Compare
Baw Baw vs Wellington
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 82 km apart · Baw Baw profile · Wellington profile
Baw Baw Wellington
Baw Baw and Wellington are both large regional areas in Victoria, but they differ in their layout and demographics. Baw Baw is more connected and accessible, with far more public transport departures per 1,000 people (389.7 compared to 118.2) and more homes within walking distance of parks and schools. It also has a higher proportion of university graduates (16.8% against 13.8%) and a larger workforce, with 59.3% of adults working or looking for work compared to 53.5% in Wellington.
Both areas are very similar in their levels of diversity and health, with nearly the same share of people born overseas and those living with long-term health conditions. However, other gaps have grown since 2011. The typical resident in Wellington is now noticeably older than in Baw Baw, and the difference in Year 12 completion rates has widened, with Baw Baw well higher at 45.4% compared to 38.8% in Wellington.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 42,864
- First area, 2016: 48,479
- First area, 2021: 57,626
- Second area, 2011: 41,440
- Second area, 2016: 42,983
- Second area, 2021: 45,639
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Baw Baw: 0.9% males, 1.4% females; 85+ in Wellington: 0.9% males, 1.4% females
- 80–84 in Baw Baw: 1.4% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Wellington: 1.3% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Baw Baw: 2.0% males, 2.1% females; 75–79 in Wellington: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 70–74 in Baw Baw: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 70–74 in Wellington: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 65–69 in Baw Baw: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 65–69 in Wellington: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 60–64 in Baw Baw: 3.2% males, 3.6% females; 60–64 in Wellington: 3.7% males, 4.0% females
- 55–59 in Baw Baw: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Wellington: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Baw Baw: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Wellington: 3.0% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Baw Baw: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Wellington: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Baw Baw: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Wellington: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Baw Baw: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Wellington: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Baw Baw: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 30–34 in Wellington: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 25–29 in Baw Baw: 2.8% males, 3.2% females; 25–29 in Wellington: 3.1% males, 2.6% females
- 20–24 in Baw Baw: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 20–24 in Wellington: 2.6% males, 2.2% females
- 15–19 in Baw Baw: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Wellington: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Baw Baw: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 10–14 in Wellington: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Baw Baw: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 5–9 in Wellington: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Baw Baw: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 0–4 in Wellington: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $511
- First area, 2016: $585
- First area, 2021: $726
- Second area, 2011: $479
- Second area, 2016: $562
- Second area, 2021: $658
- First area, 2011: $1,025
- First area, 2016: $1,196
- First area, 2021: $1,495
- Second area, 2011: $905
- Second area, 2016: $1,101
- Second area, 2021: $1,272
- First area, 2011: $1,273
- First area, 2016: $1,462
- First area, 2021: $1,874
- Second area, 2011: $1,168
- Second area, 2016: $1,409
- Second area, 2021: $1,661
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $200
- First area, 2016: $250
- First area, 2021: $320
- Second area, 2011: $170
- Second area, 2016: $210
- Second area, 2021: $260
- First area, 2011: $1,387
- First area, 2016: $1,465
- First area, 2021: $1,600
- Second area, 2011: $1,213
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Baw Baw with nearby areas
Compare Wellington with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Baw Baw vs Wellington [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA20830/baw-baw/vs/LGA26810/wellington