Compare
Latrobe vs Wellington
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 64 km apart · Latrobe profile · Wellington profile
Latrobe Wellington
Latrobe (Vic.) and Wellington are two Victorian areas with different layouts and social profiles. Latrobe (Vic.) is more urbanised, with far more public transport stops (5.69 per 1,000 people) and weekly departures (795.4 per 1,000 people) than Wellington. This is reflected in the streets, where 81.6% of Latrobe (Vic.) homes are within a 10-minute walk of public transport, compared to 49.1% in Wellington. However, Wellington generally has more access to money and resources, and its residents are more likely to own their homes outright (42.3% compared to 37.4% in Latrobe (Vic.)).
The gap in home ownership has widened since 2011, while both areas share very similar typical weekly household incomes of around $1,260 to $1,270. They are also alike in the proportion of children under 15 and the number of people who speak little or no English. While both are larger than most areas of their type, Latrobe (Vic.) has a larger First Nations population and a higher rate of one-parent families (18.6%) than Wellington (13.7%).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 72,396
- First area, 2016: 73,257
- First area, 2021: 77,318
- Second area, 2011: 41,440
- Second area, 2016: 42,983
- Second area, 2021: 45,639
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Latrobe: 1.0% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Wellington: 0.9% males, 1.4% females
- 80–84 in Latrobe: 1.2% males, 1.5% females; 80–84 in Wellington: 1.3% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Latrobe: 1.9% males, 2.0% females; 75–79 in Wellington: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 70–74 in Latrobe: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 70–74 in Wellington: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 65–69 in Latrobe: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 65–69 in Wellington: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 60–64 in Latrobe: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 60–64 in Wellington: 3.7% males, 4.0% females
- 55–59 in Latrobe: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Wellington: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Latrobe: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Wellington: 3.0% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Latrobe: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Wellington: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Latrobe: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Wellington: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Latrobe: 2.9% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Wellington: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Latrobe: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 30–34 in Wellington: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 25–29 in Latrobe: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 25–29 in Wellington: 3.1% males, 2.6% females
- 20–24 in Latrobe: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Wellington: 2.6% males, 2.2% females
- 15–19 in Latrobe: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Wellington: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Latrobe: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 10–14 in Wellington: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Latrobe: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Wellington: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Latrobe: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 0–4 in Wellington: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $468
- First area, 2016: $544
- First area, 2021: $654
- Second area, 2011: $479
- Second area, 2016: $562
- Second area, 2021: $658
- First area, 2011: $942
- First area, 2016: $1,078
- First area, 2021: $1,260
- Second area, 2011: $905
- Second area, 2016: $1,101
- Second area, 2021: $1,272
- First area, 2011: $1,236
- First area, 2016: $1,415
- First area, 2021: $1,679
- Second area, 2011: $1,168
- Second area, 2016: $1,409
- Second area, 2021: $1,661
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $160
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $236
- Second area, 2011: $170
- Second area, 2016: $210
- Second area, 2021: $260
- First area, 2011: $1,200
- First area, 2016: $1,200
- First area, 2021: $1,213
- Second area, 2011: $1,213
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Latrobe with nearby areas
Compare Wellington with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Latrobe vs Wellington [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA23810/latrobe/vs/LGA26810/wellington