Compare
Clarence Valley vs Richmond Valley
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 76 km apart · Clarence Valley profile · Richmond Valley profile
Clarence Valley Richmond Valley
Clarence Valley and Richmond Valley are both regional New South Wales areas with populations that are older than the national figure. Clarence Valley is the larger of the two, with a typical resident aged 49 compared to 46 in Richmond Valley. There are significant differences in their transport and social profiles; Richmond Valley has far more public transport stops per person and a higher share of homes within a 10-minute walk of transport. In contrast, Clarence Valley has far more weekly public transport departures, a higher rate of theft, and a more qualified workforce.
These two areas share very similar economic and social foundations, with nearly identical typical weekly household incomes of around $1,130 and a similar proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. This commonality extends to their housing and health profiles, as both have similar rates of people needing help with daily activities. While the two areas are alike in many ways, some gaps have shifted since 2011, such as the age difference between them narrowing and the gap in people with no religion widening.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 49,665
- First area, 2016: 50,671
- First area, 2021: 54,115
- Second area, 2011: 22,037
- Second area, 2016: 22,807
- Second area, 2021: 23,565
- First area, 2011: 46 yrs
- First area, 2016: 49 yrs
- First area, 2021: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Clarence Valley: 1.3% males, 2.0% females; 85+ in Richmond Valley: 1.3% males, 1.9% females
- 80–84 in Clarence Valley: 1.7% males, 1.8% females; 80–84 in Richmond Valley: 1.6% males, 1.6% females
- 75–79 in Clarence Valley: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 75–79 in Richmond Valley: 2.2% males, 2.4% females
- 70–74 in Clarence Valley: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 70–74 in Richmond Valley: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 65–69 in Clarence Valley: 4.0% males, 4.0% females; 65–69 in Richmond Valley: 3.6% males, 3.6% females
- 60–64 in Clarence Valley: 4.0% males, 4.2% females; 60–64 in Richmond Valley: 3.6% males, 3.6% females
- 55–59 in Clarence Valley: 3.6% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Richmond Valley: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 50–54 in Clarence Valley: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Richmond Valley: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 45–49 in Clarence Valley: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Richmond Valley: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Clarence Valley: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 40–44 in Richmond Valley: 2.4% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Clarence Valley: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 35–39 in Richmond Valley: 2.3% males, 2.4% females
- 30–34 in Clarence Valley: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Richmond Valley: 2.4% males, 2.6% females
- 25–29 in Clarence Valley: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 25–29 in Richmond Valley: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
- 20–24 in Clarence Valley: 2.3% males, 2.1% females; 20–24 in Richmond Valley: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Clarence Valley: 2.7% males, 2.3% females; 15–19 in Richmond Valley: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Clarence Valley: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Richmond Valley: 3.6% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in Clarence Valley: 2.8% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Richmond Valley: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 0–4 in Clarence Valley: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 0–4 in Richmond Valley: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $396
- First area, 2016: $477
- First area, 2021: $578
- Second area, 2011: $407
- Second area, 2016: $491
- Second area, 2021: $609
- First area, 2011: $768
- First area, 2016: $910
- First area, 2021: $1,123
- Second area, 2011: $789
- Second area, 2016: $953
- Second area, 2021: $1,137
- First area, 2011: $924
- First area, 2016: $1,133
- First area, 2021: $1,398
- Second area, 2011: $956
- Second area, 2016: $1,191
- Second area, 2021: $1,431
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $210
- First area, 2016: $255
- First area, 2021: $310
- Second area, 2011: $200
- Second area, 2016: $250
- Second area, 2021: $295
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,378
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,341
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Clarence Valley with nearby areas
Compare Richmond Valley with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Clarence Valley vs Richmond Valley [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA11730/clarence-valley/vs/LGA16610/richmond-valley