Compare
Casey vs La Trobe
Federal Electorate comparison ≈ 36 km apart · Casey profile · La Trobe profile
Casey La Trobe
La Trobe and Casey are nearby Victorian areas with distinct profiles. La Trobe is a younger area, where the typical resident is 34 and nearly half the population (49.6%) moved there in the last five years. It is also much more diverse, with 29.4% of people born overseas and 25.1% using a language other than English at home. In contrast, Casey is older, with a typical age of 40, and has a higher share of homes owned outright at 35.1% compared to 22.5% in La Trobe.
Many of the gaps between these two areas have shifted since 2011. While Casey was once more diverse, La Trobe now has a far higher share of overseas-born residents and people using other languages. The two areas are very similar in other ways, such as typical weekly household incomes, which sit around $1,900, and the number of people per home. Both also have a high share of large homes, with more than 84% having at least three bedrooms.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 167,562
- First area, 2016: 165,406
- First area, 2021: 157,444
- Second area, 2011: 128,171
- Second area, 2016: 138,592
- Second area, 2021: 169,469
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 34 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Casey: 0.7% males, 1.0% females; 85+ in La Trobe: 0.5% males, 0.7% females
- 80–84 in Casey: 0.9% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in La Trobe: 0.7% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Casey: 1.7% males, 1.7% females; 75–79 in La Trobe: 1.1% males, 1.2% females
- 70–74 in Casey: 2.4% males, 2.6% females; 70–74 in La Trobe: 1.4% males, 1.8% females
- 65–69 in Casey: 2.6% males, 2.9% females; 65–69 in La Trobe: 1.7% males, 1.9% females
- 60–64 in Casey: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 60–64 in La Trobe: 2.0% males, 2.2% females
- 55–59 in Casey: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in La Trobe: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 50–54 in Casey: 3.4% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in La Trobe: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 45–49 in Casey: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in La Trobe: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Casey: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 40–44 in La Trobe: 3.6% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Casey: 3.2% males, 3.5% females; 35–39 in La Trobe: 4.2% males, 4.5% females
- 30–34 in Casey: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 30–34 in La Trobe: 3.9% males, 4.4% females
- 25–29 in Casey: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 25–29 in La Trobe: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 20–24 in Casey: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in La Trobe: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 15–19 in Casey: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in La Trobe: 3.3% males, 3.0% females
- 10–14 in Casey: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in La Trobe: 3.7% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Casey: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in La Trobe: 4.2% males, 4.0% females
- 0–4 in Casey: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 0–4 in La Trobe: 4.0% males, 3.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $477
- First area, 2016: $486
- First area, 2021: $809
- Second area, 2011: $465
- Second area, 2016: $548
- Second area, 2021: $852
- First area, 2011: $1,214
- First area, 2016: $1,331
- First area, 2021: $1,884
- Second area, 2011: $853
- Second area, 2016: $1,015
- Second area, 2021: $1,976
- First area, 2011: $1,309
- First area, 2016: $1,428
- First area, 2021: $2,204
- Second area, 2011: $1,072
- Second area, 2016: $1,308
- Second area, 2021: $2,170
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.1
- First area, 2016: 3.1
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $280
- First area, 2016: $320
- First area, 2021: $380
- Second area, 2011: $150
- Second area, 2016: $185
- Second area, 2021: $375
- First area, 2011: $1,705
- First area, 2016: $1,600
- First area, 2021: $1,950
- Second area, 2011: $1,083
- Second area, 2016: $1,083
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Casey with nearby areas
Compare La Trobe with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Casey vs La Trobe [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ced/CED206/casey/vs/CED227/la-trobe