Compare
Swan Hill vs Renmark Paringa
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 214 km apart · Swan Hill profile · Renmark Paringa profile
Swan Hill Renmark Paringa
Swan Hill and Renmark Paringa are rural areas located in different states, with Swan Hill being far larger in size. Residents in Swan Hill generally have better access to local amenities on foot, with 64.5% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport and 84.6% near a park, compared to 40.9% and 62.6% in Renmark Paringa. However, Renmark Paringa has better proximity to healthcare, with 47.9% of homes within a 15-minute walk of health services compared to 37.5% in Swan Hill. Swan Hill has a far larger First Nations population, with 967 people compared to 315 in Renmark Paringa.
Both areas are almost identical in their physical landscape, with the same mean terrain slope of 2.8%. They also share similar outcomes for First Nations education, with around 30% of people completing Year 12. While Swan Hill is slightly more walkable overall, the two areas have tracked closely in their street connectivity. The gap in access to parks has widened, with Swan Hill now seeing far higher access than Renmark Paringa.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Swan Hill with nearby areas
Compare Renmark Paringa with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Swan Hill vs Renmark Paringa [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE202014/swan-hill/vs/IARE401017/renmark-paringa