Compare
Central Murray vs Swan Hill
Indigenous Area comparison ≈ 148 km apart · Central Murray profile · Swan Hill profile
Central Murray Swan Hill
Central Murray and Swan Hill are both regional areas, but they differ significantly in how people get around. Swan Hill is more accessible, with a walkability score of 4.8 (somewhat walkable) compared to 3.7 (mostly car-dependent) in Central Murray. This is seen in the local amenities, where 64.5% of Swan Hill homes are within a 10-minute walk of public transport, far higher than the 25.9% found in Central Murray. Swan Hill also has far more homes within a 15-minute walk of a park, at 84.6% compared to 63.2% in Central Murray.
Both areas have tracked similarly since 2011, maintaining very similar levels of school access and terrain slope. They also share a similar rate of First Nations Year 12 completion, which sits at around 30% for both. While Swan Hill has a larger First Nations population, Central Murray has a much lower First Nations unemployment rate of 8.2%, which is well below the national figure.
First Nations
Walkability
Compare Central Murray with nearby areas
Compare Swan Hill with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Central Murray vs Swan Hill [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/iare/IARE105006/central-murray/vs/IARE202014/swan-hill