Compare
Gilgandra vs Parkes
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 158 km apart · Gilgandra profile · Parkes profile
Gilgandra Parkes
Parkes and Gilgandra are both regional New South Wales areas, but Parkes has significantly more infrastructure and higher incomes. Residents in Parkes have much better access to essentials, with 68.8% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport compared to just 19.2% in Gilgandra. This is consistent with Parkes having far more public transport stops and departures. The typical weekly family income is also well higher in Parkes at $1,790, while in Gilgandra it is $1,384.
These two areas share a great deal in common, including similar unemployment rates and almost identical shares of people with university degrees. Both areas also have similar numbers of people per home and a similar proportion of residents who have served in the Defence Force. While they share these traits, some gaps are growing; for example, the difference in typical family income and the share of people who finished Year 12 have both widened since 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,368
- First area, 2016: 4,236
- First area, 2021: 4,295
- Second area, 2011: 14,592
- Second area, 2016: 14,608
- Second area, 2021: 14,361
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Gilgandra: 1.1% males, 1.7% females; 85+ in Parkes: 1.1% males, 1.9% females
- 80–84 in Gilgandra: 1.7% males, 2.1% females; 80–84 in Parkes: 1.3% males, 1.7% females
- 75–79 in Gilgandra: 2.1% males, 2.1% females; 75–79 in Parkes: 1.8% males, 2.1% females
- 70–74 in Gilgandra: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 70–74 in Parkes: 2.6% males, 2.4% females
- 65–69 in Gilgandra: 3.6% males, 3.1% females; 65–69 in Parkes: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 60–64 in Gilgandra: 3.7% males, 4.1% females; 60–64 in Parkes: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Gilgandra: 3.9% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Parkes: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 50–54 in Gilgandra: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Parkes: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 45–49 in Gilgandra: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Parkes: 2.6% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Gilgandra: 2.2% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in Parkes: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
- 35–39 in Gilgandra: 2.2% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Parkes: 2.5% males, 3.1% females
- 30–34 in Gilgandra: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Parkes: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 25–29 in Gilgandra: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Parkes: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 20–24 in Gilgandra: 1.9% males, 1.9% females; 20–24 in Parkes: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Gilgandra: 2.4% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Parkes: 3.2% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Gilgandra: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Parkes: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 5–9 in Gilgandra: 3.3% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in Parkes: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 0–4 in Gilgandra: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 0–4 in Parkes: 3.4% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $418
- First area, 2016: $537
- First area, 2021: $632
- Second area, 2011: $456
- Second area, 2016: $554
- Second area, 2021: $700
- First area, 2011: $771
- First area, 2016: $998
- First area, 2021: $1,149
- Second area, 2011: $882
- Second area, 2016: $1,088
- Second area, 2021: $1,336
- First area, 2011: $932
- First area, 2016: $1,199
- First area, 2021: $1,384
- Second area, 2011: $1,131
- Second area, 2016: $1,412
- Second area, 2021: $1,790
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $125
- First area, 2016: $160
- First area, 2021: $200
- Second area, 2011: $150
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2011: $953
- First area, 2016: $1,083
- First area, 2021: $1,083
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,300
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Gilgandra with nearby areas
Compare Parkes with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Gilgandra vs Parkes [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA12950/gilgandra/vs/LGA16200/parkes