 2.1% females
- 35–39 in Burke: 3.6% males, 1.2% females; 35–39 in Kowanyama: 2.1% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Burke: 3.1% males, 2.7% females; 30–34 in Kowanyama: 3.6% males, 4.9% females
- 25–29 in Burke: 5.3% males, 4.3% females; 25–29 in Kowanyama: 4.6% males, 4.1% females
- 20–24 in Burke: 6.8% males, 3.6% females; 20–24 in Kowanyama: 4.5% males, 4.5% females
- 15–19 in Burke: 4.3% males, 3.6% females; 15–19 in Kowanyama: 3.9% males, 4.8% females
- 10–14 in Burke: 1.2% males, 2.4% females; 10–14 in Kowanyama: 5.3% males, 4.3% females
- 5–9 in Burke: 2.7% males, 1.9% females; 5–9 in Kowanyama: 4.0% males, 3.7% females
- 0–4 in Burke: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 0–4 in Kowanyama: 4.1% males, 4.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $824
- First area, 2016: $742
- First area, 2021: $884
- Second area, 2011: $286
- Second area, 2016: $342
- Second area, 2021: $341
- First area, 2011: $1,230
- First area, 2016: $1,047
- First area, 2021: $1,312
- Second area, 2011: $1,077
- Second area, 2016: $944
- Second area, 2021: $1,132
- First area, 2011: $1,231
- First area, 2016: $1,458
- First area, 2021: $2,125
- Second area, 2011: $760
- Second area, 2016: $841
- Second area, 2021: $858
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 4.1
- Second area, 2016: 3.4
- Second area, 2021: 3.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $80
- First area, 2016: $135
- First area, 2021: $150
- Second area, 2011: $45
- Second area, 2016: $65
- Second area, 2021: $115
- First area, 2011: 1.40
- First area, 2016: 1.10
- First area, 2021: 1.00
- Second area, 2011: 1.60
- Second area, 2016: 1.20
- Second area, 2021: 1.30
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Burke with nearby areas
Compare Kowanyama with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Burke vs Kowanyama [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA31950/burke/vs/LGA34420/kowanyama