Compare
Blue Mountains vs Hawkesbury
Council (LGA) comparison ≈ 56 km apart · Blue Mountains profile · Hawkesbury profile
Blue Mountains Hawkesbury
Blue Mountains and Hawkesbury are both large areas in New South Wales, but they differ in their social and physical makeup. Blue Mountains is far more walkable, with more homes within a 15-minute walk of parks, groceries, and health services. It also has a more highly qualified workforce; 32.7% of adults hold a bachelor degree or higher compared to 15.9% in Hawkesbury. Additionally, people in Blue Mountains are far more likely to have no religion (47.5%) than those in Hawkesbury (34.1%).
Both areas are very similar when it comes to the typical weekly personal income, which is $817 in Blue Mountains and $860 in Hawkesbury. While they share these economic similarities, other gaps are growing. Since 2011, the difference in the number of people working from home has widened, and the gap in university qualifications has also increased. Blue Mountains remains an older area, with a typical resident aged 45, compared to 39 in Hawkesbury.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 75,942
- First area, 2016: 76,904
- First area, 2021: 78,121
- Second area, 2011: 62,353
- Second area, 2016: 64,592
- Second area, 2021: 67,207
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Blue Mountains: 0.8% males, 1.4% females; 85+ in Hawkesbury: 0.7% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Blue Mountains: 1.1% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Hawkesbury: 0.9% males, 1.1% females
- 75–79 in Blue Mountains: 1.9% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Hawkesbury: 1.5% males, 1.7% females
- 70–74 in Blue Mountains: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 70–74 in Hawkesbury: 2.1% males, 2.4% females
- 65–69 in Blue Mountains: 3.4% males, 3.7% females; 65–69 in Hawkesbury: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Blue Mountains: 3.5% males, 4.0% females; 60–64 in Hawkesbury: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 55–59 in Blue Mountains: 3.2% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Hawkesbury: 3.3% males, 3.4% females
- 50–54 in Blue Mountains: 3.4% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Hawkesbury: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 45–49 in Blue Mountains: 3.4% males, 3.7% females; 45–49 in Hawkesbury: 3.2% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Blue Mountains: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Hawkesbury: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Blue Mountains: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Hawkesbury: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Blue Mountains: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 30–34 in Hawkesbury: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 25–29 in Blue Mountains: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 25–29 in Hawkesbury: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 20–24 in Blue Mountains: 2.3% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Hawkesbury: 3.3% males, 3.0% females
- 15–19 in Blue Mountains: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Hawkesbury: 3.4% males, 3.1% females
- 10–14 in Blue Mountains: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Hawkesbury: 3.5% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Blue Mountains: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in Hawkesbury: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Blue Mountains: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 0–4 in Hawkesbury: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $590
- First area, 2016: $688
- First area, 2021: $817
- Second area, 2011: $622
- Second area, 2016: $728
- Second area, 2021: $860
- First area, 2011: $1,270
- First area, 2016: $1,468
- First area, 2021: $1,756
- Second area, 2011: $1,385
- Second area, 2016: $1,668
- Second area, 2021: $1,980
- First area, 2011: $1,624
- First area, 2016: $1,866
- First area, 2021: $2,235
- Second area, 2011: $1,598
- Second area, 2016: $1,916
- Second area, 2021: $2,272
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $280
- First area, 2016: $350
- First area, 2021: $400
- Second area, 2011: $280
- Second area, 2016: $360
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $1,842
- First area, 2016: $1,842
- First area, 2021: $2,035
- Second area, 2011: $2,029
- Second area, 2016: $2,080
- Second area, 2021: $2,200
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Blue Mountains with nearby areas
Compare Hawkesbury with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Blue Mountains vs Hawkesbury [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/lga/LGA10900/blue-mountains/vs/LGA13800/hawkesbury