Compare
East Pilbara vs Fitzroy River
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 348 km apart · East Pilbara profile · Fitzroy River profile
East Pilbara Fitzroy River
East Pilbara and Fitzroy River are both remote Western Australian areas, but they differ sharply in accessibility and First Nations outcomes. East Pilbara is somewhat walkable, with a score of 4.2, while Fitzroy River is car-dependent with a score of 1.2. This is reflected in local access; for example, 90.7% of East Pilbara homes are within a 15-minute walk of a park, compared to 0.0% in Fitzroy River. First Nations households in East Pilbara also have a far higher typical income of $1,529, compared to $681 in Fitzroy River, and a much higher Year 12 completion rate of 35.2% against 14.9% in Fitzroy River.
Everyday life in both places shares a total lack of nearby public transport and very flat terrain. Both areas also have a strong connection to culture, though this is far higher in Fitzroy River, where 88.2% of people speak a First Nations language compared to 58.2% in East Pilbara. While East Pilbara has a far larger First Nations population at 1,746 people, the typical age for First Nations residents is nearly the same in both areas, sitting at 26 in East Pilbara and 25 in Fitzroy River.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare East Pilbara with nearby areas
Compare Fitzroy River with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). East Pilbara vs Fitzroy River [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE506001/east-pilbara/vs/IARE508003/fitzroy-river