Compare
Burke vs Doomadgee
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 92 km apart · Burke profile · Doomadgee profile
Burke Doomadgee
Doomadgee and Burke are two Queensland areas with very different social profiles. Doomadgee has a much younger population, with a typical resident aged 25 and 31.4% of people under 15. It also has a far higher First Nations population at 89.3% and a high share of renters at 90.9%. In contrast, Burke is older, with a typical age of 35, and has a typical weekly family income of $2,125, which is far higher than the $882 seen in Doomadgee.
Since 2011, the gaps between these two areas have shifted in various ways, though they still share a similar climate and low use of public transport. The gap in First Nations population and the age difference have both narrowed over time. However, other divides have grown, such as the gap in home ownership and the difference in typical family incomes. While Doomadgee's typical personal income is $354, which is far below the national figure, Burke's typical personal income is $884, sitting slightly above the national average.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 514
- First area, 2016: 328
- First area, 2021: 419
- Second area, 2011: 1,289
- Second area, 2016: 1,405
- Second area, 2021: 1,387
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 22 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 21 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 25 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Burke: 0.0% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Doomadgee: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Burke: 1.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Doomadgee: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Burke: 1.0% males, 1.4% females; 75–79 in Doomadgee: 0.4% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Burke: 1.7% males, 0.7% females; 70–74 in Doomadgee: 0.6% males, 0.2% females
- 65–69 in Burke: 4.1% males, 3.6% females; 65–69 in Doomadgee: 1.4% males, 0.2% females
- 60–64 in Burke: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 60–64 in Doomadgee: 2.2% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Burke: 6.3% males, 4.3% females; 55–59 in Doomadgee: 1.1% males, 2.4% females
- 50–54 in Burke: 3.4% males, 2.7% females; 50–54 in Doomadgee: 2.6% males, 2.2% females
- 45–49 in Burke: 2.9% males, 2.2% females; 45–49 in Doomadgee: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 40–44 in Burke: 3.9% males, 2.4% females; 40–44 in Doomadgee: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Burke: 3.6% males, 1.2% females; 35–39 in Doomadgee: 1.7% males, 3.3% females
- 30–34 in Burke: 3.1% males, 2.7% females; 30–34 in Doomadgee: 3.4% males, 4.2% females
- 25–29 in Burke: 5.3% males, 4.3% females; 25–29 in Doomadgee: 5.1% males, 4.8% females
- 20–24 in Burke: 6.8% males, 3.6% females; 20–24 in Doomadgee: 4.4% males, 5.0% females
- 15–19 in Burke: 4.3% males, 3.6% females; 15–19 in Doomadgee: 5.5% males, 4.1% females
- 10–14 in Burke: 1.2% males, 2.4% females; 10–14 in Doomadgee: 6.0% males, 4.5% females
- 5–9 in Burke: 2.7% males, 1.9% females; 5–9 in Doomadgee: 5.0% males, 5.0% females
- 0–4 in Burke: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 0–4 in Doomadgee: 5.5% males, 5.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $824
- First area, 2016: $742
- First area, 2021: $884
- Second area, 2011: $280
- Second area, 2016: $298
- Second area, 2021: $354
- First area, 2011: $1,230
- First area, 2016: $1,047
- First area, 2021: $1,312
- Second area, 2011: $1,146
- Second area, 2016: $1,082
- Second area, 2021: $1,223
- First area, 2011: $1,231
- First area, 2016: $1,458
- First area, 2021: $2,125
- Second area, 2011: $683
- Second area, 2016: $745
- Second area, 2021: $882
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 5.1
- Second area, 2016: 4.5
- Second area, 2021: 4.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $80
- First area, 2016: $135
- First area, 2021: $150
- Second area, 2011: $105
- Second area, 2016: $120
- Second area, 2021: $120
- First area, 2011: $884
- First area, 2021: $477
- Second area, 2011: $303
- Second area, 2021: $737
- First area, 2011: 1.40
- First area, 2016: 1.10
- First area, 2021: 1.00
- Second area, 2011: 1.90
- Second area, 2016: 1.70
- Second area, 2021: 1.50
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Burke with nearby areas
Compare Doomadgee with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Burke vs Doomadgee [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA31950/burke/vs/LGA32770/doomadgee