Compare
Glenelg vs Mount Gambier
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 53 km apart · Glenelg profile · Mount Gambier profile
Glenelg Mount Gambier
Mount Gambier and Glenelg are two regional areas located about 53 km apart across the state border. Mount Gambier is more walkable, with a score of 5.9 (somewhat walkable) compared to 3.2 (mostly car-dependent) in Glenelg. This means many more people in Mount Gambier can reach groceries (80.4%) and parks (93.4%) within a 15-minute walk. Glenelg has a much older population, with a typical resident aged 49 compared to 41 in Mount Gambier, and far more homes are owned outright (46.3% vs 30.5%).
Both areas share a similar proportion of residents who own their home with a mortgage, sitting around 30% to 33%, which is close to the national figure. They also have very similar levels of typical weekly household incomes and a nearly identical share of First Nations residents. Over time, the gap in the typical age of residents has widened, and more people in Glenelg now own their homes outright compared to Mount Gambier.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 19,575
- First area, 2016: 19,557
- First area, 2021: 20,152
- Second area, 2011: 25,247
- Second area, 2016: 26,276
- Second area, 2021: 26,878
- First area, 2011: 43 yrs
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Glenelg: 1.1% males, 1.9% females; 85+ in Mount Gambier: 1.1% males, 1.9% females
- 80–84 in Glenelg: 1.6% males, 1.6% females; 80–84 in Mount Gambier: 1.3% males, 1.7% females
- 75–79 in Glenelg: 2.2% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Mount Gambier: 1.7% males, 2.2% females
- 70–74 in Glenelg: 3.7% males, 3.3% females; 70–74 in Mount Gambier: 2.6% males, 2.9% females
- 65–69 in Glenelg: 4.2% males, 4.1% females; 65–69 in Mount Gambier: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 60–64 in Glenelg: 4.2% males, 4.3% females; 60–64 in Mount Gambier: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Glenelg: 4.1% males, 3.9% females; 55–59 in Mount Gambier: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 50–54 in Glenelg: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Mount Gambier: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Glenelg: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Mount Gambier: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Glenelg: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 40–44 in Mount Gambier: 2.5% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Glenelg: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 35–39 in Mount Gambier: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 30–34 in Glenelg: 2.0% males, 2.4% females; 30–34 in Mount Gambier: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 25–29 in Glenelg: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 25–29 in Mount Gambier: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 20–24 in Glenelg: 2.3% males, 1.9% females; 20–24 in Mount Gambier: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Glenelg: 2.9% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Mount Gambier: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 10–14 in Glenelg: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Mount Gambier: 3.4% males, 3.0% females
- 5–9 in Glenelg: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 5–9 in Mount Gambier: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Glenelg: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Mount Gambier: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $463
- First area, 2016: $536
- First area, 2021: $640
- Second area, 2011: $504
- Second area, 2016: $589
- Second area, 2021: $702
- First area, 2011: $899
- First area, 2016: $1,043
- First area, 2021: $1,214
- Second area, 2011: $899
- Second area, 2016: $1,052
- Second area, 2021: $1,232
- First area, 2011: $1,178
- First area, 2016: $1,362
- First area, 2021: $1,599
- Second area, 2011: $1,174
- Second area, 2016: $1,388
- Second area, 2021: $1,684
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $161
- First area, 2016: $182
- First area, 2021: $220
- Second area, 2011: $160
- Second area, 2016: $190
- Second area, 2021: $220
- First area, 2011: $1,148
- First area, 2016: $1,083
- First area, 2021: $1,083
- Second area, 2011: $1,257
- Second area, 2016: $1,172
- Second area, 2021: $1,127
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Glenelg with nearby areas
Compare Mount Gambier with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Glenelg vs Mount Gambier [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA22410/glenelg/vs/LGA44620/mount-gambier