Compare
Bundaberg vs Gympie
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 134 km apart · Bundaberg profile · Gympie profile
Bundaberg Gympie
Bundaberg and Gympie are both regional Queensland centres, but Bundaberg is larger and more walkable. Bundaberg has far higher access to amenities, with 45.6% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries compared to 27.6% in Gympie. It also has far more public transport departures per 1,000 people (151.7 versus 88.1) and a much higher share of recent overseas arrivals at 14.0%, while Gympie's is only 5.7%.
These two areas are almost identical in their typical weekly household incomes, which are $1,157 in Bundaberg and $1,115 in Gympie. While they share similar age profiles, some gaps are widening. Since 2011, the difference in people working from home has grown, with Gympie now well higher at 10.4%. Bundaberg also has a growing share of renters compared to Gympie, and a higher rate of full-time employment (58.1% versus 53.0%).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 89,810
- First area, 2016: 92,897
- First area, 2021: 99,215
- Second area, 2011: 45,749
- Second area, 2016: 49,559
- Second area, 2021: 53,242
- First area, 2011: 43 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 48 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bundaberg: 1.2% males, 1.6% females; 85+ in Gympie: 1.0% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Bundaberg: 1.6% males, 1.8% females; 80–84 in Gympie: 1.4% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Bundaberg: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 75–79 in Gympie: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
- 70–74 in Bundaberg: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 70–74 in Gympie: 3.8% males, 3.6% females
- 65–69 in Bundaberg: 3.6% males, 3.7% females; 65–69 in Gympie: 4.0% males, 3.9% females
- 60–64 in Bundaberg: 3.6% males, 3.9% females; 60–64 in Gympie: 4.0% males, 4.2% females
- 55–59 in Bundaberg: 3.4% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Gympie: 3.7% males, 4.0% females
- 50–54 in Bundaberg: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Gympie: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 45–49 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Gympie: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Bundaberg: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Gympie: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Bundaberg: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 35–39 in Gympie: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Bundaberg: 2.4% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Gympie: 2.2% males, 2.5% females
- 25–29 in Bundaberg: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 25–29 in Gympie: 2.3% males, 2.3% females
- 20–24 in Bundaberg: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in Gympie: 2.1% males, 2.0% females
- 15–19 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Gympie: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Bundaberg: 3.3% males, 3.0% females; 10–14 in Gympie: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Bundaberg: 2.9% males, 2.6% females; 5–9 in Gympie: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Bundaberg: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Gympie: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $423
- First area, 2016: $490
- First area, 2021: $594
- Second area, 2011: $413
- Second area, 2016: $479
- Second area, 2021: $554
- First area, 2011: $833
- First area, 2016: $973
- First area, 2021: $1,157
- Second area, 2011: $806
- Second area, 2016: $939
- Second area, 2021: $1,115
- First area, 2011: $980
- First area, 2016: $1,185
- First area, 2021: $1,427
- Second area, 2011: $947
- Second area, 2016: $1,132
- Second area, 2021: $1,359
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $230
- First area, 2016: $260
- First area, 2021: $285
- Second area, 2011: $220
- Second area, 2016: $250
- Second area, 2021: $290
- First area, 2011: $1,350
- First area, 2016: $1,322
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $1,347
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,327
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Bundaberg with nearby areas
Compare Gympie with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bundaberg vs Gympie [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA31820/bundaberg/vs/LGA33620/gympie