Compare
Chisholm vs Jagajaga
Federal Electorate comparison ≈ 19 km apart · Chisholm profile · Jagajaga profile
Chisholm Jagajaga
Chisholm and Jagajaga are two nearby Victorian areas with very different cultural makeups. Chisholm is far more diverse, with 49.7% of people born overseas and 50.1% using a language other than English at home. In contrast, 23.3% of Jagajaga residents were born overseas and 19.7% use another language at home. Jagajaga has more separate houses (78.6% compared to 67.3% in Chisholm) and a typical weekly personal income that is well higher at $929, compared to $734 in Chisholm.
Both areas are remarkably similar in their home sizes, with 2.6 people per home, and have almost identical shares of people aged 65 and over. While they share these basic traits, other gaps have grown over time. For example, the difference in overseas births and language use has widened significantly since 2011. Chisholm has also become more distinct in its transport and connectivity, with far more public transport routes and a higher number of intersections per square kilometre than Jagajaga.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 131,585
- First area, 2016: 142,766
- First area, 2021: 183,655
- Second area, 2011: 145,903
- Second area, 2016: 156,965
- Second area, 2021: 158,869
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 39 yrs
- First area, 2021: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Chisholm: 1.4% males, 2.1% females; 85+ in Jagajaga: 0.9% males, 1.5% females
- 80–84 in Chisholm: 1.4% males, 1.8% females; 80–84 in Jagajaga: 1.0% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Chisholm: 1.6% males, 2.0% females; 75–79 in Jagajaga: 1.7% males, 1.9% females
- 70–74 in Chisholm: 1.9% males, 2.3% females; 70–74 in Jagajaga: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
- 65–69 in Chisholm: 2.1% males, 2.5% females; 65–69 in Jagajaga: 2.5% males, 2.9% females
- 60–64 in Chisholm: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 60–64 in Jagajaga: 2.9% males, 3.2% females
- 55–59 in Chisholm: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 55–59 in Jagajaga: 2.9% males, 3.2% females
- 50–54 in Chisholm: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Jagajaga: 3.3% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Chisholm: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Jagajaga: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 40–44 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Jagajaga: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 35–39 in Chisholm: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 35–39 in Jagajaga: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in Chisholm: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 30–34 in Jagajaga: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 25–29 in Chisholm: 4.1% males, 3.3% females; 25–29 in Jagajaga: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 20–24 in Chisholm: 4.5% males, 3.9% females; 20–24 in Jagajaga: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Chisholm: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Jagajaga: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Chisholm: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Jagajaga: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Chisholm: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 5–9 in Jagajaga: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 0–4 in Chisholm: 2.1% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Jagajaga: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $596
- First area, 2016: $662
- First area, 2021: $734
- Second area, 2011: $620
- Second area, 2016: $705
- Second area, 2021: $929
- First area, 2011: $1,327
- First area, 2016: $1,472
- First area, 2021: $1,832
- Second area, 2011: $1,416
- Second area, 2016: $1,724
- Second area, 2021: $2,109
- First area, 2011: $1,552
- First area, 2016: $1,731
- First area, 2021: $2,218
- Second area, 2011: $1,637
- Second area, 2016: $1,922
- Second area, 2021: $2,583
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $290
- First area, 2016: $330
- First area, 2021: $440
- Second area, 2011: $295
- Second area, 2016: $350
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $2,400
- Second area, 2011: $1,733
- Second area, 2016: $1,798
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Chisholm with nearby areas
Compare Jagajaga with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Chisholm vs Jagajaga [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ced/CED207/chisholm/vs/CED225/jagajaga