Compare
Macksville vs Old Burnt - New Burnt Bridge - Greenhill
Indigenous Location comparison ≈ 42 km apart · Macksville profile · Old Burnt - New Burnt Bridge - Greenhill profile
Macksville Old Burnt - New Burnt Bridge - Greenhill
Macksville and Old Burnt - New Burnt Bridge - Greenhill are nearby areas with very different levels of accessibility. Macksville is a hub where 52.9% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries and 52.6% are near health services, making it somewhat walkable. In contrast, Old Burnt - New Burnt Bridge - Greenhill is car-dependent, with only 15.5% of homes within a short walk of groceries and 17.5% near health services. Macksville also has much higher street connectivity with 32 intersections per square kilometre, compared to just 5 in Old Burnt - New Burnt Bridge - Greenhill.
Everyday life in both places is shaped by a similar landscape, as the average terrain slope is nearly identical. They also share a similar typical personal income for First Nations residents, sitting around $440 to $450. However, Old Burnt - New Burnt Bridge - Greenhill has a far larger First Nations population of 675 people, compared to 287 in Macksville. This population is also more likely to speak a First Nations language and has a slightly higher typical age of 26, compared to 24 in Macksville.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Macksville with nearby areas
Compare Old Burnt - New Burnt Bridge - Greenhill with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Macksville vs Old Burnt - New Burnt Bridge - Greenhill [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iloc/ILOC10400504/macksville/vs/ILOC10400904/old-burnt-new-burnt-bridge-greenhill