Compare
Banana vs Bundaberg
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 212 km apart · Banana profile · Bundaberg profile
Banana Bundaberg
Bundaberg and Banana are two Queensland areas with very different profiles. Bundaberg is much older, with a typical resident aged 47, and has a far higher rate of long-term health conditions at 37.3%. In contrast, Banana has a younger typical resident aged 38 and a much higher share of adults working or looking for work, at 63.3% compared to 50.2% in Bundaberg. Banana also has a higher typical weekly family income of $2,138, while Bundaberg's is $1,427.
These two areas have seen several gaps widen or narrow since 2011. The age difference has grown, with residents now far older in Bundaberg by 9 years. At the same time, the gap in recent overseas arrivals has narrowed, though this figure remains far higher in Banana at 25.5%. Despite these shifts, both areas are very similar in some ways, such as having about 5% First Nations populations and almost identical typical monthly home-loan payments of $1,300.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 14,456
- First area, 2016: 14,319
- First area, 2021: 14,513
- Second area, 2011: 89,810
- Second area, 2016: 92,897
- Second area, 2021: 99,215
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 37 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 47 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Banana: 0.5% males, 1.2% females; 85+ in Bundaberg: 1.2% males, 1.6% females
- 80–84 in Banana: 1.2% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Bundaberg: 1.6% males, 1.8% females
- 75–79 in Banana: 1.5% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in Bundaberg: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 70–74 in Banana: 2.1% males, 1.8% females; 70–74 in Bundaberg: 3.5% males, 3.6% females
- 65–69 in Banana: 2.8% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Bundaberg: 3.6% males, 3.7% females
- 60–64 in Banana: 3.4% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Bundaberg: 3.6% males, 3.9% females
- 55–59 in Banana: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Bundaberg: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Banana: 3.3% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Bundaberg: 3.0% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Banana: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Banana: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Bundaberg: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Banana: 3.7% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Bundaberg: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Banana: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 30–34 in Bundaberg: 2.4% males, 2.6% females
- 25–29 in Banana: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Bundaberg: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 20–24 in Banana: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 20–24 in Bundaberg: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
- 15–19 in Banana: 3.0% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Banana: 3.7% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Bundaberg: 3.3% males, 3.0% females
- 5–9 in Banana: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 5–9 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Banana: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 0–4 in Bundaberg: 2.3% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $630
- First area, 2016: $714
- First area, 2021: $856
- Second area, 2011: $423
- Second area, 2016: $490
- Second area, 2021: $594
- First area, 2011: $1,392
- First area, 2016: $1,575
- First area, 2021: $1,766
- Second area, 2011: $833
- Second area, 2016: $973
- Second area, 2021: $1,157
- First area, 2011: $1,646
- First area, 2016: $1,895
- First area, 2021: $2,138
- Second area, 2011: $980
- Second area, 2016: $1,185
- Second area, 2021: $1,427
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $148
- First area, 2016: $190
- First area, 2021: $240
- Second area, 2011: $230
- Second area, 2016: $260
- Second area, 2021: $285
- First area, 2011: $1,625
- First area, 2016: $1,517
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,350
- Second area, 2016: $1,322
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Banana with nearby areas
Compare Bundaberg with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Banana vs Bundaberg [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA30370/banana/vs/LGA31820/bundaberg